Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1600105 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-03-14 09:30 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-03-14 09:30 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH v6 03/15] lockdep: Change the meaning of check_prev_add()'s return value Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2017-03-14 09:30 +0100
| From | Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-14 09:30 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH v6 03/15] lockdep: Change the meaning of check_prev_add()'s return value |
| Message-ID | <tkQ09-5P9-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Firstly, return 1 instead of 2 when 'prev -> next' dependency already
exists. Since the value 2 is not referenced anywhere, just return 1
indicating success in this case.
Secondly, return 2 instead of 1 when successfully added a lock_list
entry with saving stack_trace. With that, a caller can decide whether
to avoid redundant save_trace() on the caller site.
Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
---
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index eb39474..4709110 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -1854,7 +1854,7 @@ static inline void inc_chains(void)
if (entry->class == hlock_class(next)) {
if (distance == 1)
entry->distance = 1;
- return 2;
+ return 1;
}
}
@@ -1894,9 +1894,10 @@ static inline void inc_chains(void)
print_lock_name(hlock_class(next));
printk(KERN_CONT "\n");
dump_stack();
- return graph_lock();
+ if (!graph_lock())
+ return 0;
}
- return 1;
+ return 2;
}
/*
--
1.9.1
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web