Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1616992 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/mce/AMD: Carve out SMCA bank configuration

Started byBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
First post2017-04-05 16:30 +0200
Last post2017-04-05 16:30 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/mce/AMD: Carve out SMCA bank configuration Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-04-05 16:30 +0200

#1616992 — Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/mce/AMD: Carve out SMCA bank configuration

FromBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Date2017-04-05 16:30 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/mce/AMD: Carve out SMCA bank configuration
Message-ID<tsU6B-3Kb-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 12:24:32PM -0500, Yazen Ghannam wrote:
> From: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
> 
> Scalable MCA systems have a new MCA_CONFIG register that we use to
> configure each bank. We currently use this when we set up thresholding.
> However, this is logically separate.
> 
> Group all SMCA-related initialization into a single, separate function.
> This includes setting MCA_CONFIG and gathering SMCA bank info.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
> ---
> Link:
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1490210971-62346-2-git-send-email-Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com
> 
> v1->v2:
> - Merge get_smca_bank_info() and set_smca_config() into smca_configure().
> 
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_amd.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

...

> @@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ void mce_amd_feature_init(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>  
>  	for (bank = 0; bank < mca_cfg.banks; ++bank) {
>  		if (mce_flags.smca)
> -			get_smca_bank_info(bank);
> +			smca_configure(bank);

Pass in cpu from above:

			smca_configure(bank, cpu);


>  
>  		for (block = 0; block < NR_BLOCKS; ++block) {
>  			address = get_block_address(cpu, address, low, high, bank, block);
> -- 

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web