Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1600537 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] dt-bindings: gpio: Add binding documentation for gpio-thunderx

Started byLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
First post2017-03-14 16:00 +0100
Last post2017-03-14 22:30 +0100
Articles 2 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] dt-bindings: gpio: Add binding documentation for gpio-thunderx Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2017-03-14 16:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] dt-bindings: gpio: Add binding documentation for gpio-thunderx Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2017-03-14 22:30 +0100

#1600537 — Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] dt-bindings: gpio: Add binding documentation for gpio-thunderx

FromLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date2017-03-14 16:00 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 4/6] dt-bindings: gpio: Add binding documentation for gpio-thunderx
Message-ID<tkW5A-1Ad-41@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 2:48 AM, David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> wrote:

> Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

This patch applied to the GPIO tree, really simplistic so why not
merge it.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1600912

FromLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date2017-03-14 22:30 +0100
Message-ID<tl2aZ-66f-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1600537
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 5:45 PM, David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> wrote:
> On 03/14/2017 07:53 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 2:48 AM, David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
>>> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
>>
>>
>> This patch applied to the GPIO tree, really simplistic so why not
>> merge it.
>
>
> I think the idea is that with Rob's Acked-by, it could be merged via the
> GPIO tree when and if the other patches in the set are merged.  Since I
> don't maintain any trees pulled by Linus Torvalds, I am at the mercy of the
> various maintainers.

I agree that the code changes need to go in together.

But DT bindings are sort of decoupled from the kernel i general
(they are theoretically also used by other OSes such as *BSD)
so they can be merged in an orthogonal manner once they are
considered finished.

No biggie for me though, if you prefer, I can pull it out.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web