Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1614886 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 5/5] zram: introduce zram data accessor

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  [PATCH 5/5] zram: introduce zram data accessor Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> - 2017-04-03 07:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 5/5] zram: introduce zram data accessor Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 06:50 +0200

#1614886 — [PATCH 5/5] zram: introduce zram data accessor

With element, sometime I got confused handle and element access.
It might be my bad but I think it's time to introduce accessor
to prevent future idiot like me.
This patch is just clean-up patch so it shouldn't change any
behavior.

Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
index fdb73222841d..c3171e5aa582 100644
--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -57,6 +57,16 @@ static inline struct zram *dev_to_zram(struct device *dev)
 	return (struct zram *)dev_to_disk(dev)->private_data;
 }
 
+static unsigned long zram_get_handle(struct zram *zram, u32 index)
+{
+	return zram->table[index].handle;
+}
+
+static void zram_set_handle(struct zram *zram, u32 index, unsigned long handle)
+{
+	zram->table[index].handle = handle;
+}
+
 /* flag operations require table entry bit_spin_lock() being held */
 static int zram_test_flag(struct zram *zram, u32 index,
 			enum zram_pageflags flag)
@@ -82,9 +92,9 @@ static inline void zram_set_element(struct zram *zram, u32 index,
 	zram->table[index].element = element;
 }
 
-static inline void zram_clear_element(struct zram *zram, u32 index)
+static unsigned long zram_get_element(struct zram *zram, u32 index)
 {
-	zram->table[index].element = 0;
+	return zram->table[index].element;
 }
 
 static size_t zram_get_obj_size(struct zram *zram, u32 index)
@@ -428,13 +438,14 @@ static bool zram_special_page_read(struct zram *zram, u32 index,
 				unsigned int offset, unsigned int len)
 {
 	zram_slot_lock(zram, index);
-	if (unlikely(!zram->table[index].handle) ||
-			zram_test_flag(zram, index, ZRAM_SAME)) {
+	if (unlikely(!zram_get_handle(zram, index) ||
+			zram_test_flag(zram, index, ZRAM_SAME))) {
 		void *mem;
 
 		zram_slot_unlock(zram, index);
 		mem = kmap_atomic(page);
-		zram_fill_page(mem + offset, len, zram->table[index].element);
+		zram_fill_page(mem + offset, len,
+					zram_get_element(zram, index));
 		kunmap_atomic(mem);
 		return true;
 	}
@@ -473,7 +484,7 @@ static void zram_meta_free(struct zram *zram, u64 disksize)
 
 	/* Free all pages that are still in this zram device */
 	for (index = 0; index < num_pages; index++) {
-		unsigned long handle = zram->table[index].handle;
+		unsigned long handle = zram_get_handle(zram, index);
 		/*
 		 * No memory is allocated for same element filled pages.
 		 * Simply clear same page flag.
@@ -513,7 +524,7 @@ static bool zram_meta_alloc(struct zram *zram, u64 disksize)
  */
 static void zram_free_page(struct zram *zram, size_t index)
 {
-	unsigned long handle = zram->table[index].handle;
+	unsigned long handle = zram_get_handle(zram, index);
 
 	/*
 	 * No memory is allocated for same element filled pages.
@@ -521,7 +532,7 @@ static void zram_free_page(struct zram *zram, size_t index)
 	 */
 	if (zram_test_flag(zram, index, ZRAM_SAME)) {
 		zram_clear_flag(zram, index, ZRAM_SAME);
-		zram_clear_element(zram, index);
+		zram_set_element(zram, index, 0);
 		atomic64_dec(&zram->stats.same_pages);
 		return;
 	}
@@ -535,7 +546,7 @@ static void zram_free_page(struct zram *zram, size_t index)
 			&zram->stats.compr_data_size);
 	atomic64_dec(&zram->stats.pages_stored);
 
-	zram->table[index].handle = 0;
+	zram_set_handle(zram, index, 0);
 	zram_set_obj_size(zram, index, 0);
 }
 
@@ -550,7 +561,7 @@ static int zram_decompress_page(struct zram *zram, struct page *page, u32 index)
 		return 0;
 
 	zram_slot_lock(zram, index);
-	handle = zram->table[index].handle;
+	handle = zram_get_handle(zram, index);
 	size = zram_get_obj_size(zram, index);
 
 	src = zs_map_object(zram->mem_pool, handle, ZS_MM_RO);
@@ -721,7 +732,7 @@ static int __zram_bvec_write(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec,
 	 */
 	zram_slot_lock(zram, index);
 	zram_free_page(zram, index);
-	zram->table[index].handle = handle;
+	zram_set_handle(zram, index, handle);
 	zram_set_obj_size(zram, index, comp_len);
 	zram_slot_unlock(zram, index);
 
-- 
2.7.4

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1615701

On (04/03/17 14:17), Minchan Kim wrote:
> With element, sometime I got confused handle and element access.
> It might be my bad but I think it's time to introduce accessor
> to prevent future idiot like me.
> This patch is just clean-up patch so it shouldn't change any
> behavior.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>

Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>

	-ss

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web