Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1613721 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86/ldt: use vfree() instead of vfree_atomic()

Started byThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
First post2017-03-31 10:10 +0200
Last post2017-03-31 10:10 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86/ldt: use vfree() instead of vfree_atomic() Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-03-31 10:10 +0200

#1613721 — Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86/ldt: use vfree() instead of vfree_atomic()

FromThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Date2017-03-31 10:10 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/4] x86/ldt: use vfree() instead of vfree_atomic()
Message-ID<tqZN8-204-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Thu, 30 Mar 2017, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:

> vfree() can be used in any atomic context now, thus there is no point
> in vfree_atomic().
> This reverts commit 8d5341a6260a ("x86/ldt: use vfree_atomic()
> to free ldt entries")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>

Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web