Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1608253 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] Staging: fbtft: Fix checkpatch warning

Started byAnar Adilova <anaradilovab@gmail.com>
First post2017-03-24 10:10 +0100
Last post2017-03-27 14:10 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH] Staging: fbtft: Fix checkpatch warning Anar Adilova <anaradilovab@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 10:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] Staging: fbtft: Fix checkpatch warning Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-03-27 14:10 +0200

#1608253 — [PATCH] Staging: fbtft: Fix checkpatch warning

FromAnar Adilova <anaradilovab@gmail.com>
Date2017-03-24 10:10 +0100
Subject[PATCH] Staging: fbtft: Fix checkpatch warning
Message-ID<toton-7Is-43@gated-at.bofh.it>
This patch fixes the checkpatch.pl warning:

EXPORT_SYMBOL(foo); should immediately follow its function/variable.

The EXPORT_SYMBOL statements are placed inside if blocks, after both function implementations.

Signed-off-by: Anar Adilova <anaradilovab@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c
index b742ee7..d2e3e8d 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c
@@ -284,6 +284,7 @@ void fbtft_unregister_backlight(struct fbtft_par *par)
 		par->info->bl_dev = NULL;
 	}
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(fbtft_unregister_backlight);
 
 static const struct backlight_ops fbtft_bl_ops = {
 	.get_brightness	= fbtft_backlight_get_brightness,
@@ -321,12 +322,13 @@ void fbtft_register_backlight(struct fbtft_par *par)
 	if (!par->fbtftops.unregister_backlight)
 		par->fbtftops.unregister_backlight = fbtft_unregister_backlight;
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(fbtft_register_backlight);
 #else
 void fbtft_register_backlight(struct fbtft_par *par) { };
-void fbtft_unregister_backlight(struct fbtft_par *par) { };
-#endif
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(fbtft_register_backlight);
+void fbtft_unregister_backlight(struct fbtft_par *par) { };
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(fbtft_unregister_backlight);
+#endif
 
 static void fbtft_set_addr_win(struct fbtft_par *par, int xs, int ys, int xe,
 			       int ye)
-- 
2.9.3

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1609762

FromGreg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date2017-03-27 14:10 +0200
Message-ID<tpBDc-7On-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1608253
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 03:02:45PM +0600, Anar Adilova wrote:
> This patch fixes the checkpatch.pl warning:
> 
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(foo); should immediately follow its function/variable.
> 
> The EXPORT_SYMBOL statements are placed inside if blocks, after both function implementations.
>

Please always wrap your changelog text at 72 columns.

> Signed-off-by: Anar Adilova <anaradilovab@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c
> index b742ee7..d2e3e8d 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c
> @@ -284,6 +284,7 @@ void fbtft_unregister_backlight(struct fbtft_par *par)
>  		par->info->bl_dev = NULL;
>  	}
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(fbtft_unregister_backlight);
>  
>  static const struct backlight_ops fbtft_bl_ops = {
>  	.get_brightness	= fbtft_backlight_get_brightness,
> @@ -321,12 +322,13 @@ void fbtft_register_backlight(struct fbtft_par *par)
>  	if (!par->fbtftops.unregister_backlight)
>  		par->fbtftops.unregister_backlight = fbtft_unregister_backlight;
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(fbtft_register_backlight);
>  #else
>  void fbtft_register_backlight(struct fbtft_par *par) { };
> -void fbtft_unregister_backlight(struct fbtft_par *par) { };
> -#endif
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(fbtft_register_backlight);
> +void fbtft_unregister_backlight(struct fbtft_par *par) { };
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(fbtft_unregister_backlight);
> +#endif

No, the original code here is "nicer" in that you don't have duplicate
declarations like your change added.

You can ignore the checkpatch warning here.

thanks,

greg k-h

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web