Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1618914 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-04-07 17:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-04-07 19:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 3/6] cpufreq: schedutil: ensure max frequency while running RT/DL tasks Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-07 17:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/6] cpufreq: schedutil: ensure max frequency while running RT/DL tasks Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com> - 2017-04-07 19:00 +0200
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-07 17:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/6] cpufreq: schedutil: ensure max frequency while running RT/DL tasks |
| Message-ID | <ttE9s-A7-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 03:45:04PM +0000, Patrick Bellasi wrote: > + struct task_struct *curr = cpu_curr(smp_processor_id()); Isn't that a weird way of writing 'current' ?
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-07 19:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ttFoT-1r2-43@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1618914 |
On 07-Apr 17:30, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 03:45:04PM +0000, Patrick Bellasi wrote: > > + struct task_struct *curr = cpu_curr(smp_processor_id()); > > Isn't that a weird way of writing 'current' ? Right... (cough)... it's a new fangled way. :-/ Will cleanup before reposting the series. -- #include <best/regards.h> Patrick Bellasi
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web