Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1603786 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 1/6] arm64: Use full path in KBUILD_IMAGE definition

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH 1/6] arm64: Use full path in KBUILD_IMAGE definition Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> - 2017-03-18 14:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 1/6] arm64: Use full path in KBUILD_IMAGE definition Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2017-03-20 13:20 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 1/6] arm64: Use full path in KBUILD_IMAGE definition Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> - 2017-03-20 15:00 +0100

#1603786 — Re: [PATCH 1/6] arm64: Use full path in KBUILD_IMAGE definition

Hi Will, Michal,

2017-03-11 6:20 GMT+09:00 Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com>:
> Dne 10.3.2017 v 18:58 Will Deacon napsal(a):
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:34:29PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
>>> The KBUILD_IMAGE variable is used by the rpm and deb-pkg targets, which
>>> expect it to point to the image file in the build directory. The
>>> builddeb script has a workaround for architectures which only provide
>>> the basename, but let's provide a clean interface for packaging tools.
>>>
>>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>>> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
>>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm64/Makefile | 6 +++---
>>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> What's the plan for this patch? I'm happy to merge it,
>
> Great, please merge it.
>
>
>> but I don't see
>> the rest of the series queued anywhere.
>
> I'll see what remains and submit the rest via the kbuild tree.
>
> Thanks,
> Michal
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


I like this approach, rather than fixing scripts/package/mkspec.


So, how shall we handle this series?


I am OK with getting 1/6 in through arm64 tree,
but 6/6 will be postponed in the case.



If Will issues Acked-by, I can pick-up the whole series
to linux-kbuild.




-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1604454

On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 10:14:41PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> 2017-03-11 6:20 GMT+09:00 Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com>:
> > Dne 10.3.2017 v 18:58 Will Deacon napsal(a):
> >> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:34:29PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
> >>> The KBUILD_IMAGE variable is used by the rpm and deb-pkg targets, which
> >>> expect it to point to the image file in the build directory. The
> >>> builddeb script has a workaround for architectures which only provide
> >>> the basename, but let's provide a clean interface for packaging tools.
> >>>
> >>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> >>> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> >>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> >>> Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  arch/arm64/Makefile | 6 +++---
> >>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> What's the plan for this patch? I'm happy to merge it,
> >
> > Great, please merge it.
> >
> >> but I don't see
> >> the rest of the series queued anywhere.
> >
> > I'll see what remains and submit the rest via the kbuild tree.
> >
> 
> I like this approach, rather than fixing scripts/package/mkspec.
> 
> 
> So, how shall we handle this series?
> 
> 
> I am OK with getting 1/6 in through arm64 tree,
> but 6/6 will be postponed in the case.
> 
> 
> 
> If Will issues Acked-by, I can pick-up the whole series
> to linux-kbuild.

Ok, that works for me too. For the first patch:

Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

So please take this via linux-kbuild.

Will

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1604603

2017-03-20 21:13 GMT+09:00 Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>:
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 10:14:41PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>> 2017-03-11 6:20 GMT+09:00 Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com>:
>> > Dne 10.3.2017 v 18:58 Will Deacon napsal(a):
>> >> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:34:29PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
>> >>> The KBUILD_IMAGE variable is used by the rpm and deb-pkg targets, which
>> >>> expect it to point to the image file in the build directory. The
>> >>> builddeb script has a workaround for architectures which only provide
>> >>> the basename, but let's provide a clean interface for packaging tools.
>> >>>
>> >>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>> >>> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
>> >>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>> >>> Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com>
>> >>> ---
>> >>>  arch/arm64/Makefile | 6 +++---
>> >>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >> What's the plan for this patch? I'm happy to merge it,
>> >
>> > Great, please merge it.
>> >
>> >> but I don't see
>> >> the rest of the series queued anywhere.
>> >
>> > I'll see what remains and submit the rest via the kbuild tree.
>> >
>>
>> I like this approach, rather than fixing scripts/package/mkspec.
>>
>>
>> So, how shall we handle this series?
>>
>>
>> I am OK with getting 1/6 in through arm64 tree,
>> but 6/6 will be postponed in the case.
>>
>>
>>
>> If Will issues Acked-by, I can pick-up the whole series
>> to linux-kbuild.
>
> Ok, that works for me too. For the first patch:
>
> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
>
> So please take this via linux-kbuild.
>
> Will


Applied to linux-kbuild/misc.  Thanks!




-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web