Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1600537 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-03-14 16:00 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-03-14 22:30 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] dt-bindings: gpio: Add binding documentation for gpio-thunderx Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2017-03-14 16:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] dt-bindings: gpio: Add binding documentation for gpio-thunderx Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2017-03-14 22:30 +0100
| From | Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-14 16:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] dt-bindings: gpio: Add binding documentation for gpio-thunderx |
| Message-ID | <tkW5A-1Ad-41@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 2:48 AM, David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> wrote: > Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> This patch applied to the GPIO tree, really simplistic so why not merge it. Yours, Linus Walleij
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-14 22:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tl2aZ-66f-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1600537 |
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 5:45 PM, David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> wrote: > On 03/14/2017 07:53 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: >> >> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 2:48 AM, David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> >>> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> >> >> >> This patch applied to the GPIO tree, really simplistic so why not >> merge it. > > > I think the idea is that with Rob's Acked-by, it could be merged via the > GPIO tree when and if the other patches in the set are merged. Since I > don't maintain any trees pulled by Linus Torvalds, I am at the mercy of the > various maintainers. I agree that the code changes need to go in together. But DT bindings are sort of decoupled from the kernel i general (they are theoretically also used by other OSes such as *BSD) so they can be merged in an orthogonal manner once they are considered finished. No biggie for me though, if you prefer, I can pull it out. Yours, Linus Walleij
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web