Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1601609 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] pinctrl: rockchip: convert to raw spinlock

Started byJulia Cartwright <julia@ni.com>
First post2017-03-15 19:10 +0100
Last post2017-03-15 19:10 +0100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] pinctrl: rockchip: convert to raw spinlock Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com> - 2017-03-15 19:10 +0100

#1601609 — Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] pinctrl: rockchip: convert to raw spinlock

FromJulia Cartwright <julia@ni.com>
Date2017-03-15 19:10 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 2/4] pinctrl: rockchip: convert to raw spinlock
Message-ID<tllx0-2TA-9@gated-at.bofh.it>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hello John-

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 05:46:52PM +0000, John Keeping wrote:
> This lock is used from rockchip_irq_set_type() which is part of the
> irq_chip implementation and thus must use raw_spinlock_t as documented
> in Documentation/gpio/driver.txt.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@metanate.com>
> Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> ---
> v2: unchanged
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c
> index 128c383ea7ba..8c1cae6d78d7 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c
> @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ struct rockchip_pin_bank {
>  	struct irq_domain		*domain;
>  	struct gpio_chip		gpio_chip;
>  	struct pinctrl_gpio_range	grange;
> -	spinlock_t			slock;
> +	raw_spinlock_t			slock;
>  	u32				toggle_edge_mode;
>  };
>  
> @@ -1295,14 +1295,14 @@ static int rockchip_set_pull(struct rockchip_pin_bank *bank,
>  
>  	switch (ctrl->type) {
>  	case RK2928:
> -		spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->slock, flags);
> +		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->slock, flags);
>  
>  		data = BIT(bit + 16);
>  		if (pull == PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE)
>  			data |= BIT(bit);

This should be lifted out from under the lock.

>  		ret = regmap_write(regmap, reg, data);

How is this legal?  The regmap_write() here is going to end up acquiring
the regmap mutex.

   Julia

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web