Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1601893 > unrolled thread
| Started by | js1304@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-03-16 03:50 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-03-27 10:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 4 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH 4/4] zram: make deduplication feature optional js1304@gmail.com - 2017-03-16 03:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 4/4] zram: make deduplication feature optional Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> - 2017-03-22 01:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 4/4] zram: make deduplication feature optional Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2017-03-23 04:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 4/4] zram: make deduplication feature optional Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 10:20 +0200
| From | js1304@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-16 03:50 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH 4/4] zram: make deduplication feature optional |
| Message-ID | <tltEd-8qE-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Benefit of deduplication is dependent on the workload so it's not
preferable to always enable. Therefore, make it optional.
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
---
drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
index 012425f..e45aa9f 100644
--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -328,6 +328,39 @@ static ssize_t comp_algorithm_store(struct device *dev,
return len;
}
+static ssize_t use_dedup_show(struct device *dev,
+ struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+{
+ int val;
+ struct zram *zram = dev_to_zram(dev);
+
+ down_read(&zram->init_lock);
+ val = zram->use_dedup;
+ up_read(&zram->init_lock);
+
+ return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%d\n", val);
+}
+
+static ssize_t use_dedup_store(struct device *dev,
+ struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t len)
+{
+ int val;
+ struct zram *zram = dev_to_zram(dev);
+
+ if (kstrtoint(buf, 10, &val) || (val != 0 && val != 1))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ down_write(&zram->init_lock);
+ if (init_done(zram)) {
+ up_write(&zram->init_lock);
+ pr_info("Can't change dedup usage for initialized device\n");
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
+ zram->use_dedup = val;
+ up_write(&zram->init_lock);
+ return len;
+}
+
static ssize_t compact_store(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t len)
{
@@ -422,11 +455,23 @@ static ssize_t debug_stat_show(struct device *dev,
static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(mm_stat);
static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(debug_stat);
-static u32 zram_calc_checksum(unsigned char *mem)
+static u32 zram_calc_checksum(struct zram *zram, unsigned char *mem)
{
+ if (!zram->use_dedup)
+ return 0;
+
return jhash(mem, PAGE_SIZE, 0);
}
+static unsigned long zram_entry_handle(struct zram *zram,
+ struct zram_entry *entry)
+{
+ if (!zram->use_dedup)
+ return (unsigned long)entry;
+
+ return entry->handle;
+}
+
static struct zram_entry *zram_entry_alloc(struct zram *zram,
unsigned int len, gfp_t flags)
{
@@ -438,6 +483,9 @@ static struct zram_entry *zram_entry_alloc(struct zram *zram,
if (!handle)
return NULL;
+ if (!zram->use_dedup)
+ return (struct zram_entry *)handle;
+
entry = kzalloc(sizeof(*entry), flags);
if (!entry) {
zs_free(meta->mem_pool, handle);
@@ -462,6 +510,9 @@ static void zram_entry_insert(struct zram *zram, struct zram_entry *new,
struct rb_node **rb_node, *parent = NULL;
struct zram_entry *entry;
+ if (!zram->use_dedup)
+ return;
+
new->checksum = checksum;
hash = &meta->hash[checksum % meta->hash_size];
rb_root = &hash->rb_root;
@@ -492,7 +543,8 @@ static bool zram_entry_match(struct zram *zram, struct zram_entry *entry,
struct zram_meta *meta = zram->meta;
struct zcomp_strm *zstrm;
- cmem = zs_map_object(meta->mem_pool, entry->handle, ZS_MM_RO);
+ cmem = zs_map_object(meta->mem_pool,
+ zram_entry_handle(zram, entry), ZS_MM_RO);
if (entry->len == PAGE_SIZE) {
match = !memcmp(mem, cmem, PAGE_SIZE);
} else {
@@ -501,7 +553,7 @@ static bool zram_entry_match(struct zram *zram, struct zram_entry *entry,
match = !memcmp(mem, zstrm->buffer, PAGE_SIZE);
zcomp_stream_put(zram->comp);
}
- zs_unmap_object(meta->mem_pool, entry->handle);
+ zs_unmap_object(meta->mem_pool, zram_entry_handle(zram, entry));
return match;
}
@@ -521,6 +573,11 @@ static bool zram_entry_put(struct zram *zram, struct zram_meta *meta,
struct zram_hash *hash;
u32 checksum;
+ if (!zram->use_dedup) {
+ zs_free(meta->mem_pool, zram_entry_handle(zram, entry));
+ return false;
+ }
+
if (!populated)
goto free;
@@ -551,6 +608,9 @@ static struct zram_entry *zram_entry_get(struct zram *zram,
struct zram_entry *entry;
struct rb_node *rb_node;
+ if (!zram->use_dedup)
+ return NULL;
+
hash = &meta->hash[checksum % meta->hash_size];
spin_lock(&hash->lock);
@@ -713,7 +773,8 @@ static int zram_decompress_page(struct zram *zram, char *mem, u32 index)
return 0;
}
- cmem = zs_map_object(meta->mem_pool, entry->handle, ZS_MM_RO);
+ cmem = zs_map_object(meta->mem_pool,
+ zram_entry_handle(zram, entry), ZS_MM_RO);
if (size == PAGE_SIZE) {
copy_page(mem, cmem);
} else {
@@ -722,7 +783,7 @@ static int zram_decompress_page(struct zram *zram, char *mem, u32 index)
ret = zcomp_decompress(zstrm, cmem, size, mem);
zcomp_stream_put(zram->comp);
}
- zs_unmap_object(meta->mem_pool, entry->handle);
+ zs_unmap_object(meta->mem_pool, zram_entry_handle(zram, entry));
bit_spin_unlock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
/* Should NEVER happen. Return bio error if it does. */
@@ -840,7 +901,7 @@ static int zram_bvec_write(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec, u32 index,
goto out;
}
- checksum = zram_calc_checksum(uncmem);
+ checksum = zram_calc_checksum(zram, uncmem);
if (!entry) {
entry = zram_entry_get(zram, uncmem, checksum);
if (entry) {
@@ -915,7 +976,8 @@ static int zram_bvec_write(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec, u32 index,
goto out;
}
- cmem = zs_map_object(meta->mem_pool, entry->handle, ZS_MM_WO);
+ cmem = zs_map_object(meta->mem_pool,
+ zram_entry_handle(zram, entry), ZS_MM_WO);
if ((clen == PAGE_SIZE) && !is_partial_io(bvec)) {
src = kmap_atomic(page);
@@ -927,7 +989,7 @@ static int zram_bvec_write(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec, u32 index,
zcomp_stream_put(zram->comp);
zstrm = NULL;
- zs_unmap_object(meta->mem_pool, entry->handle);
+ zs_unmap_object(meta->mem_pool, zram_entry_handle(zram, entry));
zram_entry_insert(zram, entry, checksum);
found_duplication:
@@ -1310,6 +1372,7 @@ static int zram_open(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode)
static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(mem_used_max);
static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(max_comp_streams);
static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(comp_algorithm);
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(use_dedup);
static struct attribute *zram_disk_attrs[] = {
&dev_attr_disksize.attr,
@@ -1320,6 +1383,7 @@ static int zram_open(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode)
&dev_attr_mem_used_max.attr,
&dev_attr_max_comp_streams.attr,
&dev_attr_comp_algorithm.attr,
+ &dev_attr_use_dedup.attr,
&dev_attr_io_stat.attr,
&dev_attr_mm_stat.attr,
&dev_attr_debug_stat.attr,
diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h
index 07d1f8d..b823555 100644
--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h
@@ -141,5 +141,6 @@ struct zram {
* zram is claimed so open request will be failed
*/
bool claim; /* Protected by bdev->bd_mutex */
+ int use_dedup;
};
#endif
--
1.9.1
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-22 01:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tnC0G-2r8-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1601893 |
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 11:46:38AM +0900, js1304@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
>
> Benefit of deduplication is dependent on the workload so it's not
> preferable to always enable. Therefore, make it optional.
Please make it to Kconfig, too. And write down the description to impress
"help a lot for users who uses zram to build output directory"
And the feature should be disabled as default.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
> ---
> drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> index 012425f..e45aa9f 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> @@ -328,6 +328,39 @@ static ssize_t comp_algorithm_store(struct device *dev,
> return len;
> }
>
> +static ssize_t use_dedup_show(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> + int val;
> + struct zram *zram = dev_to_zram(dev);
> +
> + down_read(&zram->init_lock);
> + val = zram->use_dedup;
> + up_read(&zram->init_lock);
> +
> + return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%d\n", val);
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t use_dedup_store(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t len)
> +{
> + int val;
> + struct zram *zram = dev_to_zram(dev);
> +
> + if (kstrtoint(buf, 10, &val) || (val != 0 && val != 1))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + down_write(&zram->init_lock);
> + if (init_done(zram)) {
> + up_write(&zram->init_lock);
> + pr_info("Can't change dedup usage for initialized device\n");
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> + zram->use_dedup = val;
> + up_write(&zram->init_lock);
> + return len;
> +}
> +
> static ssize_t compact_store(struct device *dev,
> struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t len)
> {
> @@ -422,11 +455,23 @@ static ssize_t debug_stat_show(struct device *dev,
> static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(mm_stat);
> static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(debug_stat);
>
> -static u32 zram_calc_checksum(unsigned char *mem)
> +static u32 zram_calc_checksum(struct zram *zram, unsigned char *mem)
> {
> + if (!zram->use_dedup)
> + return 0;
> +
Hmm, I don't like this style which every dedup functions have the check
"use_dedup".
Can't we abstract like this?
I want to find more simple way to no need to add the check when new dedup
functions pop up.
bool zram_dedup_check
if (!zram->dedup)
return false;
zram_dedup_checksum
entry = zram_dedup_get
if (!entry) {
zram_dedup_add
return false;
}
..
return true;
zram_bvec_write:
...
...
if (zram_dedup_match())
goto found_dup;
> return jhash(mem, PAGE_SIZE, 0);
> }
>
> +static unsigned long zram_entry_handle(struct zram *zram,
> + struct zram_entry *entry)
> +{
> + if (!zram->use_dedup)
> + return (unsigned long)entry;
> +
> + return entry->handle;
> +}
> +
> static struct zram_entry *zram_entry_alloc(struct zram *zram,
> unsigned int len, gfp_t flags)
> {
> @@ -438,6 +483,9 @@ static struct zram_entry *zram_entry_alloc(struct zram *zram,
> if (!handle)
> return NULL;
>
> + if (!zram->use_dedup)
> + return (struct zram_entry *)handle;
> +
> entry = kzalloc(sizeof(*entry), flags);
> if (!entry) {
> zs_free(meta->mem_pool, handle);
> @@ -462,6 +510,9 @@ static void zram_entry_insert(struct zram *zram, struct zram_entry *new,
> struct rb_node **rb_node, *parent = NULL;
> struct zram_entry *entry;
>
> + if (!zram->use_dedup)
> + return;
> +
> new->checksum = checksum;
> hash = &meta->hash[checksum % meta->hash_size];
> rb_root = &hash->rb_root;
> @@ -492,7 +543,8 @@ static bool zram_entry_match(struct zram *zram, struct zram_entry *entry,
> struct zram_meta *meta = zram->meta;
> struct zcomp_strm *zstrm;
>
> - cmem = zs_map_object(meta->mem_pool, entry->handle, ZS_MM_RO);
> + cmem = zs_map_object(meta->mem_pool,
> + zram_entry_handle(zram, entry), ZS_MM_RO);
> if (entry->len == PAGE_SIZE) {
> match = !memcmp(mem, cmem, PAGE_SIZE);
> } else {
> @@ -501,7 +553,7 @@ static bool zram_entry_match(struct zram *zram, struct zram_entry *entry,
> match = !memcmp(mem, zstrm->buffer, PAGE_SIZE);
> zcomp_stream_put(zram->comp);
> }
> - zs_unmap_object(meta->mem_pool, entry->handle);
> + zs_unmap_object(meta->mem_pool, zram_entry_handle(zram, entry));
>
> return match;
> }
> @@ -521,6 +573,11 @@ static bool zram_entry_put(struct zram *zram, struct zram_meta *meta,
> struct zram_hash *hash;
> u32 checksum;
>
> + if (!zram->use_dedup) {
> + zs_free(meta->mem_pool, zram_entry_handle(zram, entry));
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> if (!populated)
> goto free;
>
> @@ -551,6 +608,9 @@ static struct zram_entry *zram_entry_get(struct zram *zram,
> struct zram_entry *entry;
> struct rb_node *rb_node;
>
> + if (!zram->use_dedup)
> + return NULL;
> +
> hash = &meta->hash[checksum % meta->hash_size];
>
> spin_lock(&hash->lock);
> @@ -713,7 +773,8 @@ static int zram_decompress_page(struct zram *zram, char *mem, u32 index)
> return 0;
> }
>
> - cmem = zs_map_object(meta->mem_pool, entry->handle, ZS_MM_RO);
> + cmem = zs_map_object(meta->mem_pool,
> + zram_entry_handle(zram, entry), ZS_MM_RO);
> if (size == PAGE_SIZE) {
> copy_page(mem, cmem);
> } else {
> @@ -722,7 +783,7 @@ static int zram_decompress_page(struct zram *zram, char *mem, u32 index)
> ret = zcomp_decompress(zstrm, cmem, size, mem);
> zcomp_stream_put(zram->comp);
> }
> - zs_unmap_object(meta->mem_pool, entry->handle);
> + zs_unmap_object(meta->mem_pool, zram_entry_handle(zram, entry));
> bit_spin_unlock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
>
> /* Should NEVER happen. Return bio error if it does. */
> @@ -840,7 +901,7 @@ static int zram_bvec_write(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec, u32 index,
> goto out;
> }
>
> - checksum = zram_calc_checksum(uncmem);
> + checksum = zram_calc_checksum(zram, uncmem);
> if (!entry) {
> entry = zram_entry_get(zram, uncmem, checksum);
> if (entry) {
> @@ -915,7 +976,8 @@ static int zram_bvec_write(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec, u32 index,
> goto out;
> }
>
> - cmem = zs_map_object(meta->mem_pool, entry->handle, ZS_MM_WO);
> + cmem = zs_map_object(meta->mem_pool,
> + zram_entry_handle(zram, entry), ZS_MM_WO);
>
> if ((clen == PAGE_SIZE) && !is_partial_io(bvec)) {
> src = kmap_atomic(page);
> @@ -927,7 +989,7 @@ static int zram_bvec_write(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec, u32 index,
>
> zcomp_stream_put(zram->comp);
> zstrm = NULL;
> - zs_unmap_object(meta->mem_pool, entry->handle);
> + zs_unmap_object(meta->mem_pool, zram_entry_handle(zram, entry));
> zram_entry_insert(zram, entry, checksum);
>
> found_duplication:
> @@ -1310,6 +1372,7 @@ static int zram_open(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode)
> static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(mem_used_max);
> static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(max_comp_streams);
> static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(comp_algorithm);
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(use_dedup);
>
> static struct attribute *zram_disk_attrs[] = {
> &dev_attr_disksize.attr,
> @@ -1320,6 +1383,7 @@ static int zram_open(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode)
> &dev_attr_mem_used_max.attr,
> &dev_attr_max_comp_streams.attr,
> &dev_attr_comp_algorithm.attr,
> + &dev_attr_use_dedup.attr,
> &dev_attr_io_stat.attr,
> &dev_attr_mm_stat.attr,
> &dev_attr_debug_stat.attr,
> diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h
> index 07d1f8d..b823555 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h
> @@ -141,5 +141,6 @@ struct zram {
> * zram is claimed so open request will be failed
> */
> bool claim; /* Protected by bdev->bd_mutex */
> + int use_dedup;
For binary result, I want to use 'bool'
> };
> #endif
> --
> 1.9.1
>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-23 04:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <to1ip-4sJ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1606108 |
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 09:00:59AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 11:46:38AM +0900, js1304@gmail.com wrote:
> > From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
> >
> > Benefit of deduplication is dependent on the workload so it's not
> > preferable to always enable. Therefore, make it optional.
>
> Please make it to Kconfig, too. And write down the description to impress
> "help a lot for users who uses zram to build output directory"
> And the feature should be disabled as default.
Okay.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> > index 012425f..e45aa9f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> > @@ -328,6 +328,39 @@ static ssize_t comp_algorithm_store(struct device *dev,
> > return len;
> > }
> >
> > +static ssize_t use_dedup_show(struct device *dev,
> > + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> > +{
> > + int val;
> > + struct zram *zram = dev_to_zram(dev);
> > +
> > + down_read(&zram->init_lock);
> > + val = zram->use_dedup;
> > + up_read(&zram->init_lock);
> > +
> > + return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%d\n", val);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static ssize_t use_dedup_store(struct device *dev,
> > + struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t len)
> > +{
> > + int val;
> > + struct zram *zram = dev_to_zram(dev);
> > +
> > + if (kstrtoint(buf, 10, &val) || (val != 0 && val != 1))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + down_write(&zram->init_lock);
> > + if (init_done(zram)) {
> > + up_write(&zram->init_lock);
> > + pr_info("Can't change dedup usage for initialized device\n");
> > + return -EBUSY;
> > + }
> > + zram->use_dedup = val;
> > + up_write(&zram->init_lock);
> > + return len;
> > +}
> > +
> > static ssize_t compact_store(struct device *dev,
> > struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t len)
> > {
> > @@ -422,11 +455,23 @@ static ssize_t debug_stat_show(struct device *dev,
> > static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(mm_stat);
> > static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(debug_stat);
> >
> > -static u32 zram_calc_checksum(unsigned char *mem)
> > +static u32 zram_calc_checksum(struct zram *zram, unsigned char *mem)
> > {
> > + if (!zram->use_dedup)
> > + return 0;
> > +
>
> Hmm, I don't like this style which every dedup functions have the check
> "use_dedup".
>
> Can't we abstract like this?
I will try but I'm not sure it can be.
>
> I want to find more simple way to no need to add the check when new dedup
> functions pop up.
>
> bool zram_dedup_check
> if (!zram->dedup)
> return false;
>
> zram_dedup_checksum
> entry = zram_dedup_get
> if (!entry) {
> zram_dedup_add
> return false;
> }
> ..
> return true;
>
>
> zram_bvec_write:
> ...
> ...
>
> if (zram_dedup_match())
> goto found_dup;
>
>
>
> > return jhash(mem, PAGE_SIZE, 0);
> > }
> >
> > +static unsigned long zram_entry_handle(struct zram *zram,
> > + struct zram_entry *entry)
> > +{
> > + if (!zram->use_dedup)
> > + return (unsigned long)entry;
> > +
> > + return entry->handle;
> > +}
> > +
> > static struct zram_entry *zram_entry_alloc(struct zram *zram,
> > unsigned int len, gfp_t flags)
> > {
> > @@ -438,6 +483,9 @@ static struct zram_entry *zram_entry_alloc(struct zram *zram,
> > if (!handle)
> > return NULL;
> >
> > + if (!zram->use_dedup)
> > + return (struct zram_entry *)handle;
> > +
> > entry = kzalloc(sizeof(*entry), flags);
> > if (!entry) {
> > zs_free(meta->mem_pool, handle);
> > @@ -462,6 +510,9 @@ static void zram_entry_insert(struct zram *zram, struct zram_entry *new,
> > struct rb_node **rb_node, *parent = NULL;
> > struct zram_entry *entry;
> >
> > + if (!zram->use_dedup)
> > + return;
> > +
> > new->checksum = checksum;
> > hash = &meta->hash[checksum % meta->hash_size];
> > rb_root = &hash->rb_root;
> > @@ -492,7 +543,8 @@ static bool zram_entry_match(struct zram *zram, struct zram_entry *entry,
> > struct zram_meta *meta = zram->meta;
> > struct zcomp_strm *zstrm;
> >
> > - cmem = zs_map_object(meta->mem_pool, entry->handle, ZS_MM_RO);
> > + cmem = zs_map_object(meta->mem_pool,
> > + zram_entry_handle(zram, entry), ZS_MM_RO);
> > if (entry->len == PAGE_SIZE) {
> > match = !memcmp(mem, cmem, PAGE_SIZE);
> > } else {
> > @@ -501,7 +553,7 @@ static bool zram_entry_match(struct zram *zram, struct zram_entry *entry,
> > match = !memcmp(mem, zstrm->buffer, PAGE_SIZE);
> > zcomp_stream_put(zram->comp);
> > }
> > - zs_unmap_object(meta->mem_pool, entry->handle);
> > + zs_unmap_object(meta->mem_pool, zram_entry_handle(zram, entry));
> >
> > return match;
> > }
> > @@ -521,6 +573,11 @@ static bool zram_entry_put(struct zram *zram, struct zram_meta *meta,
> > struct zram_hash *hash;
> > u32 checksum;
> >
> > + if (!zram->use_dedup) {
> > + zs_free(meta->mem_pool, zram_entry_handle(zram, entry));
> > + return false;
> > + }
> > +
> > if (!populated)
> > goto free;
> >
> > @@ -551,6 +608,9 @@ static struct zram_entry *zram_entry_get(struct zram *zram,
> > struct zram_entry *entry;
> > struct rb_node *rb_node;
> >
> > + if (!zram->use_dedup)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > hash = &meta->hash[checksum % meta->hash_size];
> >
> > spin_lock(&hash->lock);
> > @@ -713,7 +773,8 @@ static int zram_decompress_page(struct zram *zram, char *mem, u32 index)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > - cmem = zs_map_object(meta->mem_pool, entry->handle, ZS_MM_RO);
> > + cmem = zs_map_object(meta->mem_pool,
> > + zram_entry_handle(zram, entry), ZS_MM_RO);
> > if (size == PAGE_SIZE) {
> > copy_page(mem, cmem);
> > } else {
> > @@ -722,7 +783,7 @@ static int zram_decompress_page(struct zram *zram, char *mem, u32 index)
> > ret = zcomp_decompress(zstrm, cmem, size, mem);
> > zcomp_stream_put(zram->comp);
> > }
> > - zs_unmap_object(meta->mem_pool, entry->handle);
> > + zs_unmap_object(meta->mem_pool, zram_entry_handle(zram, entry));
> > bit_spin_unlock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
> >
> > /* Should NEVER happen. Return bio error if it does. */
> > @@ -840,7 +901,7 @@ static int zram_bvec_write(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec, u32 index,
> > goto out;
> > }
> >
> > - checksum = zram_calc_checksum(uncmem);
> > + checksum = zram_calc_checksum(zram, uncmem);
> > if (!entry) {
> > entry = zram_entry_get(zram, uncmem, checksum);
> > if (entry) {
> > @@ -915,7 +976,8 @@ static int zram_bvec_write(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec, u32 index,
> > goto out;
> > }
> >
> > - cmem = zs_map_object(meta->mem_pool, entry->handle, ZS_MM_WO);
> > + cmem = zs_map_object(meta->mem_pool,
> > + zram_entry_handle(zram, entry), ZS_MM_WO);
> >
> > if ((clen == PAGE_SIZE) && !is_partial_io(bvec)) {
> > src = kmap_atomic(page);
> > @@ -927,7 +989,7 @@ static int zram_bvec_write(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec, u32 index,
> >
> > zcomp_stream_put(zram->comp);
> > zstrm = NULL;
> > - zs_unmap_object(meta->mem_pool, entry->handle);
> > + zs_unmap_object(meta->mem_pool, zram_entry_handle(zram, entry));
> > zram_entry_insert(zram, entry, checksum);
> >
> > found_duplication:
> > @@ -1310,6 +1372,7 @@ static int zram_open(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode)
> > static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(mem_used_max);
> > static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(max_comp_streams);
> > static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(comp_algorithm);
> > +static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(use_dedup);
> >
> > static struct attribute *zram_disk_attrs[] = {
> > &dev_attr_disksize.attr,
> > @@ -1320,6 +1383,7 @@ static int zram_open(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode)
> > &dev_attr_mem_used_max.attr,
> > &dev_attr_max_comp_streams.attr,
> > &dev_attr_comp_algorithm.attr,
> > + &dev_attr_use_dedup.attr,
> > &dev_attr_io_stat.attr,
> > &dev_attr_mm_stat.attr,
> > &dev_attr_debug_stat.attr,
> > diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h
> > index 07d1f8d..b823555 100644
> > --- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h
> > +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h
> > @@ -141,5 +141,6 @@ struct zram {
> > * zram is claimed so open request will be failed
> > */
> > bool claim; /* Protected by bdev->bd_mutex */
> > + int use_dedup;
>
> For binary result, I want to use 'bool'
Okay.
Thanks.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-27 10:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tpy2C-51D-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1607146 |
On (03/23/17 12:05), Joonsoo Kim wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 09:00:59AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 11:46:38AM +0900, js1304@gmail.com wrote: > > > From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> > > > > > > Benefit of deduplication is dependent on the workload so it's not > > > preferable to always enable. Therefore, make it optional. > > > > Please make it to Kconfig, too. And write down the description to impress > > "help a lot for users who uses zram to build output directory" > > And the feature should be disabled as default. > > Okay. so I was thinking for a moment -- do we want to keep this functionality in zram or may be it belongs to allocator (zsmalloc)? what do you think? just a question. -ss
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web