Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1601513 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v3] i2c-tools: add new tool 'i2ctransfer'

Started byWolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
First post2017-03-15 17:10 +0100
Last post2017-03-15 17:10 +0100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH v3] i2c-tools: add new tool 'i2ctransfer' Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2017-03-15 17:10 +0100

#1601513 — Re: [PATCH v3] i2c-tools: add new tool 'i2ctransfer'

FromWolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Date2017-03-15 17:10 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3] i2c-tools: add new tool 'i2ctransfer'
Message-ID<tljES-1xz-17@gated-at.bofh.it>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 12:41:35PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> 
> This tool allows to construct and concat multiple I2C messages into one
> single transfer. Its aim is to test I2C master controllers, and so there
> is no SMBus fallback.
> 
> I've been missing such a tool a number of times now, so I finally got
> around to writing it myself. As with all I2C tools, it can be dangerous,
> but it can also be very useful when developing.
> 
> It has been tested with various Renesas I2C IP cores as well as Tegra,
> i.MX and AT91.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
> Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar>
> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>

I think we can do further changes incrementally now. So, I fixed two
more typos and an ugly linebreak and committed this tool to i2c-tools
master branch. This should increase the visibility of the tool and
encourage further testing. I'd still appreciate a review by Jean, yet I
think it has a bit more time until the next release of the tools.
Although, unsurprisingly, I'd like to see this happen more soonish as
well ;)

Thanks for all the encouragement,

   Wolfram

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web