Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1599907 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: User/admin documentation update and consolidation

Started byJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
First post2017-03-14 00:00 +0100
Last post2017-03-14 00:20 +0100
Articles 2 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: User/admin documentation update and  consolidation Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> - 2017-03-14 00:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: User/admin documentation update and  consolidation Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> - 2017-03-14 00:20 +0100

#1599907 — Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: User/admin documentation update and consolidation

FromJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Date2017-03-14 00:00 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH] cpufreq: User/admin documentation update and consolidation
Message-ID<tkH6y-7El-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Thu, 09 Mar 2017 16:28:32 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:

> The user/admin documentation of cpufreq is badly outdated.  It
> conains stale and/or inaccurate information along with things
> that are not particularly useful.  Also, some of the important
> pieces are missing from it.
> 
> For this reason, add a new user/admin document for cpufreq
> containing current information to admin-guide and drop the old
> outdated .txt documents it is replacing.

Out of curiosity, how did you generate this?  Neither "git am" nor
"patch" wants to deal with it.  Can I ask for a retry?

Thanks,

jon

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1599918

FromJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Date2017-03-14 00:20 +0100
Message-ID<tkHpU-85V-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1599907
On Mon, 13 Mar 2017 23:59:57 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:

> Well, to be honest, I downloaded the previous iteration from Patchwork and
> I though it would apply, so I didn't check.  Sorry about that.
> 
> The one below applies for me with "git am" on top of 4.11-rc2.

Works for me too.  Now applied, thanks!

jon

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web