Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1610277 > unrolled thread
| Started by | David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-03-28 06:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-03-28 12:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v2] net: moxa: fix TX overrun memory leak David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2017-03-28 06:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] net: moxa: fix TX overrun memory leak Jonas Jensen <jonas.jensen@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 12:20 +0200
| From | David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-28 06:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] net: moxa: fix TX overrun memory leak |
| Message-ID | <tpQsx-1Jz-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
From: Jonas Jensen <jonas.jensen@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 14:31:19 +0200 > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ > #include <linux/of_irq.h> > #include <linux/crc32.h> > #include <linux/crc32c.h> > +#include <linux/circ_buf.h> > > #include "moxart_ether.h" > > @@ -297,6 +298,7 @@ static void moxart_tx_finished(struct net_device *ndev) > tx_tail = TX_NEXT(tx_tail); > } > priv->tx_tail = tx_tail; > + netif_wake_queue(ndev); > } > > static irqreturn_t moxart_mac_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id) Doing the wakeup unconditionally is very wasteful, you just need to do it when enough space has been made available. Therefore the wakeup should be more like: if (netif_queue_stopped(ndev) && moxart_tx_queue_space(ndev) >= MOXART_TX_WAKEUP_THRESHOLD) netif_wake_queue(); Otherwise you're just going to flap back and forth under high load and get almost not packet batching at all, hurting performance.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jonas Jensen <jonas.jensen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-28 12:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tpWoi-65Z-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1610277 |
On 28 March 2017 at 05:50, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote: > Doing the wakeup unconditionally is very wasteful, you just need to do it > when enough space has been made available. Thanks, please see v3. Jonas
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web