Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1607549 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH] arm64: kconfig: allow support for memory failure handling

Started byJames Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
First post2017-03-23 15:40 +0100
Last post2017-03-24 17:40 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH] arm64: kconfig: allow support for memory failure handling James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> - 2017-03-23 15:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] arm64: kconfig: allow support for memory failure handling "Baicar, Tyler" <tbaicar@codeaurora.org> - 2017-03-24 17:40 +0100

#1607549 — Re: [PATCH] arm64: kconfig: allow support for memory failure handling

FromJames Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Date2017-03-23 15:40 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH] arm64: kconfig: allow support for memory failure handling
Message-ID<toc4a-3pL-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi Punit,

On 01/02/17 21:38, Tyler Baicar wrote:
> From: "Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang" <zjzhang@codeaurora.org>
> 
> If ACPI_APEI and MEMORY_FAILURE is configured, select
> ACPI_APEI_MEMORY_FAILURE. This enables memory failure recovery
> when such memory failure is reported through ACPI APEI. APEI
> (ACPI Platform Error Interfaces) provides a means for the
> platform to convey error information to the kernel.
> 
> Declare ARCH_SUPPORTS_MEMORY_FAILURE, as arm64 does support
> memory failure recovery attempt.

Am I right in thinking we should wait for the hugepage issue you found with
hwpoison [0] to be fixed before arm64 can have ARCH_SUPPORTS_MEMORY_FAILURE?

(If so, can this patch become part of that series to they are obviously related!)

Thanks,

James

[0] https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg568995.html




> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index f92778d..4cd12a0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ config ARM64
>  	select ARCH_HAS_SG_CHAIN
>  	select ARCH_HAS_TICK_BROADCAST if GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST
>  	select ARCH_USE_CMPXCHG_LOCKREF
> +	select ACPI_APEI_MEMORY_FAILURE if ACPI_APEI && MEMORY_FAILURE
> +	select ARCH_SUPPORTS_MEMORY_FAILURE
>  	select ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW
>  	select ARCH_SUPPORTS_NUMA_BALANCING
>  	select ARCH_WANT_COMPAT_IPC_PARSE_VERSION
> 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1608657

From"Baicar, Tyler" <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
Date2017-03-24 17:40 +0100
Message-ID<toApP-4fB-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1607549
On 3/23/2017 10:12 AM, Punit Agrawal wrote:
>
>
> On 23/03/17 14:33, James Morse wrote:
>> Hi Punit,
>>
>> On 01/02/17 21:38, Tyler Baicar wrote:
>>> From: "Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang" <zjzhang@codeaurora.org>
>>>
>>> If ACPI_APEI and MEMORY_FAILURE is configured, select
>>> ACPI_APEI_MEMORY_FAILURE. This enables memory failure recovery
>>> when such memory failure is reported through ACPI APEI. APEI
>>> (ACPI Platform Error Interfaces) provides a means for the
>>> platform to convey error information to the kernel.
>>>
>>> Declare ARCH_SUPPORTS_MEMORY_FAILURE, as arm64 does support
>>> memory failure recovery attempt.
>>
>> Am I right in thinking we should wait for the hugepage issue you 
>> found with
>> hwpoison [0] to be fixed before arm64 can have 
>> ARCH_SUPPORTS_MEMORY_FAILURE?
>
> We should at the least fix the huge_pte_offset() issue discovered in [0]
> before we enable memory failure handling. Earlier today I posted a
> RFC[1] fix for it based on Catalin's suggestion.
>
>>
>> (If so, can this patch become part of that series to they are 
>> obviously related!)
>
> Good point - I can include the patches enabling memory failure handling
> on ARM64 if Tyler's fine with it.
That's fine with me!

Thanks,
Tyler
>
> Thanks,
> Punit
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/3/23/293
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> James
>>
>> [0] https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg568995.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>>> index f92778d..4cd12a0 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>>> @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ config ARM64
>>>      select ARCH_HAS_SG_CHAIN
>>>      select ARCH_HAS_TICK_BROADCAST if GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST
>>>      select ARCH_USE_CMPXCHG_LOCKREF
>>> +    select ACPI_APEI_MEMORY_FAILURE if ACPI_APEI && MEMORY_FAILURE
>>> +    select ARCH_SUPPORTS_MEMORY_FAILURE
>>>      select ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW
>>>      select ARCH_SUPPORTS_NUMA_BALANCING
>>>      select ARCH_WANT_COMPAT_IPC_PARSE_VERSION
>>>
>>
>>
>>
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are 
> confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended 
> recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose 
> the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or 
> copy the information in any medium. Thank you.

-- 
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web