Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1598133 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 0/3] multiple checkpatch issues

Started byArushi Singhal <arushisinghal19971997@gmail.com>
First post2017-03-10 23:00 +0100
Last post2017-03-10 23:10 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH 0/3] multiple checkpatch issues Arushi Singhal <arushisinghal19971997@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 23:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 0/3] multiple checkpatch issues Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-03-10 23:10 +0100

#1598133 — [PATCH 0/3] multiple checkpatch issues

FromArushi Singhal <arushisinghal19971997@gmail.com>
Date2017-03-10 23:00 +0100
Subject[PATCH 0/3] multiple checkpatch issues
Message-ID<tjAJP-1r3-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Improve readability by fixing multiple checkpatch.pl
issues in sm750fb driver. 

Arushi Singhal (3):
  staging: sm750fb: function prototype argument should have an
    identifier name
  staging: sm750fb: fixes add blank line after
    function/struct/union/enum declarations
  staging: sm750fb: Alignment should match open parenthesis

 drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_display.h |  2 +-
 drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_mode.c    | 79 ++++++++++++++++----------------
 drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_mode.h    |  2 +-
 drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_power.h   |  2 +-
 drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.h          |  2 +-
 drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750_cursor.c   |  3 ++
 6 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)

-- 
2.11.0

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1598135

FromGreg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date2017-03-10 23:10 +0100
Message-ID<tjATv-1Jy-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1598133
On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 03:26:54AM +0530, Arushi Singhal wrote:
> Improve readability by fixing multiple checkpatch.pl
> issues in sm750fb driver. 

Note, _PLEASE_ put the subsystem/driver name in this 0/X email subject
line, like your patches have them.  It makes it easier when I sort
patches by driver/subsystem when reviewing them.  As it is, I end up
always ignoring these 0/X emails.

thanks,

greg k-h

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web