Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1612713 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-03-30 10:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-03-30 10:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v12 00/10] mux controller abstraction and iio/i2c muxes Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-03-30 10:20 +0200
| From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-30 10:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v12 00/10] mux controller abstraction and iio/i2c muxes |
| Message-ID | <tqDth-3qZ-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 09:34:52AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2017-03-27 16:21, Peter Rosin wrote: > > Hi Greg! > > > > Please apply. > > > > *snip snip* > > > v10 -> v11 changes > > - added a new patch (12) with a fix for messed up error path reported > > by Paul Gortmaker. > > Oops, should be Dan Carpenter. Sorry about that... > > And, I forgot to high-light this: > > > v4 -> v5 changes > > - driver for Analog Devices ADG792A/G, literally the first mux chip > > I found on the Internet with an i2c interface (that was not a > > dedicated i2c multiplexer like PCA9547) which I used to verify > > that the abstractions in the mux core are up to the task. Untested, > > just proof of concept that at least looks pretty and compiles... > > Maybe the patches related to adg792 (last two patches in v12) should > not be applied? I don't care much either way, your call Greg... Give me a chance to catch up on reviews, your patch series is behind 400+ other emails... greg k-h
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web