Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1594207 > unrolled thread

[PATCH v9 10/15] ACPI: platform-msi: retrieve dev id from IORT

Started byHanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
First post2017-03-07 14:00 +0100
Last post2017-03-11 10:00 +0100
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [PATCH v9 10/15] ACPI: platform-msi: retrieve dev id from IORT Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> - 2017-03-07 14:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v9 10/15] ACPI: platform-msi: retrieve dev id from IORT Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> - 2017-03-07 15:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v9 10/15] ACPI: platform-msi: retrieve dev id from IORT Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> - 2017-03-11 10:00 +0100

#1594207 — [PATCH v9 10/15] ACPI: platform-msi: retrieve dev id from IORT

FromHanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Date2017-03-07 14:00 +0100
Subject[PATCH v9 10/15] ACPI: platform-msi: retrieve dev id from IORT
Message-ID<timSC-7EZ-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>

For devices connecting to ITS, the devices need to identify themself
through a dev id; this dev id is represented in the IORT table in named
component node [1] for platform devices, so this patch adds code that
scans the IORT table to retrieve the devices' dev id.

Leveraging the iort_node_map_platform_id() IORT API, add a new function
call, iort_pmsi_get_dev_id() and use it in its_pmsi_prepare() to allow
retrieving dev id in ACPI platforms.

[1]: https://static.docs.arm.com/den0049/b/DEN0049B_IO_Remapping_Table.pdf

Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
[lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com: rewrote commit log]
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Tested-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Tested-by: Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com>
Tested-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
 drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c                     | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its-platform-msi.c |  3 ++-
 include/linux/acpi_iort.h                     |  5 +++++
 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
index 83cd59d..fb95ceb 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
@@ -468,6 +468,30 @@ u32 iort_msi_map_rid(struct device *dev, u32 req_id)
 }
 
 /**
+ * iort_pmsi_get_dev_id() - Get the device id for a device
+ * @dev: The device for which the mapping is to be done.
+ * @dev_id: The device ID found.
+ *
+ * Returns: 0 for successful find a dev id, -ENODEV on error
+ */
+int iort_pmsi_get_dev_id(struct device *dev, u32 *dev_id)
+{
+	int i;
+	struct acpi_iort_node *node;
+
+	node = iort_find_dev_node(dev);
+	if (!node)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < node->mapping_count; i++) {
+		if (iort_node_map_platform_id(node, dev_id, IORT_MSI_TYPE, i))
+			return 0;
+	}
+
+	return -ENODEV;
+}
+
+/**
  * iort_dev_find_its_id() - Find the ITS identifier for a device
  * @dev: The device.
  * @req_id: Device's requester ID
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its-platform-msi.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its-platform-msi.c
index e4ba9f4..e801fc0 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its-platform-msi.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its-platform-msi.c
@@ -57,7 +57,8 @@ static int its_pmsi_prepare(struct irq_domain *domain, struct device *dev,
 
 	msi_info = msi_get_domain_info(domain->parent);
 
-	ret = of_pmsi_get_dev_id(domain, dev, &dev_id);
+	ret = dev->of_node ? of_pmsi_get_dev_id(domain, dev, &dev_id) :
+		iort_pmsi_get_dev_id(dev, &dev_id);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
diff --git a/include/linux/acpi_iort.h b/include/linux/acpi_iort.h
index 77e0809..d074c77 100644
--- a/include/linux/acpi_iort.h
+++ b/include/linux/acpi_iort.h
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
 bool iort_node_match(u8 type);
 u32 iort_msi_map_rid(struct device *dev, u32 req_id);
 struct irq_domain *iort_get_device_domain(struct device *dev, u32 req_id);
+int iort_pmsi_get_dev_id(struct device *dev, u32 *dev_id);
 /* IOMMU interface */
 void iort_set_dma_mask(struct device *dev);
 const struct iommu_ops *iort_iommu_configure(struct device *dev);
@@ -45,6 +46,10 @@ static inline u32 iort_msi_map_rid(struct device *dev, u32 req_id)
 static inline struct irq_domain *iort_get_device_domain(struct device *dev,
 							u32 req_id)
 { return NULL; }
+
+static inline int iort_pmsi_get_dev_id(struct device *dev, u32 *dev_id)
+{ return -ENODEV; }
+
 /* IOMMU interface */
 static inline void iort_set_dma_mask(struct device *dev) { }
 static inline
-- 
1.7.12.4

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1594295

FromLorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Date2017-03-07 15:50 +0100
Message-ID<tioB3-pr-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1594207
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 08:40:05PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
> 
> For devices connecting to ITS, the devices need to identify themself
> through a dev id; this dev id is represented in the IORT table in named
> component node [1] for platform devices, so this patch adds code that
> scans the IORT table to retrieve the devices' dev id.
> 
> Leveraging the iort_node_map_platform_id() IORT API, add a new function
> call, iort_pmsi_get_dev_id() and use it in its_pmsi_prepare() to allow
> retrieving dev id in ACPI platforms.
> 
> [1]: https://static.docs.arm.com/den0049/b/DEN0049B_IO_Remapping_Table.pdf
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
> [lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com: rewrote commit log]
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
> Tested-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
> Tested-by: Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com>
> Tested-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
> Cc: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c                     | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its-platform-msi.c |  3 ++-
>  include/linux/acpi_iort.h                     |  5 +++++
>  3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> index 83cd59d..fb95ceb 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> @@ -468,6 +468,30 @@ u32 iort_msi_map_rid(struct device *dev, u32 req_id)
>  }
>  
>  /**
> + * iort_pmsi_get_dev_id() - Get the device id for a device
> + * @dev: The device for which the mapping is to be done.
> + * @dev_id: The device ID found.
> + *
> + * Returns: 0 for successful find a dev id, -ENODEV on error
> + */
> +int iort_pmsi_get_dev_id(struct device *dev, u32 *dev_id)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	struct acpi_iort_node *node;
> +
> +	node = iort_find_dev_node(dev);
> +	if (!node)
> +		return -ENODEV;

I think that when specs are updated so that we can enable SMMU MSIs we
shall have to find a way to get the acpi_iort_node for a device that is
not a named component here (ie SMMU), I reckon we can use the
fwnode_handle but I have to have a deeper look.

This does not affect the patchset in its current form, just scanning
the code to make sure we will be able to support SMMU MSIs too when
time comes.

Thanks,
Lorenzo

> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < node->mapping_count; i++) {
> +		if (iort_node_map_platform_id(node, dev_id, IORT_MSI_TYPE, i))
> +			return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	return -ENODEV;
> +}
> +
> +/**
>   * iort_dev_find_its_id() - Find the ITS identifier for a device
>   * @dev: The device.
>   * @req_id: Device's requester ID
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its-platform-msi.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its-platform-msi.c
> index e4ba9f4..e801fc0 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its-platform-msi.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its-platform-msi.c
> @@ -57,7 +57,8 @@ static int its_pmsi_prepare(struct irq_domain *domain, struct device *dev,
>  
>  	msi_info = msi_get_domain_info(domain->parent);
>  
> -	ret = of_pmsi_get_dev_id(domain, dev, &dev_id);
> +	ret = dev->of_node ? of_pmsi_get_dev_id(domain, dev, &dev_id) :
> +		iort_pmsi_get_dev_id(dev, &dev_id);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi_iort.h b/include/linux/acpi_iort.h
> index 77e0809..d074c77 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi_iort.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi_iort.h
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
>  bool iort_node_match(u8 type);
>  u32 iort_msi_map_rid(struct device *dev, u32 req_id);
>  struct irq_domain *iort_get_device_domain(struct device *dev, u32 req_id);
> +int iort_pmsi_get_dev_id(struct device *dev, u32 *dev_id);
>  /* IOMMU interface */
>  void iort_set_dma_mask(struct device *dev);
>  const struct iommu_ops *iort_iommu_configure(struct device *dev);
> @@ -45,6 +46,10 @@ static inline u32 iort_msi_map_rid(struct device *dev, u32 req_id)
>  static inline struct irq_domain *iort_get_device_domain(struct device *dev,
>  							u32 req_id)
>  { return NULL; }
> +
> +static inline int iort_pmsi_get_dev_id(struct device *dev, u32 *dev_id)
> +{ return -ENODEV; }
> +
>  /* IOMMU interface */
>  static inline void iort_set_dma_mask(struct device *dev) { }
>  static inline
> -- 
> 1.7.12.4
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1598289

FromHanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Date2017-03-11 10:00 +0100
Message-ID<tjL2x-hd-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1594295
On 2017/3/7 22:35, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 08:40:05PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
>>
>> For devices connecting to ITS, the devices need to identify themself
>> through a dev id; this dev id is represented in the IORT table in named
>> component node [1] for platform devices, so this patch adds code that
>> scans the IORT table to retrieve the devices' dev id.
>>
>> Leveraging the iort_node_map_platform_id() IORT API, add a new function
>> call, iort_pmsi_get_dev_id() and use it in its_pmsi_prepare() to allow
>> retrieving dev id in ACPI platforms.
>>
>> [1]: https://static.docs.arm.com/den0049/b/DEN0049B_IO_Remapping_Table.pdf
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
>> [lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com: rewrote commit log]
>> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
>> Tested-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
>> Tested-by: Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com>
>> Tested-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
>> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
>> Cc: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>> ---
>>  drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c                     | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its-platform-msi.c |  3 ++-
>>  include/linux/acpi_iort.h                     |  5 +++++
>>  3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
>> index 83cd59d..fb95ceb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
>> @@ -468,6 +468,30 @@ u32 iort_msi_map_rid(struct device *dev, u32 req_id)
>>  }
>>  
>>  /**
>> + * iort_pmsi_get_dev_id() - Get the device id for a device
>> + * @dev: The device for which the mapping is to be done.
>> + * @dev_id: The device ID found.
>> + *
>> + * Returns: 0 for successful find a dev id, -ENODEV on error
>> + */
>> +int iort_pmsi_get_dev_id(struct device *dev, u32 *dev_id)
>> +{
>> +	int i;
>> +	struct acpi_iort_node *node;
>> +
>> +	node = iort_find_dev_node(dev);
>> +	if (!node)
>> +		return -ENODEV;
> I think that when specs are updated so that we can enable SMMU MSIs we
> shall have to find a way to get the acpi_iort_node for a device that is
> not a named component here (ie SMMU), I reckon we can use the
> fwnode_handle but I have to have a deeper look.

Seems we can do this as follows:

---
 drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
index 22e08d2..c794219 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
@@ -121,6 +121,31 @@ static inline void iort_delete_fwnode(struct acpi_iort_node *node)
        spin_unlock(&iort_fwnode_lock);
 }
 
+/**
+ * iort_get_iort_node() - Retrieve iort_node associated with an fwnode
+ *
+ * @fwnode: fwnode associated with device to be looked-up
+ *
+ * Returns: iort_node pointer on success, NULL on failure
+ */
+static inline
+struct acpi_iort_node *iort_get_iort_node(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
+{
+ struct iort_fwnode *curr;
+ struct acpi_iort_node *iort_node = NULL;
+
+ spin_lock(&iort_fwnode_lock);
+ list_for_each_entry(curr, &iort_fwnode_list, list) {
+         if (curr->fwnode == fwnode) {
+                 iort_node = curr->iort_node;
+                 break;
+         }
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&iort_fwnode_lock);
+
+ return iort_node;
+}
+
 typedef acpi_status (*iort_find_node_callback)
        (struct acpi_iort_node *node, void *context);
 
@@ -434,9 +459,25 @@ static struct acpi_iort_node *iort_find_dev_node(struct device *dev)
 {
        struct pci_bus *pbus;
 
-   if (!dev_is_pci(dev))
+ if (!dev_is_pci(dev)) {
+         struct acpi_iort_node *node;
+         /*
+          * scan iort_fwnode_list to see if it's an iort platform
+          * device (such as SMMU, PMCG),its iort node already cached
+          * and associated with fwnode when iort platform devices
+          * were initialized.
+          */
+         node = iort_get_iort_node(dev->fwnode);
+         if (node)
+                 return node;
+
+         /*
+          * if not, then it should be a platform device defined in
+          * DSDT (with Named Component node in IORT)
+          */
                return iort_scan_node(ACPI_IORT_NODE_NAMED_COMPONENT,
                                      iort_match_node_callback, dev);
+ }
 
        /* Find a PCI root bus */
        pbus = to_pci_dev(dev)->bus;


>
> This does not affect the patchset in its current form, just scanning
> the code to make sure we will be able to support SMMU MSIs too when
> time comes.

Sure, thanks!

Hanjun

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web