Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1605223 > unrolled thread

linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with the drm-intel-fixes tree

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

Contents

  linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with the  drm-intel-fixes tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-03-21 01:40 +0100

#1605223 — linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with the drm-intel-fixes tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm-intel tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c

between commit:

  3cd23b828b37 ("drm/i915/gvt: GVT pin/unpin shadow context")

from the drm-intel-fixes tree and commit:

  e642c85b03de ("drm/i915: Remove superfluous i915_add_request_no_flush() helper")

from the drm-intel tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c
index 39a83eb7aecc,31d2240fdb1f..000000000000
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c
@@@ -246,10 -212,7 +244,10 @@@ out
  		workload->status = ret;
  
  	if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rq))
- 		i915_add_request_no_flush(rq);
+ 		i915_add_request(rq);
 +	else
 +		engine->context_unpin(engine, shadow_ctx);
 +
  	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->drm.struct_mutex);
  	return ret;
  }

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web