Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1612928 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH] serial: Do not treat the IIR register as a bitfield

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH] serial: Do not treat the IIR register as a bitfield Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-30 12:40 +0200
    Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH] serial: Do not treat the IIR register as a  bitfield Fengguang Wu <lkp@intel.com> - 2017-03-30 13:30 +0200

#1612928 — Re: [PATCH] serial: Do not treat the IIR register as a bitfield

On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 18:22 +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:

>    drivers/net//irda/smsc-ircc2.c:

> > > drivers/net//irda/smsc-ircc2.c:

Just out of my curiosity, why do we have // in some reports?

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1612971 — Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH] serial: Do not treat the IIR register as a bitfield

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 01:32:51PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 18:22 +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
>
>>    drivers/net//irda/smsc-ircc2.c:
>
>> > > drivers/net//irda/smsc-ircc2.c:
>
>Just out of my curiosity, why do we have // in some reports?

Log shows the bisect runs

        make M=drivers/net/

That should explain the // in error messages.

Thanks,
Fengguang

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web