Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1603401 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 01/10] ARM: dts: N9/N950: add bluetooth

Started byPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
First post2017-03-17 16:30 +0100
Last post2017-03-18 02:00 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 01/10] ARM: dts: N9/N950: add bluetooth Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2017-03-17 16:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 01/10] ARM: dts: N9/N950: add bluetooth Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org> - 2017-03-18 02:00 +0100

#1603401 — Re: [PATCH 01/10] ARM: dts: N9/N950: add bluetooth

FromPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date2017-03-17 16:30 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 01/10] ARM: dts: N9/N950: add bluetooth
Message-ID<tm1Zg-8sC-19@gated-at.bofh.it>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hi!

> The Nokia N950 and N9 have a wl1271 (with nokia bootloader) bluetooth
> module connected to second UART.

I don't get it. We are describing hardware, what does it have to do
with bootloader? Is there something not described here, because it is
already initialized by bootloader?

									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1603685

FromSebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>
Date2017-03-18 02:00 +0100
Message-ID<tmaSR-6Db-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1603401

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hi,

On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 04:25:29PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > The Nokia N950 and N9 have a wl1271 (with nokia bootloader) bluetooth
> > module connected to second UART.
> 
> I don't get it. We are describing hardware, what does it have to do
> with bootloader? Is there something not described here, because it is
> already initialized by bootloader?

This is about the wl1271 "bootloader"/low-level interface. The same
chip exists with a TI low-level interface, which requires a
different driver/firmware.

-- Sebastian

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web