Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1612856 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-03-30 12:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-03-30 12:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH 4.9 15/16] sched/rt: Add a missing rescheduling point Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-03-30 12:20 +0200
| From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-30 12:20 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 4.9 15/16] sched/rt: Add a missing rescheduling point |
| Message-ID | <tqFln-4ME-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
commit 619bd4a71874a8fd78eb6ccf9f272c5e98bcc7b7 upstream.
Since the change in commit:
fd7a4bed1835 ("sched, rt: Convert switched_{from, to}_rt() / prio_changed_rt() to balance callbacks")
... we don't reschedule a task under certain circumstances:
Lets say task-A, SCHED_OTHER, is running on CPU0 (and it may run only on
CPU0) and holds a PI lock. This task is removed from the CPU because it
used up its time slice and another SCHED_OTHER task is running. Task-B on
CPU1 runs at RT priority and asks for the lock owned by task-A. This
results in a priority boost for task-A. Task-B goes to sleep until the
lock has been made available. Task-A is already runnable (but not active),
so it receives no wake up.
The reality now is that task-A gets on the CPU once the scheduler decides
to remove the current task despite the fact that a high priority task is
enqueued and waiting. This may take a long time.
The desired behaviour is that CPU0 immediately reschedules after the
priority boost which made task-A the task with the lowest priority.
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Fixes: fd7a4bed1835 ("sched, rt: Convert switched_{from, to}_rt() prio_changed_rt() to balance callbacks")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170124144006.29821-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 3 +--
kernel/sched/rt.c | 3 +--
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -1729,12 +1729,11 @@ static void switched_to_dl(struct rq *rq
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
if (tsk_nr_cpus_allowed(p) > 1 && rq->dl.overloaded)
queue_push_tasks(rq);
-#else
+#endif
if (dl_task(rq->curr))
check_preempt_curr_dl(rq, p, 0);
else
resched_curr(rq);
-#endif
}
}
--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -2198,10 +2198,9 @@ static void switched_to_rt(struct rq *rq
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
if (tsk_nr_cpus_allowed(p) > 1 && rq->rt.overloaded)
queue_push_tasks(rq);
-#else
+#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
if (p->prio < rq->curr->prio)
resched_curr(rq);
-#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
}
}
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web