Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1610505 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-03-28 12:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-03-28 12:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH] fault-inject: use correct check for interrupts Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2017-03-28 12:00 +0200
| From | Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-28 12:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] fault-inject: use correct check for interrupts |
| Message-ID | <tpW4W-5IO-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 8:18 AM, Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com> wrote: > 2017-03-21 18:18 GMT+09:00 Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>: >> in_interrupt() also returns true when bh is disabled in task context. >> That's not what fail_task() wants to check. >> Use the new in_task() predicate that does the right thing. >> >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> >> Cc: akinobu.mita@gmail.com >> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> >> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org > > This change looks good to me. > > Reviewed-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com> Andrew, will you take this to mm please?
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web