Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1617004 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-04-05 16:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-04-05 16:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH 2/4] pwm: tegra: Increase precision in pwm rate calculation Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2017-04-05 16:40 +0200
| From | Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-05 16:40 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 2/4] pwm: tegra: Increase precision in pwm rate calculation |
| Message-ID | <tsUgi-3Nd-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
The rate of the PWM calculated as follows: hz = NSEC_PER_SEC / period_ns; rate = (rate + (hz / 2)) / hz; This has the precision loss in lower PWM rate. Changing this to have more precision as: hz = DIV_ROUND_CLOSE(NSEC_PER_SEC * 100, period_ns); rate = DIV_ROUND_CLOSE(rate * 100, hz) Example: 1. period_ns = 16672000, PWM clock rate is 200KHz. Based on old formula hz = NSEC_PER_SEC / period_ns = 1000000000ul/16672000 = 59 (59.98) rate = (200K + 59/2)/59 = 3390 Based on new method: hz = 5998 rate = DIV_ROUND_CLOSE(200000*100, 5998) = 3334 If we measure the PWM signal rate, we will get more accurate period with rate value of 3334 instead of 3390. 2. period_ns = 16803898, PWM clock rate is 200KHz. Based on old formula: hz = 60, rate = 3333 Based on new formula: hz = 5951, rate = 3360 The rate of 3360 is more near to requested period then the 3333. Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> --- drivers/pwm/pwm-tegra.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-tegra.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-tegra.c index 0a688da..e9c4de5 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-tegra.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-tegra.c @@ -76,6 +76,8 @@ static int tegra_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, struct tegra_pwm_chip *pc = to_tegra_pwm_chip(chip); unsigned long long c = duty_ns; unsigned long rate, hz; + unsigned long long ns100 = NSEC_PER_SEC; + unsigned long precision = 100; /* Consider 2 digit precision */ u32 val = 0; int err; @@ -94,9 +96,11 @@ static int tegra_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, * cycles at the PWM clock rate will take period_ns nanoseconds. */ rate = clk_get_rate(pc->clk) >> PWM_DUTY_WIDTH; - hz = NSEC_PER_SEC / period_ns; - rate = (rate + (hz / 2)) / hz; + /* Consider precision in PWM_SCALE_WIDTH rate calculation */ + ns100 *= precision; + hz = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(ns100, period_ns); + rate = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(rate * precision, hz); /* * Since the actual PWM divider is the register's frequency divider -- 2.1.4
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web