Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1601627 > unrolled thread

Re: How to handle quirky behavior with boards.

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: How to handle quirky behavior with boards. Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2017-03-15 19:30 +0100

#1601627 — Re: How to handle quirky behavior with boards.

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 04:31:43PM +0100, Olliver Schinagl wrote:

> So my question is, what is there against moving some of the constrants
> before the always-on, so that the enable can atleast function properly
> according to its parameters?

No, and in general please don't ask to send patches - just send patches
with any explanation/discussion in the cover letter and/or commit log.
That tends to make things go faster as the code can make any issues more
obvious and if there's no problem then patches can just be applied
immediately.

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web