Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1598030 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] staging: speakup: Comparison to NULL could be written

Started byArushi Singhal <arushisinghal19971997@gmail.com>
First post2017-03-10 20:00 +0100
Last post2017-03-12 15:30 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH] staging: speakup: Comparison to NULL could be written Arushi Singhal <arushisinghal19971997@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 20:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] staging: speakup: Comparison to NULL could be written Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-03-12 15:30 +0100

#1598030 — [PATCH] staging: speakup: Comparison to NULL could be written

FromArushi Singhal <arushisinghal19971997@gmail.com>
Date2017-03-10 20:00 +0100
Subject[PATCH] staging: speakup: Comparison to NULL could be written
Message-ID<tjxVD-80K-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Fixed coding style for null comparisons in speakup driver to be more
consistant with the rest of the kernel coding style.

Signed-off-by: Arushi Singhal <arushisinghal19971997@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/speakup/selection.c   | 2 +-
 drivers/staging/speakup/varhandlers.c | 6 +++---
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/speakup/selection.c b/drivers/staging/speakup/selection.c
index 3d15eec37163..08f68fc2864e 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/speakup/selection.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/speakup/selection.c
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ static struct speakup_paste_work speakup_paste_work = {
 
 int speakup_paste_selection(struct tty_struct *tty)
 {
-	if (cmpxchg(&speakup_paste_work.tty, NULL, tty) != NULL)
+	if (cmpxchg(&speakup_paste_work.tty, NULL, tty))
 		return -EBUSY;
 
 	tty_kref_get(tty);
diff --git a/drivers/staging/speakup/varhandlers.c b/drivers/staging/speakup/varhandlers.c
index cc984196020f..5910fe0b1365 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/speakup/varhandlers.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/speakup/varhandlers.c
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ void speakup_register_var(struct var_t *var)
 		}
 	}
 	p_header = var_ptrs[var->var_id];
-	if (p_header->data != NULL)
+	if (p_header->data)
 		return;
 	p_header->data = var;
 	switch (p_header->var_type) {
@@ -210,11 +210,11 @@ int spk_set_num_var(int input, struct st_var_header *var, int how)
 		return -ERANGE;
 
 	var_data->u.n.value = val;
-	if (var->var_type == VAR_TIME && p_val != NULL) {
+	if (var->var_type == VAR_TIME && p_val) {
 		*p_val = msecs_to_jiffies(val);
 		return 0;
 	}
-	if (p_val != NULL)
+	if (p_val)
 		*p_val = val;
 	if (var->var_id == PUNC_LEVEL) {
 		spk_punc_mask = spk_punc_masks[val];
-- 
2.11.0

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1598642

FromGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date2017-03-12 15:30 +0100
Message-ID<tkcFr-2Iv-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1598030
On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 12:29:09AM +0530, Arushi Singhal wrote:
> Fixed coding style for null comparisons in speakup driver to be more
> consistant with the rest of the kernel coding style.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arushi Singhal <arushisinghal19971997@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/speakup/selection.c   | 2 +-
>  drivers/staging/speakup/varhandlers.c | 6 +++---
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

I have over 25 patches from you for this driver, and I have no idea what
ones I should be applying and in what order.  So I've had to delete them
all from my queue.  Please rebase your series on the latest
staging-testing branch and resend, as a single patch series, what you
wish to have reviewed and potentially applied.

thanks,

greg k-h

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web