Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1605147 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: stm32-dma: Add property to handle STM32 DMAMUX

Started byRob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
First post2017-03-20 22:50 +0100
Last post2017-03-20 22:50 +0100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: stm32-dma: Add property to handle STM32  DMAMUX Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2017-03-20 22:50 +0100

#1605147 — Re: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: stm32-dma: Add property to handle STM32 DMAMUX

FromRob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Date2017-03-20 22:50 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: stm32-dma: Add property to handle STM32 DMAMUX
Message-ID<tndlD-2eT-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 03:15:59PM +0100, M'boumba Cedric Madianga wrote:
> This patch adds an optional property needed for STM32 DMA controller
> addressed via STM32 DMAMUX.
> 
> Signed-off-by: M'boumba Cedric Madianga <cedric.madianga@gmail.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/stm32-dma.txt | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/stm32-dma.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/stm32-dma.txt
> index 4408af6..7b5e91a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/stm32-dma.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/stm32-dma.txt
> @@ -16,6 +16,9 @@ Optional properties:
>  - resets: Reference to a reset controller asserting the DMA controller
>  - st,mem2mem: boolean; if defined, it indicates that the controller supports
>    memory-to-memory transfer
> +- st,dmamux: boolean; if defined, it indicates that the controller is behind a
> +  DMA multiplexer. In that case, using dma instances doesn't work for DMA
> +  clients. They have to use dma-router instances.

This should not be needed for the same reason we don't need anything 
like this for chained interrupt controllers.

Also, the compatible string should be specific enough to provide this 
information.

Rob

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web