Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1604256 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH] gcc-plugins: update architecture list in documentation

Started byMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
First post2017-03-20 10:00 +0100
Last post2017-03-21 08:10 +0100
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH] gcc-plugins: update architecture list in documentation Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> - 2017-03-20 10:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] gcc-plugins: update architecture list in documentation Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-03-20 18:10 +0100
      Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH] gcc-plugins: update architecture list in documentation Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> - 2017-03-21 08:10 +0100

#1604256 — Re: [PATCH] gcc-plugins: update architecture list in documentation

FromMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Date2017-03-20 10:00 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH] gcc-plugins: update architecture list in documentation
Message-ID<tn1ku-2eN-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com> writes:

> Commit 65c059bcaa73 ("powerpc: Enable support for GCC plugins") enabled GCC
> plugins on powerpc, but neglected to update the architecture list in the
> docs. Rectify this.
>
> Fixes: 65c059bcaa73 ("powerpc: Enable support for GCC plugins")
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/gcc-plugins.txt | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

It would be nice to merge this for v4.11, so the docs are up to do date
with the code for the release.

I'm not sure who owns it though, should it go via Jon as docs
maintainer (added to CC), or via Kees tree or mine?

cheers


>
> diff --git a/Documentation/gcc-plugins.txt b/Documentation/gcc-plugins.txt
> index 891c69464434..433eaefb4aa1 100644
> --- a/Documentation/gcc-plugins.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/gcc-plugins.txt
> @@ -18,8 +18,8 @@ because gcc versions 4.5 and 4.6 are compiled by a C compiler,
>  gcc-4.7 can be compiled by a C or a C++ compiler,
>  and versions 4.8+ can only be compiled by a C++ compiler.
>  
> -Currently the GCC plugin infrastructure supports only the x86, arm and arm64
> -architectures.
> +Currently the GCC plugin infrastructure supports only the x86, arm, arm64 and
> +powerpc architectures.
>  
>  This infrastructure was ported from grsecurity [6] and PaX [7].
>  
> -- 
> Andrew Donnellan              OzLabs, ADL Canberra
> andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com  IBM Australia Limited

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1604812

FromKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Date2017-03-20 18:10 +0100
Message-ID<tn8YG-7Pz-39@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1604256
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 1:39 AM, Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
> Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com> writes:
>
>> Commit 65c059bcaa73 ("powerpc: Enable support for GCC plugins") enabled GCC
>> plugins on powerpc, but neglected to update the architecture list in the
>> docs. Rectify this.
>>
>> Fixes: 65c059bcaa73 ("powerpc: Enable support for GCC plugins")
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/gcc-plugins.txt | 4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> It would be nice to merge this for v4.11, so the docs are up to do date
> with the code for the release.
>
> I'm not sure who owns it though, should it go via Jon as docs
> maintainer (added to CC), or via Kees tree or mine?

If you have other changes queued for v4.11, please take it via your
tree. Otherwise, perhaps the docs tree or mine? (I don't currently
have any fixes queued; I'm just trying to minimize pull requests going
to Linus...)

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1605354 — Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH] gcc-plugins: update architecture list in documentation

FromMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Date2017-03-21 08:10 +0100
SubjectRe: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH] gcc-plugins: update architecture list in documentation
Message-ID<tnm5z-8oE-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1604812
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> writes:

> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 1:39 AM, Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
>> Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com> writes:
>>
>>> Commit 65c059bcaa73 ("powerpc: Enable support for GCC plugins") enabled GCC
>>> plugins on powerpc, but neglected to update the architecture list in the
>>> docs. Rectify this.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 65c059bcaa73 ("powerpc: Enable support for GCC plugins")
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com>
>>> ---
>>>  Documentation/gcc-plugins.txt | 4 ++--
>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> It would be nice to merge this for v4.11, so the docs are up to do date
>> with the code for the release.
>>
>> I'm not sure who owns it though, should it go via Jon as docs
>> maintainer (added to CC), or via Kees tree or mine?
>
> If you have other changes queued for v4.11, please take it via your
> tree. Otherwise, perhaps the docs tree or mine? (I don't currently
> have any fixes queued; I'm just trying to minimize pull requests going
> to Linus...)

I have some fixes queued already, so unless Jon yells I'll take it in
the next day or so.

cheers

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web