Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1610505 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH] fault-inject: use correct check for interrupts

Started byDmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
First post2017-03-28 12:00 +0200
Last post2017-03-28 12:00 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH] fault-inject: use correct check for interrupts Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2017-03-28 12:00 +0200

#1610505 — Re: [PATCH] fault-inject: use correct check for interrupts

FromDmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Date2017-03-28 12:00 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH] fault-inject: use correct check for interrupts
Message-ID<tpW4W-5IO-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 8:18 AM, Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2017-03-21 18:18 GMT+09:00 Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>:
>> in_interrupt() also returns true when bh is disabled in task context.
>> That's not what fail_task() wants to check.
>> Use the new in_task() predicate that does the right thing.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
>> Cc: akinobu.mita@gmail.com
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
>
> This change looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>


Andrew, will you take this to mm please?

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web