Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1604061 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] staging: impedance-analyzer: ad5933: Remove unnecessary goto

Started bysimran singhal <singhalsimran0@gmail.com>
First post2017-03-19 19:00 +0100
Last post2017-03-19 19:30 +0100
Articles 3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH] staging: impedance-analyzer: ad5933: Remove unnecessary goto simran singhal <singhalsimran0@gmail.com> - 2017-03-19 19:00 +0100
    Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH] staging: impedance-analyzer: ad5933:  Remove unnecessary goto Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2017-03-19 19:10 +0100
      Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH] staging: impedance-analyzer: ad5933:  Remove unnecessary goto SIMRAN SINGHAL <singhalsimran0@gmail.com> - 2017-03-19 19:30 +0100

#1604061 — [PATCH] staging: impedance-analyzer: ad5933: Remove unnecessary goto

Fromsimran singhal <singhalsimran0@gmail.com>
Date2017-03-19 19:00 +0100
Subject[PATCH] staging: impedance-analyzer: ad5933: Remove unnecessary goto
Message-ID<tmNhw-Gx-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Remove unnecessary goto.

Signed-off-by: simran singhal <singhalsimran0@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c | 10 ++++------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c b/drivers/staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c
index 297665d..c9ed2ac 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c
@@ -663,12 +663,12 @@ static void ad5933_work(struct work_struct *work)
 		ad5933_cmd(st, AD5933_CTRL_START_SWEEP);
 		st->state = AD5933_CTRL_START_SWEEP;
 		schedule_delayed_work(&st->work, st->poll_time_jiffies);
-		goto out;
+		mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
 	}
 
 	ret = ad5933_i2c_read(st->client, AD5933_REG_STATUS, 1, &status);
 	if (ret)
-		goto out;
+		mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
 
 	if (status & AD5933_STAT_DATA_VALID) {
 		int scan_count = bitmap_weight(indio_dev->active_scan_mask,
@@ -678,7 +678,7 @@ static void ad5933_work(struct work_struct *work)
 				AD5933_REG_REAL_DATA : AD5933_REG_IMAG_DATA,
 				scan_count * 2, (u8 *)buf);
 		if (ret)
-			goto out;
+			mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
 
 		if (scan_count == 2) {
 			val[0] = be16_to_cpu(buf[0]);
@@ -690,7 +690,7 @@ static void ad5933_work(struct work_struct *work)
 	} else {
 		/* no data available - try again later */
 		schedule_delayed_work(&st->work, st->poll_time_jiffies);
-		goto out;
+		mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
 	}
 
 	if (status & AD5933_STAT_SWEEP_DONE) {
@@ -703,8 +703,6 @@ static void ad5933_work(struct work_struct *work)
 		ad5933_cmd(st, AD5933_CTRL_INC_FREQ);
 		schedule_delayed_work(&st->work, st->poll_time_jiffies);
 	}
-out:
-	mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
 }
 
 static int ad5933_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
-- 
2.7.4

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1604062 — Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH] staging: impedance-analyzer: ad5933: Remove unnecessary goto

FromJulia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Date2017-03-19 19:10 +0100
SubjectRe: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH] staging: impedance-analyzer: ad5933: Remove unnecessary goto
Message-ID<tmNrb-108-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1604061

On Sun, 19 Mar 2017, simran singhal wrote:

> Remove unnecessary goto.
>
> Signed-off-by: simran singhal <singhalsimran0@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c | 10 ++++------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c b/drivers/staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c
> index 297665d..c9ed2ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c
> @@ -663,12 +663,12 @@ static void ad5933_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  		ad5933_cmd(st, AD5933_CTRL_START_SWEEP);
>  		st->state = AD5933_CTRL_START_SWEEP;
>  		schedule_delayed_work(&st->work, st->poll_time_jiffies);
> -		goto out;
> +		mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);

This is not correct.  The code at the end of the function implicitly does
a return, which has disappeared in the change.  You could add a return to
each place wher you have put a mutex_unlock, but I think that the code was
better off as it was.  It's microscopically less error prone to have this
cleanup code in only one place.

julia

>  	}
>
>  	ret = ad5933_i2c_read(st->client, AD5933_REG_STATUS, 1, &status);
>  	if (ret)
> -		goto out;
> +		mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
>
>  	if (status & AD5933_STAT_DATA_VALID) {
>  		int scan_count = bitmap_weight(indio_dev->active_scan_mask,
> @@ -678,7 +678,7 @@ static void ad5933_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  				AD5933_REG_REAL_DATA : AD5933_REG_IMAG_DATA,
>  				scan_count * 2, (u8 *)buf);
>  		if (ret)
> -			goto out;
> +			mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
>
>  		if (scan_count == 2) {
>  			val[0] = be16_to_cpu(buf[0]);
> @@ -690,7 +690,7 @@ static void ad5933_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  	} else {
>  		/* no data available - try again later */
>  		schedule_delayed_work(&st->work, st->poll_time_jiffies);
> -		goto out;
> +		mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
>  	}
>
>  	if (status & AD5933_STAT_SWEEP_DONE) {
> @@ -703,8 +703,6 @@ static void ad5933_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  		ad5933_cmd(st, AD5933_CTRL_INC_FREQ);
>  		schedule_delayed_work(&st->work, st->poll_time_jiffies);
>  	}
> -out:
> -	mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
>  }
>
>  static int ad5933_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> --
> 2.7.4
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "outreachy-kernel" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to outreachy-kernel+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/outreachy-kernel/20170319175133.GA19710%40singhal-Inspiron-5558.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1604068 — Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH] staging: impedance-analyzer: ad5933: Remove unnecessary goto

FromSIMRAN SINGHAL <singhalsimran0@gmail.com>
Date2017-03-19 19:30 +0100
SubjectRe: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH] staging: impedance-analyzer: ad5933: Remove unnecessary goto
Message-ID<tmNKx-19Q-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1604062
On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 11:26 PM, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 19 Mar 2017, simran singhal wrote:
>
>> Remove unnecessary goto.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: simran singhal <singhalsimran0@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c | 10 ++++------
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c b/drivers/staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c
>> index 297665d..c9ed2ac 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c
>> @@ -663,12 +663,12 @@ static void ad5933_work(struct work_struct *work)
>>               ad5933_cmd(st, AD5933_CTRL_START_SWEEP);
>>               st->state = AD5933_CTRL_START_SWEEP;
>>               schedule_delayed_work(&st->work, st->poll_time_jiffies);
>> -             goto out;
>> +             mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
>
> This is not correct.  The code at the end of the function implicitly does
> a return, which has disappeared in the change.  You could add a return to
> each place wher you have put a mutex_unlock, but I think that the code was
> better off as it was.  It's microscopically less error prone to have this
> cleanup code in only one place.
>
OOPS!! This is totally wrong.
Sorry for this.

> julia
>
>>       }
>>
>>       ret = ad5933_i2c_read(st->client, AD5933_REG_STATUS, 1, &status);
>>       if (ret)
>> -             goto out;
>> +             mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
>>
>>       if (status & AD5933_STAT_DATA_VALID) {
>>               int scan_count = bitmap_weight(indio_dev->active_scan_mask,
>> @@ -678,7 +678,7 @@ static void ad5933_work(struct work_struct *work)
>>                               AD5933_REG_REAL_DATA : AD5933_REG_IMAG_DATA,
>>                               scan_count * 2, (u8 *)buf);
>>               if (ret)
>> -                     goto out;
>> +                     mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
>>
>>               if (scan_count == 2) {
>>                       val[0] = be16_to_cpu(buf[0]);
>> @@ -690,7 +690,7 @@ static void ad5933_work(struct work_struct *work)
>>       } else {
>>               /* no data available - try again later */
>>               schedule_delayed_work(&st->work, st->poll_time_jiffies);
>> -             goto out;
>> +             mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
>>       }
>>
>>       if (status & AD5933_STAT_SWEEP_DONE) {
>> @@ -703,8 +703,6 @@ static void ad5933_work(struct work_struct *work)
>>               ad5933_cmd(st, AD5933_CTRL_INC_FREQ);
>>               schedule_delayed_work(&st->work, st->poll_time_jiffies);
>>       }
>> -out:
>> -     mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
>>  }
>>
>>  static int ad5933_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "outreachy-kernel" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to outreachy-kernel+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
>> To post to this group, send email to outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/outreachy-kernel/20170319175133.GA19710%40singhal-Inspiron-5558.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web