Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1613515 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-03-31 00:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-03-31 00:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 14 on this page of 34 — 7 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[RFC 0/8] Copy Offload with Peer-to-Peer PCI Memory Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> - 2017-03-31 00:20 +0200
[RFC 1/8] Introduce Peer-to-Peer memory (p2pmem) device Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> - 2017-03-31 00:20 +0200
Re: [RFC 1/8] Introduce Peer-to-Peer memory (p2pmem) device Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> - 2017-03-31 20:50 +0200
Re: [RFC 1/8] Introduce Peer-to-Peer memory (p2pmem) device Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> - 2017-03-31 23:30 +0200
Re: [RFC 1/8] Introduce Peer-to-Peer memory (p2pmem) device Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> - 2017-03-31 23:40 +0200
Re: [RFC 1/8] Introduce Peer-to-Peer memory (p2pmem) device Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> - 2017-04-01 00:50 +0200
Re: [RFC 1/8] Introduce Peer-to-Peer memory (p2pmem) device Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> - 2017-04-01 02:00 +0200
Re: [RFC 1/8] Introduce Peer-to-Peer memory (p2pmem) device Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> - 2017-04-01 04:00 +0200
Re: [RFC 1/8] Introduce Peer-to-Peer memory (p2pmem) device okaya@codeaurora.org - 2017-04-01 04:20 +0200
Re: [RFC 1/8] Introduce Peer-to-Peer memory (p2pmem) device Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> - 2017-04-02 00:20 +0200
Re: [RFC 1/8] Introduce Peer-to-Peer memory (p2pmem) device Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> - 2017-04-02 04:30 +0200
Re: [RFC 1/8] Introduce Peer-to-Peer memory (p2pmem) device Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> - 2017-04-02 19:30 +0200
Re: [RFC 1/8] Introduce Peer-to-Peer memory (p2pmem) device Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> - 2017-04-02 23:10 +0200
Re: [RFC 1/8] Introduce Peer-to-Peer memory (p2pmem) device Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> - 2017-04-03 06:30 +0200
[RFC 4/8] p2pmem: Add debugfs "stats" file Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> - 2017-03-31 00:20 +0200
Re: [RFC 4/8] p2pmem: Add debugfs "stats" file Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> - 2017-04-04 12:50 +0200
Re: [RFC 4/8] p2pmem: Add debugfs "stats" file Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> - 2017-04-04 19:30 +0200
RE: [RFC 4/8] p2pmem: Add debugfs "stats" file "Steve Wise" <swise@opengridcomputing.com> - 2017-04-05 18:20 +0200
[RFC 2/8] cxgb4: setup pcie memory window 4 and create p2pmem region Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> - 2017-03-31 00:20 +0200
Re: [RFC 2/8] cxgb4: setup pcie memory window 4 and create p2pmem region Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> - 2017-04-04 12:50 +0200
Re: [RFC 2/8] cxgb4: setup pcie memory window 4 and create p2pmem region Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> - 2017-04-04 18:00 +0200
RE: [RFC 2/8] cxgb4: setup pcie memory window 4 and create p2pmem region "Steve Wise" <swise@opengridcomputing.com> - 2017-04-05 18:20 +0200
[RFC 5/8] scatterlist: Modify SG copy functions to support io memory. Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> - 2017-03-31 00:20 +0200
Re: [RFC 5/8] scatterlist: Modify SG copy functions to support io memory. Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2017-03-31 09:20 +0200
Re: [RFC 5/8] scatterlist: Modify SG copy functions to support io memory. Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> - 2017-03-31 17:50 +0200
Re: [RFC 5/8] scatterlist: Modify SG copy functions to support io memory. Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> - 2017-04-03 23:30 +0200
Re: [RFC 5/8] scatterlist: Modify SG copy functions to support io memory. Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2017-04-03 23:50 +0200
Re: [RFC 5/8] scatterlist: Modify SG copy functions to support io memory. Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> - 2017-04-04 00:20 +0200
Re: [RFC 5/8] scatterlist: Modify SG copy functions to support io memory. Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2017-04-04 00:50 +0200
Re: [RFC 5/8] scatterlist: Modify SG copy functions to support io memory. Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> - 2017-04-04 01:20 +0200
Re: [RFC 5/8] scatterlist: Modify SG copy functions to support io memory. Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2017-04-04 02:10 +0200
Re: [RFC 5/8] scatterlist: Modify SG copy functions to support io memory. Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> - 2017-04-07 20:00 +0200
[RFC 8/8] p2pmem: Added char device user interface Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> - 2017-03-31 00:20 +0200
[RFC 7/8] p2pmem: Support device removal Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> - 2017-03-31 00:20 +0200
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-04 18:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RFC 2/8] cxgb4: setup pcie memory window 4 and create p2pmem region |
| Message-ID | <tsz2a-6Qd-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1615892 |
On 04/04/17 04:42 AM, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > This is weird, why even call this if !use_p2pmem? I personally find it cleaner than: if (use_p2pmem) setup_memwin_p2pmem(...) I'm not sure why that's so weird. Logan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Steve Wise" <swise@opengridcomputing.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-05 18:20 +0200 |
| Subject | RE: [RFC 2/8] cxgb4: setup pcie memory window 4 and create p2pmem region |
| Message-ID | <tsVP3-4TK-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1615892 |
>
>
> > +static void setup_memwin_p2pmem(struct adapter *adap)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int mem_base = t4_read_reg(adap,
> CIM_EXTMEM2_BASE_ADDR_A);
> > + unsigned int mem_size = t4_read_reg(adap,
> CIM_EXTMEM2_ADDR_SIZE_A);
> > +
> > + if (!use_p2pmem)
> > + return;
>
> This is weird, why even call this if !use_p2pmem?
>
The use_p2pmem was added after the original change. I'll update as you
suggest.
> > +static int init_p2pmem(struct adapter *adapter)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int mem_size = t4_read_reg(adapter,
> CIM_EXTMEM2_ADDR_SIZE_A);
> > + struct p2pmem_dev *p;
> > + int rc;
> > + struct resource res;
> > +
> > + if (!mem_size || !use_p2pmem)
> > + return 0;
>
> Again, weird...
Yup.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-31 00:20 +0200 |
| Subject | [RFC 5/8] scatterlist: Modify SG copy functions to support io memory. |
| Message-ID | <tqQAb-4sB-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1613515 |
Now that we are using p2pmem SG buffers we occasionally have to copy
to and from this memory. For this, we add an iomem flag to
sg_copy_buffer for copying with iomemcpy. We also add the sg_iocopy_
variants to use this more easily.
Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Bates <sbates@raithlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com>
---
drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c | 7 ++---
include/linux/scatterlist.h | 7 ++++-
lib/scatterlist.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
3 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
index 17249c3..70c0d9f 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
@@ -1309,7 +1309,7 @@ static int resp_inquiry(struct scsi_cmnd *scp, struct sdebug_dev_info *devip)
int lu_id_num, port_group_id, target_dev_id, len;
char lu_id_str[6];
int host_no = devip->sdbg_host->shost->host_no;
-
+
port_group_id = (((host_no + 1) & 0x7f) << 8) +
(devip->channel & 0x7f);
if (sdebug_vpd_use_hostno == 0)
@@ -2381,14 +2381,15 @@ static int do_device_access(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd, u64 lba, u32 num,
ret = sg_copy_buffer(sdb->table.sgl, sdb->table.nents,
fake_storep + (block * sdebug_sector_size),
- (num - rest) * sdebug_sector_size, 0, do_write);
+ (num - rest) * sdebug_sector_size, 0, do_write, false);
if (ret != (num - rest) * sdebug_sector_size)
return ret;
if (rest) {
ret += sg_copy_buffer(sdb->table.sgl, sdb->table.nents,
fake_storep, rest * sdebug_sector_size,
- (num - rest) * sdebug_sector_size, do_write);
+ (num - rest) * sdebug_sector_size, do_write,
+ false);
}
return ret;
diff --git a/include/linux/scatterlist.h b/include/linux/scatterlist.h
index cb3c8fe..030b92b 100644
--- a/include/linux/scatterlist.h
+++ b/include/linux/scatterlist.h
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ int sg_alloc_table_from_pages(struct sg_table *sgt,
gfp_t gfp_mask);
size_t sg_copy_buffer(struct scatterlist *sgl, unsigned int nents, void *buf,
- size_t buflen, off_t skip, bool to_buffer);
+ size_t buflen, off_t skip, bool to_buffer, bool iomem);
size_t sg_copy_from_buffer(struct scatterlist *sgl, unsigned int nents,
const void *buf, size_t buflen);
@@ -279,6 +279,11 @@ size_t sg_pcopy_from_buffer(struct scatterlist *sgl, unsigned int nents,
size_t sg_pcopy_to_buffer(struct scatterlist *sgl, unsigned int nents,
void *buf, size_t buflen, off_t skip);
+size_t sg_iocopy_from_buffer(struct scatterlist *sgl, unsigned int nents,
+ const void *buf, size_t buflen);
+size_t sg_iocopy_to_buffer(struct scatterlist *sgl, unsigned int nents,
+ void *buf, size_t buflen);
+
/*
* Maximum number of entries that will be allocated in one piece, if
* a list larger than this is required then chaining will be utilized.
diff --git a/lib/scatterlist.c b/lib/scatterlist.c
index c6cf822..22abd94 100644
--- a/lib/scatterlist.c
+++ b/lib/scatterlist.c
@@ -647,7 +647,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(sg_miter_stop);
*
**/
size_t sg_copy_buffer(struct scatterlist *sgl, unsigned int nents, void *buf,
- size_t buflen, off_t skip, bool to_buffer)
+ size_t buflen, off_t skip, bool to_buffer, bool iomem)
{
unsigned int offset = 0;
struct sg_mapping_iter miter;
@@ -668,10 +668,17 @@ size_t sg_copy_buffer(struct scatterlist *sgl, unsigned int nents, void *buf,
len = min(miter.length, buflen - offset);
- if (to_buffer)
- memcpy(buf + offset, miter.addr, len);
- else
- memcpy(miter.addr, buf + offset, len);
+ if (iomem) {
+ if (to_buffer)
+ memcpy_fromio(buf + offset, miter.addr, len);
+ else
+ memcpy_toio(miter.addr, buf + offset, len);
+ } else {
+ if (to_buffer)
+ memcpy(buf + offset, miter.addr, len);
+ else
+ memcpy(miter.addr, buf + offset, len);
+ }
offset += len;
}
@@ -695,7 +702,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(sg_copy_buffer);
size_t sg_copy_from_buffer(struct scatterlist *sgl, unsigned int nents,
const void *buf, size_t buflen)
{
- return sg_copy_buffer(sgl, nents, (void *)buf, buflen, 0, false);
+ return sg_copy_buffer(sgl, nents, (void *)buf, buflen, 0, false,
+ false);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(sg_copy_from_buffer);
@@ -712,7 +720,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(sg_copy_from_buffer);
size_t sg_copy_to_buffer(struct scatterlist *sgl, unsigned int nents,
void *buf, size_t buflen)
{
- return sg_copy_buffer(sgl, nents, buf, buflen, 0, true);
+ return sg_copy_buffer(sgl, nents, buf, buflen, 0, true, false);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(sg_copy_to_buffer);
@@ -730,7 +738,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(sg_copy_to_buffer);
size_t sg_pcopy_from_buffer(struct scatterlist *sgl, unsigned int nents,
const void *buf, size_t buflen, off_t skip)
{
- return sg_copy_buffer(sgl, nents, (void *)buf, buflen, skip, false);
+ return sg_copy_buffer(sgl, nents, (void *)buf, buflen, skip, false,
+ false);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(sg_pcopy_from_buffer);
@@ -748,6 +757,43 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(sg_pcopy_from_buffer);
size_t sg_pcopy_to_buffer(struct scatterlist *sgl, unsigned int nents,
void *buf, size_t buflen, off_t skip)
{
- return sg_copy_buffer(sgl, nents, buf, buflen, skip, true);
+ return sg_copy_buffer(sgl, nents, buf, buflen, skip, true, false);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(sg_pcopy_to_buffer);
+
+/**
+ * sg_iocopy_from_buffer - Copy from a linear buffer to an SG list containing
+ * IO memory.
+ * @sgl: The SG list
+ * @nents: Number of SG entries
+ * @buf: Where to copy from
+ * @buflen: The number of bytes to copy
+ *
+ * Returns the number of copied bytes.
+ *
+ **/
+size_t sg_iocopy_from_buffer(struct scatterlist *sgl, unsigned int nents,
+ const void *buf, size_t buflen)
+{
+ return sg_copy_buffer(sgl, nents, (void *)buf, buflen, 0, false,
+ true);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(sg_iocopy_from_buffer);
+
+/**
+ * sg_iocopy_to_buffer - Copy from an SG list containing IO memory
+ * to a linear buffer
+ * @sgl: The SG list
+ * @nents: Number of SG entries
+ * @buf: Where to copy to
+ * @buflen: The number of bytes to copy
+ *
+ * Returns the number of copied bytes.
+ *
+ **/
+size_t sg_iocopy_to_buffer(struct scatterlist *sgl, unsigned int nents,
+ void *buf, size_t buflen)
+{
+ return sg_copy_buffer(sgl, nents, buf, buflen, 0, true, true);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(sg_iocopy_to_buffer);
--
2.1.4
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-31 09:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RFC 5/8] scatterlist: Modify SG copy functions to support io memory. |
| Message-ID | <tqZ0J-1qH-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1613520 |
You're calling memcpy_{to,from}_iomem on non-__iomem pointers. This
is a fundamental no-go as we keep I/O memory separate from kernel
pointers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-31 17:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RFC 5/8] scatterlist: Modify SG copy functions to support io memory. |
| Message-ID | <tr6Yh-6ua-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1613677 |
On 31/03/17 01:09 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> You're calling memcpy_{to,from}_iomem on non-__iomem pointers. This
> is a fundamental no-go as we keep I/O memory separate from kernel
> pointers.
Yes, that's true, however I don't know how we could get around that when
the iomem is referenced by struct pages inside a scatter gather list. Do
we need to now have special __iomem sgls? And even still, I'm not sure
how that could work when the nvme target code is using the same sgls to
sometimes point to iomem and sometimes point to regular memory.
I'm certainly open to suggestions, though.
Logan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-03 23:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RFC 5/8] scatterlist: Modify SG copy functions to support io memory. |
| Message-ID | <tshHY-3Tw-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1614125 |
Hi Christoph,
What are your thoughts on an approach like the following untested
draft patch.
The patch (if fleshed out) makes it so iomem can be used in an sgl
and WARN_ONs will occur in places where drivers attempt to access
iomem directly through the sgl.
I'd also probably create a p2pmem_alloc_sgl helper function so driver
writers wouldn't have to mess with sg_set_iomem_page.
With all that in place, it should be relatively safe for drivers to
implement p2pmem even though we'd still technically be violating the
__iomem boundary in some places.
Logan
commit b435a154a4ec4f82766f6ab838092c3c5a9388ac
Author: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Date: Wed Feb 8 12:44:52 2017 -0700
scatterlist: Add support for iomem pages
This patch steals another bit from the page_link field to indicate the
sg points to iomem. In sg_copy_buffer we use this flag to select
between memcpy and iomemcpy. Other sg_miter users will get an WARN_ON
unless they indicate they support iomemory by setting the
SG_MITER_IOMEM flag.
Also added are sg_kmap functions which would replace a common pattern
of kmap(sg_page(sg)). These new functions then also warn if the caller
tries to map io memory. Another option may be to automatically copy
the iomem to a new page and return that transparently to the driver.
Another coccinelle patch would then be done to convert kmap(sg_page(sg))
instances to the appropriate sg_kmap calls.
Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
index 0007b79..bd690a2c 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
@@ -37,6 +37,9 @@
#include <uapi/linux/dma-buf.h>
+/* Avoid the highmem.h macro from aliasing our ops->kunmap_atomic */
+#undef kunmap_atomic
+
static inline int is_dma_buf_file(struct file *);
struct dma_buf_list {
diff --git a/include/linux/scatterlist.h b/include/linux/scatterlist.h
index cb3c8fe..7608da0 100644
--- a/include/linux/scatterlist.h
+++ b/include/linux/scatterlist.h
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <linux/bug.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
+#include <linux/highmem.h>
#include <asm/io.h>
struct scatterlist {
@@ -53,6 +54,9 @@ struct sg_table {
*
* If bit 1 is set, then this sg entry is the last element in a list.
*
+ * We also use bit 2 to indicate whether the page_link points to an
+ * iomem page or not.
+ *
* See sg_next().
*
*/
@@ -64,10 +68,17 @@ struct sg_table {
* a valid sg entry, or whether it points to the start of a new
scatterlist.
* Those low bits are there for everyone! (thanks mason :-)
*/
-#define sg_is_chain(sg) ((sg)->page_link & 0x01)
-#define sg_is_last(sg) ((sg)->page_link & 0x02)
+#define PAGE_LINK_MASK 0x7
+#define PAGE_LINK_CHAIN 0x1
+#define PAGE_LINK_LAST 0x2
+#define PAGE_LINK_IOMEM 0x4
+
+#define sg_is_chain(sg) ((sg)->page_link & PAGE_LINK_CHAIN)
+#define sg_is_last(sg) ((sg)->page_link & PAGE_LINK_LAST)
#define sg_chain_ptr(sg) \
- ((struct scatterlist *) ((sg)->page_link & ~0x03))
+ ((struct scatterlist *) ((sg)->page_link & ~(PAGE_LINK_CHAIN | \
+ PAGE_LINK_LAST)))
+#define sg_is_iomem(sg) ((sg)->page_link & PAGE_LINK_IOMEM)
/**
* sg_assign_page - Assign a given page to an SG entry
@@ -81,13 +92,13 @@ struct sg_table {
**/
static inline void sg_assign_page(struct scatterlist *sg, struct page
*page)
{
- unsigned long page_link = sg->page_link & 0x3;
+ unsigned long page_link = sg->page_link & PAGE_LINK_MASK;
/*
* In order for the low bit stealing approach to work, pages
- * must be aligned at a 32-bit boundary as a minimum.
+ * must be aligned at a 64-bit boundary as a minimum.
*/
- BUG_ON((unsigned long) page & 0x03);
+ BUG_ON((unsigned long) page & PAGE_LINK_MASK);
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SG
BUG_ON(sg->sg_magic != SG_MAGIC);
BUG_ON(sg_is_chain(sg));
@@ -117,13 +128,56 @@ static inline void sg_set_page(struct scatterlist
*sg, struct page *page,
sg->length = len;
}
+/**
+ * sg_set_page - Set sg entry to point at given iomem page
+ * @sg: SG entry
+ * @page: The page
+ * @len: Length of data
+ * @offset: Offset into page
+ *
+ * Description:
+ * Same as sg_set_page but used when the page is a ZONE_DEVICE page that
+ * points to IO memory.
+ *
+ **/
+static inline void sg_set_iomem_page(struct scatterlist *sg, struct
page *page,
+ unsigned int len, unsigned int offset)
+{
+ sg_set_page(sg, page, len, offset);
+ sg->page_link |= PAGE_LINK_IOMEM;
+}
+
static inline struct page *sg_page(struct scatterlist *sg)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SG
BUG_ON(sg->sg_magic != SG_MAGIC);
BUG_ON(sg_is_chain(sg));
#endif
- return (struct page *)((sg)->page_link & ~0x3);
+ return (struct page *)((sg)->page_link & ~PAGE_LINK_MASK);
+}
+
+static inline void *sg_kmap(struct scatterlist *sg)
+{
+ WARN_ON(sg_is_iomem(sg));
+
+ return kmap(sg_page(sg));
+}
+
+static inline void sg_kunmap(struct scatterlist *sg, void *addr)
+{
+ kunmap(addr);
+}
+
+static inline void *sg_kmap_atomic(struct scatterlist *sg)
+{
+ WARN_ON(sg_is_iomem(sg));
+
+ return kmap(sg_page(sg));
+}
+
+static inline void sg_kunmap_atomic(struct scatterlist *sg, void *addr)
+{
+ kunmap_atomic(addr);
}
/**
@@ -171,7 +225,8 @@ static inline void sg_chain(struct scatterlist *prv,
unsigned int prv_nents,
* Set lowest bit to indicate a link pointer, and make sure to clear
* the termination bit if it happens to be set.
*/
- prv[prv_nents - 1].page_link = ((unsigned long) sgl | 0x01) & ~0x02;
+ prv[prv_nents - 1].page_link =
+ ((unsigned long) sgl & ~PAGE_LINK_MASK) | PAGE_LINK_CHAIN;
}
/**
@@ -191,8 +246,8 @@ static inline void sg_mark_end(struct scatterlist *sg)
/*
* Set termination bit, clear potential chain bit
*/
- sg->page_link |= 0x02;
- sg->page_link &= ~0x01;
+ sg->page_link &= ~PAGE_LINK_MASK;
+ sg->page_link |= PAGE_LINK_LAST;
}
/**
@@ -208,7 +263,7 @@ static inline void sg_unmark_end(struct scatterlist *sg)
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SG
BUG_ON(sg->sg_magic != SG_MAGIC);
#endif
- sg->page_link &= ~0x02;
+ sg->page_link &= ~PAGE_LINK_LAST;
}
/**
@@ -383,6 +438,7 @@ static inline dma_addr_t
sg_page_iter_dma_address(struct sg_page_iter *piter)
#define SG_MITER_ATOMIC (1 << 0) /* use kmap_atomic */
#define SG_MITER_TO_SG (1 << 1) /* flush back to phys on unmap */
#define SG_MITER_FROM_SG (1 << 2) /* nop */
+#define SG_MITER_IOMEM (1 << 3) /* support iomem in miter ops */
struct sg_mapping_iter {
/* the following three fields can be accessed directly */
diff --git a/lib/scatterlist.c b/lib/scatterlist.c
index c6cf822..6d8f39b 100644
--- a/lib/scatterlist.c
+++ b/lib/scatterlist.c
@@ -580,6 +580,9 @@ bool sg_miter_next(struct sg_mapping_iter *miter)
if (!sg_miter_get_next_page(miter))
return false;
+ if (!(miter->__flags & SG_MITER_IOMEM))
+ WARN_ON(sg_is_iomem(miter->piter.sg));
+
miter->page = sg_page_iter_page(&miter->piter);
miter->consumed = miter->length = miter->__remaining;
@@ -651,7 +654,7 @@ size_t sg_copy_buffer(struct scatterlist *sgl,
unsigned int nents, void *buf,
{
unsigned int offset = 0;
struct sg_mapping_iter miter;
- unsigned int sg_flags = SG_MITER_ATOMIC;
+ unsigned int sg_flags = SG_MITER_ATOMIC | SG_MITER_IOMEM;
if (to_buffer)
sg_flags |= SG_MITER_FROM_SG;
@@ -668,10 +671,17 @@ size_t sg_copy_buffer(struct scatterlist *sgl,
unsigned int nents, void *buf,
len = min(miter.length, buflen - offset);
- if (to_buffer)
- memcpy(buf + offset, miter.addr, len);
- else
- memcpy(miter.addr, buf + offset, len);
+ if (sg_is_iomem(miter.piter.sg)) {
+ if (to_buffer)
+ memcpy_fromio(buf + offset, miter.addr, len);
+ else
+ memcpy_toio(miter.addr, buf + offset, len);
+ } else {
+ if (to_buffer)
+ memcpy(buf + offset, miter.addr, len);
+ else
+ memcpy(miter.addr, buf + offset, len);
+ }
offset += len;
}
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-03 23:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RFC 5/8] scatterlist: Modify SG copy functions to support io memory. |
| Message-ID | <tsi1j-40v-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1615566 |
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> wrote: > Hi Christoph, > > What are your thoughts on an approach like the following untested > draft patch. > > The patch (if fleshed out) makes it so iomem can be used in an sgl > and WARN_ONs will occur in places where drivers attempt to access > iomem directly through the sgl. > > I'd also probably create a p2pmem_alloc_sgl helper function so driver > writers wouldn't have to mess with sg_set_iomem_page. > > With all that in place, it should be relatively safe for drivers to > implement p2pmem even though we'd still technically be violating the > __iomem boundary in some places. Just reacting to this mail, I still haven't had a chance to take a look at the rest of the series. The pfn_t type was invented to carry extra type and page lookup information about the memory behind a given pfn. At first glance that seems a more natural place to carry an indication that this is an "I/O" pfn.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-04 00:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RFC 5/8] scatterlist: Modify SG copy functions to support io memory. |
| Message-ID | <tsiul-4rW-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1615575 |
On 03/04/17 03:44 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> wrote: >> Hi Christoph, >> >> What are your thoughts on an approach like the following untested >> draft patch. >> >> The patch (if fleshed out) makes it so iomem can be used in an sgl >> and WARN_ONs will occur in places where drivers attempt to access >> iomem directly through the sgl. >> >> I'd also probably create a p2pmem_alloc_sgl helper function so driver >> writers wouldn't have to mess with sg_set_iomem_page. >> >> With all that in place, it should be relatively safe for drivers to >> implement p2pmem even though we'd still technically be violating the >> __iomem boundary in some places. > > Just reacting to this mail, I still haven't had a chance to take a > look at the rest of the series. > > The pfn_t type was invented to carry extra type and page lookup > information about the memory behind a given pfn. At first glance that > seems a more natural place to carry an indication that this is an > "I/O" pfn. I agree... But what are the plans for pfn_t? Is anyone working on using it in the scatterlist code? Currently it's not there yet and given the assertion that we will continue to be using struct page for DMA is that a direction we'd want to go? Logan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-04 00:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RFC 5/8] scatterlist: Modify SG copy functions to support io memory. |
| Message-ID | <tsiXo-4DT-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1615593 |
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 3:10 PM, Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> wrote: > > > On 03/04/17 03:44 PM, Dan Williams wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> wrote: >>> Hi Christoph, >>> >>> What are your thoughts on an approach like the following untested >>> draft patch. >>> >>> The patch (if fleshed out) makes it so iomem can be used in an sgl >>> and WARN_ONs will occur in places where drivers attempt to access >>> iomem directly through the sgl. >>> >>> I'd also probably create a p2pmem_alloc_sgl helper function so driver >>> writers wouldn't have to mess with sg_set_iomem_page. >>> >>> With all that in place, it should be relatively safe for drivers to >>> implement p2pmem even though we'd still technically be violating the >>> __iomem boundary in some places. >> >> Just reacting to this mail, I still haven't had a chance to take a >> look at the rest of the series. >> >> The pfn_t type was invented to carry extra type and page lookup >> information about the memory behind a given pfn. At first glance that >> seems a more natural place to carry an indication that this is an >> "I/O" pfn. > > I agree... But what are the plans for pfn_t? Is anyone working on using > it in the scatterlist code? Currently it's not there yet and given the > assertion that we will continue to be using struct page for DMA is that > a direction we'd want to go? > I wouldn't necessarily conflate supporting pfn_t in the scatterlist with the stalled stuct-page-less DMA effor. A pfn_t_to_page() conversion will still work and be required. However you're right, the minute we use pfn_t for this we're into the realm of special case drivers that understand scatterlists with special "I/O-pfn_t" entries. However, maybe that's what we want? I think peer-to-peer DMA is not a general purpose feature unless/until we get it standardized in PCI. So maybe drivers with special case scatterlist support is exactly what we want for now. Thoughts?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-04 01:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RFC 5/8] scatterlist: Modify SG copy functions to support io memory. |
| Message-ID | <tsjqp-536-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1615602 |
On 03/04/17 04:47 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > I wouldn't necessarily conflate supporting pfn_t in the scatterlist > with the stalled stuct-page-less DMA effor. A pfn_t_to_page() > conversion will still work and be required. However you're right, the > minute we use pfn_t for this we're into the realm of special case > drivers that understand scatterlists with special "I/O-pfn_t" entries. Well yes, it would certainly be possible to convert the scatterlist code from page_link to pfn_t. (The only slightly tricky thing is that scatterlist uses extra chaining bits and pfn_t uses extra flag bits so they'd have to be harmonized somehow). But if we aren't moving toward struct-page-less DMA, I fail to see the point of the conversion. I'll definitely need IO scatterlists of some form or another and I like pfn_t but right now it just seems like extra work with unclear benefit. (Though, if someone told me that I can't use a third bit in the page_link field then maybe that would be a good reason to move to pfn_t.) > However, maybe that's what we want? I think peer-to-peer DMA is not a > general purpose feature unless/until we get it standardized in PCI. So > maybe drivers with special case scatterlist support is exactly what we > want for now. Well, I think this should be completely independent from PCI code. I see no reason why we can't have infrastructure for DMA on iomem from any bus. Largely all the work I've done in this area is completely agnostic to the bus in use. (Except for any kind of white/black list when it is used.) The "special case scatterlist" is essentially what I'm proposing in the patch I sent upthread, it just stores the flag in the page_link instead of in a pfn_t. Logan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-04 02:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RFC 5/8] scatterlist: Modify SG copy functions to support io memory. |
| Message-ID | <tskcN-5Aq-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1615612 |
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> wrote: > > > On 03/04/17 04:47 PM, Dan Williams wrote: >> I wouldn't necessarily conflate supporting pfn_t in the scatterlist >> with the stalled stuct-page-less DMA effor. A pfn_t_to_page() >> conversion will still work and be required. However you're right, the >> minute we use pfn_t for this we're into the realm of special case >> drivers that understand scatterlists with special "I/O-pfn_t" entries. > > Well yes, it would certainly be possible to convert the scatterlist code > from page_link to pfn_t. (The only slightly tricky thing is that > scatterlist uses extra chaining bits and pfn_t uses extra flag bits so > they'd have to be harmonized somehow). But if we aren't moving toward > struct-page-less DMA, I fail to see the point of the conversion. > > I'll definitely need IO scatterlists of some form or another and I like > pfn_t but right now it just seems like extra work with unclear benefit. > (Though, if someone told me that I can't use a third bit in the > page_link field then maybe that would be a good reason to move to pfn_t.) > >> However, maybe that's what we want? I think peer-to-peer DMA is not a >> general purpose feature unless/until we get it standardized in PCI. So >> maybe drivers with special case scatterlist support is exactly what we >> want for now. > > Well, I think this should be completely independent from PCI code. I see > no reason why we can't have infrastructure for DMA on iomem from any > bus. Largely all the work I've done in this area is completely agnostic > to the bus in use. (Except for any kind of white/black list when it is > used.) The completely agnostic part is where I get worried, but I shouldn't say anymore until I actually read the patch.The worry is cases where this agnostic enabling allows unsuspecting code paths to do the wrong thing. Like bypass iomem safety. > The "special case scatterlist" is essentially what I'm proposing in the > patch I sent upthread, it just stores the flag in the page_link instead > of in a pfn_t. Makes sense. The suggestion of pfn_t was to try to get more type safety throughout the stack. So that, again, unsuspecting code paths that get an I/O pfn aren't able to do things like page_address() or kmap() without failing. I'll stop commenting now and set aside some time to go read the patches.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-07 20:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RFC 5/8] scatterlist: Modify SG copy functions to support io memory. |
| Message-ID | <ttGkW-28n-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1615627 |
Hi Dan, On 03/04/17 06:07 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > The completely agnostic part is where I get worried, but I shouldn't > say anymore until I actually read the patch.The worry is cases where > this agnostic enabling allows unsuspecting code paths to do the wrong > thing. Like bypass iomem safety. Yup, you're right the iomem safety issue is a really difficult problem. I think replacing struct page with pfn_t in a bunch of places is probably going to be a requirement for my work. However, this is going to be a very large undertaking. I've done an audit of sg_page users and there will indeed be some difficult cases. However, I'm going to start doing some cleanup and semantic changes to hopefully move in that direction. The first step I've chosen to look at is to create an sg_kmap interface which replaces about 77 (out of ~340) sg_page users. I'm hoping the new interface can have the semantic that sg_kmap can fail (which would happen in the case that no suitable page exists). Eventually, I'd want to get to a place where sg_page either doesn't exists or can fail and is always checked. At that point swapping out pfn_t in the sgl would be manageable. Thoughts? Logan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-31 00:20 +0200 |
| Subject | [RFC 8/8] p2pmem: Added char device user interface |
| Message-ID | <tqQAa-4sB-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1613515 |
This creates a userspace interface to use p2pmemory. A user can use
mmap on the p2pmem char device to get buffers from the corresponding
device. This allows a user to use p2p memory with existing
interfaces like RDMA and O_DIRECT.
This patch is a bit more controversial because people don't want to
expose these interfaces to userspace without more consideration.
However, this patch is _very_ useful for expirementing with p2p memory.
For example, with this patch, you can test with commands like:
ib_write_bw -R --mmap=/dev/p2pmem0 -D 30
or use an fio script like:
[rdma-server]
rw=read
mem=mmapshared:/dev/p2pmem0
ioengine=rdma
port=14242
bs=64k
size=10G
iodepth=2
which would test the bandwidth of RDMA to/from the specified p2p memory.
Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Bates <sbates@raithlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com>
---
drivers/memory/p2pmem.c | 184 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
include/linux/p2pmem.h | 4 ++
2 files changed, 186 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/memory/p2pmem.c b/drivers/memory/p2pmem.c
index 499d42c..129c49c 100644
--- a/drivers/memory/p2pmem.c
+++ b/drivers/memory/p2pmem.c
@@ -19,14 +19,20 @@
#include <linux/genalloc.h>
#include <linux/memremap.h>
#include <linux/debugfs.h>
+#include <linux/pfn_t.h>
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Peer 2 Peer Memory Device");
MODULE_VERSION("0.1");
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
MODULE_AUTHOR("Microsemi Corporation");
+static int max_devices = 16;
+module_param(max_devices, int, 0444);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(max_devices, "Maximum number of char devices");
+
static struct class *p2pmem_class;
static DEFINE_IDA(p2pmem_ida);
+static dev_t p2pmem_devt;
static struct dentry *p2pmem_debugfs_root;
@@ -67,6 +73,144 @@ static struct p2pmem_dev *to_p2pmem(struct device *dev)
return container_of(dev, struct p2pmem_dev, dev);
}
+struct p2pmem_vma {
+ struct p2pmem_dev *p2pmem_dev;
+ atomic_t mmap_count;
+ size_t nr_pages;
+
+ /* Protects the used_pages array */
+ struct mutex mutex;
+ struct page *used_pages[];
+};
+
+static void p2pmem_vma_open(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+ struct p2pmem_vma *pv = vma->vm_private_data;
+
+ atomic_inc(&pv->mmap_count);
+}
+
+static void p2pmem_vma_free_pages(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+ int i;
+ struct p2pmem_vma *pv = vma->vm_private_data;
+
+ mutex_lock(&pv->mutex);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < pv->nr_pages; i++) {
+ if (pv->used_pages[i]) {
+ p2pmem_free_page(pv->p2pmem_dev, pv->used_pages[i]);
+ pv->used_pages[i] = NULL;
+ }
+ }
+
+ mutex_unlock(&pv->mutex);
+}
+
+static void p2pmem_vma_close(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+ struct p2pmem_vma *pv = vma->vm_private_data;
+
+ if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&pv->mmap_count))
+ return;
+
+ p2pmem_vma_free_pages(vma);
+
+ dev_dbg(&pv->p2pmem_dev->dev, "vma close");
+ kfree(pv);
+}
+
+static int p2pmem_vma_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
+{
+ struct p2pmem_vma *pv = vmf->vma->vm_private_data;
+ unsigned int pg_idx;
+ struct page *pg;
+ pfn_t pfn;
+ int rc;
+
+ if (!pv->p2pmem_dev->alive)
+ return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
+
+ pg_idx = (vmf->address - vmf->vma->vm_start) / PAGE_SIZE;
+
+ mutex_lock(&pv->mutex);
+
+ if (pv->used_pages[pg_idx])
+ pg = pv->used_pages[pg_idx];
+ else
+ pg = p2pmem_alloc_page(pv->p2pmem_dev);
+
+ if (!pg)
+ return VM_FAULT_OOM;
+
+ pv->used_pages[pg_idx] = pg;
+
+ pfn = phys_to_pfn_t(page_to_phys(pg), PFN_DEV | PFN_MAP);
+ rc = vm_insert_mixed(vmf->vma, vmf->address, pfn);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&pv->mutex);
+
+ if (rc == -ENOMEM)
+ return VM_FAULT_OOM;
+ if (rc < 0 && rc != -EBUSY)
+ return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
+
+ return VM_FAULT_NOPAGE;
+}
+
+const struct vm_operations_struct p2pmem_vmops = {
+ .open = p2pmem_vma_open,
+ .close = p2pmem_vma_close,
+ .fault = p2pmem_vma_fault,
+};
+
+static int p2pmem_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
+{
+ struct p2pmem_dev *p;
+
+ p = container_of(inode->i_cdev, struct p2pmem_dev, cdev);
+ filp->private_data = p;
+ p->inode = inode;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int p2pmem_mmap(struct file *filp, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+ struct p2pmem_dev *p = filp->private_data;
+ struct p2pmem_vma *pv;
+ size_t nr_pages = (vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start) / PAGE_SIZE;
+
+ if ((vma->vm_flags & VM_MAYSHARE) != VM_MAYSHARE) {
+ dev_warn(&p->dev, "mmap failed: can't create private mapping\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ dev_dbg(&p->dev, "Allocating mmap with %zd pages.\n", nr_pages);
+
+ pv = kzalloc(sizeof(*pv) + sizeof(pv->used_pages[0]) * nr_pages,
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!pv)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ mutex_init(&pv->mutex);
+ pv->nr_pages = nr_pages;
+ pv->p2pmem_dev = p;
+ atomic_set(&pv->mmap_count, 1);
+
+ vma->vm_private_data = pv;
+ vma->vm_ops = &p2pmem_vmops;
+ vma->vm_flags |= VM_MIXEDMAP;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct file_operations p2pmem_fops = {
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+ .open = p2pmem_open,
+ .mmap = p2pmem_mmap,
+};
+
static void p2pmem_percpu_release(struct percpu_ref *ref)
{
struct p2pmem_dev *p = container_of(ref, struct p2pmem_dev, ref);
@@ -114,10 +258,23 @@ struct remove_callback {
static void p2pmem_remove(struct p2pmem_dev *p)
{
struct remove_callback *remove_call, *tmp;
+ struct vm_area_struct *vma;
p->alive = false;
list_for_each_entry_safe(remove_call, tmp, &p->remove_list, list)
remove_call->callback(remove_call->context);
+
+ if (!p->inode)
+ return;
+
+ unmap_mapping_range(p->inode->i_mapping, 0, 0, 1);
+
+ i_mmap_lock_write(p->inode->i_mapping);
+ vma_interval_tree_foreach(vma, &p->inode->i_mapping->i_mmap, 0,
+ ULONG_MAX) {
+ p2pmem_vma_free_pages(vma);
+ }
+ i_mmap_unlock_write(p->inode->i_mapping);
}
/**
@@ -147,6 +304,10 @@ struct p2pmem_dev *p2pmem_create(struct device *parent)
p->dev.parent = parent;
p->dev.release = p2pmem_release;
+ cdev_init(&p->cdev, &p2pmem_fops);
+ p->cdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
+ p->cdev.kobj.parent = &p->dev.kobj;
+
p->id = ida_simple_get(&p2pmem_ida, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
if (p->id < 0) {
rc = p->id;
@@ -154,6 +315,7 @@ struct p2pmem_dev *p2pmem_create(struct device *parent)
}
dev_set_name(&p->dev, "p2pmem%d", p->id);
+ p->dev.devt = MKDEV(MAJOR(p2pmem_devt), p->id);
p->pool = gen_pool_create(PAGE_SHIFT, nid);
if (!p->pool) {
@@ -177,14 +339,20 @@ struct p2pmem_dev *p2pmem_create(struct device *parent)
setup_debugfs(p);
}
- rc = device_add(&p->dev);
+ rc = cdev_add(&p->cdev, p->dev.devt, 1);
if (rc)
goto err_id;
- dev_info(&p->dev, "registered");
+ rc = device_add(&p->dev);
+ if (rc)
+ goto err_cdev;
+ dev_info(&p->dev, "registered");
return p;
+err_cdev:
+ cdev_del(&p->cdev);
+ p2pmem_remove(p);
err_id:
ida_simple_remove(&p2pmem_ida, p->id);
err_free:
@@ -206,6 +374,7 @@ void p2pmem_unregister(struct p2pmem_dev *p)
dev_info(&p->dev, "unregistered");
device_del(&p->dev);
+ cdev_del(&p->cdev);
p2pmem_remove(p);
ida_simple_remove(&p2pmem_ida, p->id);
put_device(&p->dev);
@@ -495,21 +664,32 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(p2pmem_put);
static int __init p2pmem_init(void)
{
+ int rc;
+
p2pmem_class = class_create(THIS_MODULE, "p2pmem");
if (IS_ERR(p2pmem_class))
return PTR_ERR(p2pmem_class);
+ rc = alloc_chrdev_region(&p2pmem_devt, 0, max_devices, "iopmemc");
+ if (rc)
+ goto err_chrdev;
+
p2pmem_debugfs_root = debugfs_create_dir("p2pmem", NULL);
if (!p2pmem_debugfs_root)
pr_info("could not create debugfs entry, continuing\n");
return 0;
+
+err_chrdev:
+ class_destroy(p2pmem_class);
+ return rc;
}
module_init(p2pmem_init);
static void __exit p2pmem_exit(void)
{
debugfs_remove_recursive(p2pmem_debugfs_root);
+ unregister_chrdev_region(p2pmem_devt, max_devices);
class_destroy(p2pmem_class);
pr_info(KBUILD_MODNAME ": unloaded.\n");
diff --git a/include/linux/p2pmem.h b/include/linux/p2pmem.h
index 9365b02..aeee60d 100644
--- a/include/linux/p2pmem.h
+++ b/include/linux/p2pmem.h
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
#include <linux/device.h>
#include <linux/pci.h>
+#include <linux/cdev.h>
struct p2pmem_dev {
struct device dev;
@@ -32,6 +33,9 @@ struct p2pmem_dev {
struct mutex remove_mutex; /* protects the remove callback list */
struct list_head remove_list;
+
+ struct cdev cdev;
+ struct inode *inode;
};
#ifdef CONFIG_P2PMEM
--
2.1.4
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-31 00:20 +0200 |
| Subject | [RFC 7/8] p2pmem: Support device removal |
| Message-ID | <tqQAb-4sB-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1613515 |
This patch creates a list of callbacks to notify users of this memory
that the p2pmem device is going away or gone.
In nvmet-rdma, we disconnect any queue using p2p memory.
The remote side will then automatically reconnect in a
couple seconds and regular system memory (or a different p2pmem device)
will be used.
Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Bates <sbates@raithlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com>
---
drivers/memory/p2pmem.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
drivers/nvme/target/rdma.c | 98 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
include/linux/p2pmem.h | 19 +++++++--
3 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/memory/p2pmem.c b/drivers/memory/p2pmem.c
index 71741c2..499d42c 100644
--- a/drivers/memory/p2pmem.c
+++ b/drivers/memory/p2pmem.c
@@ -105,6 +105,21 @@ static void p2pmem_release(struct device *dev)
kfree(p);
}
+struct remove_callback {
+ struct list_head list;
+ void (*callback)(void *context);
+ void *context;
+};
+
+static void p2pmem_remove(struct p2pmem_dev *p)
+{
+ struct remove_callback *remove_call, *tmp;
+
+ p->alive = false;
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(remove_call, tmp, &p->remove_list, list)
+ remove_call->callback(remove_call->context);
+}
+
/**
* p2pmem_create() - create a new p2pmem device
* @parent: the parent device to create it under
@@ -123,6 +138,10 @@ struct p2pmem_dev *p2pmem_create(struct device *parent)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
init_completion(&p->cmp);
+ mutex_init(&p->remove_mutex);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->remove_list);
+ p->alive = true;
+
device_initialize(&p->dev);
p->dev.class = p2pmem_class;
p->dev.parent = parent;
@@ -187,6 +206,7 @@ void p2pmem_unregister(struct p2pmem_dev *p)
dev_info(&p->dev, "unregistered");
device_del(&p->dev);
+ p2pmem_remove(p);
ida_simple_remove(&p2pmem_ida, p->id);
put_device(&p->dev);
}
@@ -291,6 +311,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(p2pmem_add_pci_region);
*/
void *p2pmem_alloc(struct p2pmem_dev *p, size_t size)
{
+ if (!p->alive)
+ return NULL;
+
return (void *)gen_pool_alloc(p->pool, size);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(p2pmem_alloc);
@@ -349,6 +372,9 @@ static int upstream_bridges_match(struct device *p2pmem,
struct pci_dev *p2p_up;
struct pci_dev *dma_up;
+ if (!to_p2pmem(p2pmem)->alive)
+ return false;
+
p2p_up = get_upstream_switch_port(p2pmem);
if (!p2p_up) {
dev_warn(p2pmem, "p2pmem is not behind a pci switch");
@@ -383,6 +409,8 @@ static int upstream_bridges_match(struct device *p2pmem,
* specified devices
* @dma_devices: a null terminated array of device pointers which
* all must be compatible with the returned p2pmem device
+ * @remove_callback: this callback will be called if the p2pmem
+ * device is removed.
*
* For now, we only support cases where all the devices that
* will transfer to the p2pmem device are on the same switch.
@@ -400,9 +428,13 @@ static int upstream_bridges_match(struct device *p2pmem,
* (use p2pmem_put to return the reference) or NULL if no compatible
* p2pmem device is found.
*/
-struct p2pmem_dev *p2pmem_find_compat(struct device **dma_devices)
+struct p2pmem_dev *p2pmem_find_compat(struct device **dma_devices,
+ void (*remove_callback)(void *context),
+ void *context)
{
struct device *dev;
+ struct p2pmem_dev *p;
+ struct remove_callback *remove_call;
dev = class_find_device(p2pmem_class, NULL, dma_devices,
upstream_bridges_match);
@@ -410,21 +442,54 @@ struct p2pmem_dev *p2pmem_find_compat(struct device **dma_devices)
if (!dev)
return NULL;
- return to_p2pmem(dev);
+ p = to_p2pmem(dev);
+ mutex_lock(&p->remove_mutex);
+
+ if (!p->alive) {
+ p = NULL;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ remove_call = kzalloc(sizeof(*remove_call), GFP_KERNEL);
+ remove_call->callback = remove_callback;
+ remove_call->context = context;
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&remove_call->list);
+ list_add(&remove_call->list, &p->remove_list);
+
+out:
+ mutex_unlock(&p->remove_mutex);
+ return p;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(p2pmem_find_compat);
/**
* p2pmem_put() - decrement a p2pmem device reference
* @p: p2pmem device to return
+ * @data: data pointer that was passed to p2pmem_find_compat
*
* Dereference and free (if last) the device's reference counter.
* It's safe to pass a NULL pointer to this function.
*/
-void p2pmem_put(struct p2pmem_dev *p)
+void p2pmem_put(struct p2pmem_dev *p, void *context)
{
- if (p)
- put_device(&p->dev);
+ struct remove_callback *remove_call;
+
+ if (!p)
+ return;
+
+ mutex_lock(&p->remove_mutex);
+
+ list_for_each_entry(remove_call, &p->remove_list, list) {
+ if (remove_call->context != context)
+ continue;
+
+ list_del(&remove_call->list);
+ kfree(remove_call);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ mutex_unlock(&p->remove_mutex);
+ put_device(&p->dev);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(p2pmem_put);
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/rdma.c b/drivers/nvme/target/rdma.c
index abab544..9ebcda6 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/target/rdma.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/target/rdma.c
@@ -1008,7 +1008,7 @@ static void nvmet_rdma_free_queue(struct nvmet_rdma_queue *queue)
!queue->host_qid);
}
nvmet_rdma_free_rsps(queue);
- p2pmem_put(queue->p2pmem);
+ p2pmem_put(queue->p2pmem, queue);
ida_simple_remove(&nvmet_rdma_queue_ida, queue->idx);
kfree(queue);
}
@@ -1204,6 +1204,58 @@ static int nvmet_rdma_cm_accept(struct rdma_cm_id *cm_id,
return ret;
}
+static void __nvmet_rdma_queue_disconnect(struct nvmet_rdma_queue *queue)
+{
+ bool disconnect = false;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ pr_debug("cm_id= %p queue->state= %d\n", queue->cm_id, queue->state);
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&queue->state_lock, flags);
+ switch (queue->state) {
+ case NVMET_RDMA_Q_CONNECTING:
+ case NVMET_RDMA_Q_LIVE:
+ queue->state = NVMET_RDMA_Q_DISCONNECTING;
+ case NVMET_RDMA_IN_DEVICE_REMOVAL:
+ disconnect = true;
+ break;
+ case NVMET_RDMA_Q_DISCONNECTING:
+ break;
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&queue->state_lock, flags);
+
+ if (disconnect) {
+ rdma_disconnect(queue->cm_id);
+ schedule_work(&queue->release_work);
+ }
+}
+
+static void nvmet_rdma_queue_disconnect(struct nvmet_rdma_queue *queue)
+{
+ bool disconnect = false;
+
+ mutex_lock(&nvmet_rdma_queue_mutex);
+ if (!list_empty(&queue->queue_list)) {
+ list_del_init(&queue->queue_list);
+ disconnect = true;
+ }
+ mutex_unlock(&nvmet_rdma_queue_mutex);
+
+ if (disconnect)
+ __nvmet_rdma_queue_disconnect(queue);
+}
+
+static void nvmet_rdma_p2pmem_remove(void *context)
+{
+ struct nvmet_rdma_queue *queue = context;
+
+ if (!queue->p2pmem)
+ return;
+
+ nvmet_rdma_queue_disconnect(queue);
+ flush_scheduled_work();
+}
+
/*
* If allow_p2pmem is set, we will try to use P2P memory for our
* sgl lists. This requires the p2pmem device to be compatible with
@@ -1241,7 +1293,8 @@ static void nvmet_rdma_queue_setup_p2pmem(struct nvmet_rdma_queue *queue)
dma_devs[i++] = NULL;
- queue->p2pmem = p2pmem_find_compat(dma_devs);
+ queue->p2pmem = p2pmem_find_compat(dma_devs, nvmet_rdma_p2pmem_remove,
+ queue);
if (queue->p2pmem)
pr_debug("using %s for rdma nvme target queue",
@@ -1317,47 +1370,6 @@ static void nvmet_rdma_queue_established(struct nvmet_rdma_queue *queue)
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&queue->state_lock, flags);
}
-static void __nvmet_rdma_queue_disconnect(struct nvmet_rdma_queue *queue)
-{
- bool disconnect = false;
- unsigned long flags;
-
- pr_debug("cm_id= %p queue->state= %d\n", queue->cm_id, queue->state);
-
- spin_lock_irqsave(&queue->state_lock, flags);
- switch (queue->state) {
- case NVMET_RDMA_Q_CONNECTING:
- case NVMET_RDMA_Q_LIVE:
- queue->state = NVMET_RDMA_Q_DISCONNECTING;
- case NVMET_RDMA_IN_DEVICE_REMOVAL:
- disconnect = true;
- break;
- case NVMET_RDMA_Q_DISCONNECTING:
- break;
- }
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&queue->state_lock, flags);
-
- if (disconnect) {
- rdma_disconnect(queue->cm_id);
- schedule_work(&queue->release_work);
- }
-}
-
-static void nvmet_rdma_queue_disconnect(struct nvmet_rdma_queue *queue)
-{
- bool disconnect = false;
-
- mutex_lock(&nvmet_rdma_queue_mutex);
- if (!list_empty(&queue->queue_list)) {
- list_del_init(&queue->queue_list);
- disconnect = true;
- }
- mutex_unlock(&nvmet_rdma_queue_mutex);
-
- if (disconnect)
- __nvmet_rdma_queue_disconnect(queue);
-}
-
static void nvmet_rdma_queue_connect_fail(struct rdma_cm_id *cm_id,
struct nvmet_rdma_queue *queue)
{
diff --git a/include/linux/p2pmem.h b/include/linux/p2pmem.h
index 4cd6f35..9365b02 100644
--- a/include/linux/p2pmem.h
+++ b/include/linux/p2pmem.h
@@ -22,12 +22,16 @@
struct p2pmem_dev {
struct device dev;
int id;
+ bool alive;
struct percpu_ref ref;
struct completion cmp;
struct gen_pool *pool;
struct dentry *debugfs_root;
+
+ struct mutex remove_mutex; /* protects the remove callback list */
+ struct list_head remove_list;
};
#ifdef CONFIG_P2PMEM
@@ -41,8 +45,12 @@ int p2pmem_add_pci_region(struct p2pmem_dev *p, struct pci_dev *pdev, int bar);
void *p2pmem_alloc(struct p2pmem_dev *p, size_t size);
void p2pmem_free(struct p2pmem_dev *p, void *addr, size_t size);
-struct p2pmem_dev *p2pmem_find_compat(struct device **dma_devices);
-void p2pmem_put(struct p2pmem_dev *p);
+struct p2pmem_dev *
+p2pmem_find_compat(struct device **dma_devices,
+ void (*unregister_callback)(void *context),
+ void *context);
+
+void p2pmem_put(struct p2pmem_dev *p, void *context);
#else
@@ -76,12 +84,15 @@ static inline void p2pmem_free(struct p2pmem_dev *p, void *addr, size_t size)
{
}
-static inline struct p2pmem_dev *p2pmem_find_compat(struct device **dma_devs)
+static inline struct p2pmem_dev *
+p2pmem_find_compat(struct device **dma_devices,
+ void (*unregister_callback)(void *context),
+ void *context)
{
return NULL;
}
-static inline void p2pmem_put(struct p2pmem_dev *p)
+static inline void p2pmem_put(struct p2pmem_dev *p, void *context)
{
}
--
2.1.4
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web