Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1608103 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-03-24 04:40 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-03-24 08:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with the tpmdd tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-03-24 04:40 +0100
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with the tpmdd tree Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> - 2017-03-24 08:40 +0100
| From | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-24 04:40 +0100 |
| Subject | linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with the tpmdd tree |
| Message-ID | <tooeZ-3UX-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the char-misc tree got a conflict in:
drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
between commits:
67b67480db8b ("tpm: infrastructure for TPM spaces")
b8e3586e8536 ("tpm: expose spaces via a device link /dev/tpmrm<n>")
from the tpmdd tree and commit:
8dbbf5825181 ("tpm-chip: utilize new cdev_device_add helper function")
from the char-misc tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
index aade6995f310,935f0e92ad61..000000000000
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
@@@ -214,22 -186,7 +214,20 @@@ struct tpm_chip *tpm_chip_alloc(struct
chip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_VIRTUAL;
cdev_init(&chip->cdev, &tpm_fops);
+ cdev_init(&chip->cdevs, &tpmrm_fops);
chip->cdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
+ chip->cdevs.owner = THIS_MODULE;
- chip->cdev.kobj.parent = &chip->dev.kobj;
- chip->cdevs.kobj.parent = &chip->devs.kobj;
+
+ chip->work_space.context_buf = kzalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!chip->work_space.context_buf) {
+ rc = -ENOMEM;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ chip->work_space.session_buf = kzalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!chip->work_space.session_buf) {
+ rc = -ENOMEM;
+ goto out;
+ }
return chip;
@@@ -273,44 -229,13 +271,22 @@@ static int tpm_add_char_device(struct t
{
int rc;
- rc = cdev_add(&chip->cdev, chip->dev.devt, 1);
+ rc = cdev_device_add(&chip->cdev, &chip->dev);
if (rc) {
dev_err(&chip->dev,
- "unable to cdev_add() %s, major %d, minor %d, err=%d\n",
+ "unable to cdev_device_add() %s, major %d, minor %d, err=%d\n",
dev_name(&chip->dev), MAJOR(chip->dev.devt),
MINOR(chip->dev.devt), rc);
+ return rc;
+ }
- rc = device_add(&chip->dev);
- if (rc) {
- dev_err(&chip->dev,
- "unable to device_register() %s, major %d, minor %d, err=%d\n",
- dev_name(&chip->dev), MAJOR(chip->dev.devt),
- MINOR(chip->dev.devt), rc);
-
- cdev_del(&chip->cdev);
- return rc;
- }
-
- if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)
- rc = cdev_add(&chip->cdevs, chip->devs.devt, 1);
- if (rc) {
- dev_err(&chip->dev,
- "unable to cdev_add() %s, major %d, minor %d, err=%d\n",
- dev_name(&chip->devs), MAJOR(chip->devs.devt),
- MINOR(chip->devs.devt), rc);
- return rc;
- }
-
+ if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)
- rc = device_add(&chip->devs);
++ rc = cdev_device_add(&chip->cdevs, &chip->devs);
+ if (rc) {
+ dev_err(&chip->dev,
- "unable to device_register() %s, major %d, minor %d, err=%d\n",
++ "unable to cdev_device_add() %s, major %d, minor %d, err=%d\n",
+ dev_name(&chip->devs), MAJOR(chip->devs.devt),
+ MINOR(chip->devs.devt), rc);
- cdev_del(&chip->cdevs);
return rc;
}
@@@ -447,10 -371,6 +422,8 @@@ void tpm_chip_unregister(struct tpm_chi
{
tpm_del_legacy_sysfs(chip);
tpm_bios_log_teardown(chip);
- if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) {
- cdev_del(&chip->cdevs);
- device_del(&chip->devs);
- }
++ if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)
++ cdev_device_del(&chip->cdevs, &chip->devs);
tpm_del_char_device(chip);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_chip_unregister);
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-24 08:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with the tpmdd tree |
| Message-ID | <torZf-6BK-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1608103 |
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 02:33:02PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the char-misc tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
>
> between commits:
>
> 67b67480db8b ("tpm: infrastructure for TPM spaces")
> b8e3586e8536 ("tpm: expose spaces via a device link /dev/tpmrm<n>")
>
> from the tpmdd tree and commit:
>
> 8dbbf5825181 ("tpm-chip: utilize new cdev_device_add helper function")
>
> from the char-misc tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> index aade6995f310,935f0e92ad61..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> @@@ -214,22 -186,7 +214,20 @@@ struct tpm_chip *tpm_chip_alloc(struct
> chip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_VIRTUAL;
>
> cdev_init(&chip->cdev, &tpm_fops);
> + cdev_init(&chip->cdevs, &tpmrm_fops);
> chip->cdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> + chip->cdevs.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> - chip->cdev.kobj.parent = &chip->dev.kobj;
> - chip->cdevs.kobj.parent = &chip->devs.kobj;
> +
> + chip->work_space.context_buf = kzalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!chip->work_space.context_buf) {
> + rc = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + chip->work_space.session_buf = kzalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!chip->work_space.session_buf) {
> + rc = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out;
> + }
>
> return chip;
>
> @@@ -273,44 -229,13 +271,22 @@@ static int tpm_add_char_device(struct t
> {
> int rc;
>
> - rc = cdev_add(&chip->cdev, chip->dev.devt, 1);
> + rc = cdev_device_add(&chip->cdev, &chip->dev);
> if (rc) {
> dev_err(&chip->dev,
> - "unable to cdev_add() %s, major %d, minor %d, err=%d\n",
> + "unable to cdev_device_add() %s, major %d, minor %d, err=%d\n",
> dev_name(&chip->dev), MAJOR(chip->dev.devt),
> MINOR(chip->dev.devt), rc);
> + return rc;
> + }
>
> - rc = device_add(&chip->dev);
> - if (rc) {
> - dev_err(&chip->dev,
> - "unable to device_register() %s, major %d, minor %d, err=%d\n",
> - dev_name(&chip->dev), MAJOR(chip->dev.devt),
> - MINOR(chip->dev.devt), rc);
> -
> - cdev_del(&chip->cdev);
> - return rc;
> - }
> -
> - if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)
> - rc = cdev_add(&chip->cdevs, chip->devs.devt, 1);
> - if (rc) {
> - dev_err(&chip->dev,
> - "unable to cdev_add() %s, major %d, minor %d, err=%d\n",
> - dev_name(&chip->devs), MAJOR(chip->devs.devt),
> - MINOR(chip->devs.devt), rc);
> - return rc;
> - }
> -
> + if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)
> - rc = device_add(&chip->devs);
> ++ rc = cdev_device_add(&chip->cdevs, &chip->devs);
> + if (rc) {
> + dev_err(&chip->dev,
> - "unable to device_register() %s, major %d, minor %d, err=%d\n",
> ++ "unable to cdev_device_add() %s, major %d, minor %d, err=%d\n",
> + dev_name(&chip->devs), MAJOR(chip->devs.devt),
> + MINOR(chip->devs.devt), rc);
> - cdev_del(&chip->cdevs);
> return rc;
> }
>
> @@@ -447,10 -371,6 +422,8 @@@ void tpm_chip_unregister(struct tpm_chi
> {
> tpm_del_legacy_sysfs(chip);
> tpm_bios_log_teardown(chip);
> - if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) {
> - cdev_del(&chip->cdevs);
> - device_del(&chip->devs);
> - }
> ++ if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)
> ++ cdev_device_del(&chip->cdevs, &chip->devs);
> tpm_del_char_device(chip);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_chip_unregister);
Looks good to me, thanks!
greg k-h
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web