Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1592591 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH] scsi: lpfc: fix missing spin_unlock on sql_list_lock

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH] scsi: lpfc: fix missing spin_unlock on sql_list_lock James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com> - 2017-03-04 18:50 +0100

#1592591 — Re: [PATCH] scsi: lpfc: fix missing spin_unlock on sql_list_lock

Looks good. I included it in the lpfc patch set just posted.

-- james


On 2/24/2017 6:30 AM, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> In the case where sglq is null, the current code just returns without
> unlocking the spinlock sql_list_lock. Fix this by breaking out of the
> while loop and the exit path will then unlock and return NULL as was
> the original intention.
>
> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1411635 ("Missing unlock")
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
>   drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
> index 1fba5dc..40720bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
> @@ -952,7 +952,7 @@ __lpfc_sli_get_els_sglq(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_iocbq *piocbq)
>   	start_sglq = sglq;
>   	while (!found) {
>   		if (!sglq)
> -			return NULL;
> +			break;
>   		if (ndlp && ndlp->active_rrqs_xri_bitmap &&
>   		    test_bit(sglq->sli4_lxritag,
>   		    ndlp->active_rrqs_xri_bitmap)) {

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web