Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1599189 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel.opensrc@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-03-13 11:50 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-03-13 11:50 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [RFC v3 1/5] sched/core: add capacity constraints to CPU controller "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel.opensrc@gmail.com> - 2017-03-13 11:50 +0100
| From | "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel.opensrc@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-13 11:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [RFC v3 1/5] sched/core: add capacity constraints to CPU controller |
| Message-ID | <tkvI5-7IV-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 6:38 AM, Patrick Bellasi
<patrick.bellasi@arm.com> wrote:
> The CPU CGroup controller allows to assign a specified (maximum)
> bandwidth to tasks within a group, however it does not enforce any
> constraint on how such bandwidth can be consumed.
> With the integration of schedutil, the scheduler has now the proper
> information about a task to select the most suitable frequency to
> satisfy tasks needs.
[..]
> +static u64 cpu_capacity_min_read_u64(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css,
> + struct cftype *cft)
> +{
> + struct task_group *tg;
> + u64 min_capacity;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + tg = css_tg(css);
> + min_capacity = tg->cap_clamp[CAP_CLAMP_MIN];
Shouldn't the cap_clamp be accessed with READ_ONCE (and WRITE_ONCE in
the write path) to avoid load-tearing?
Thanks,
Joel
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web