Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1592778 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-03-05 16:20 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-03-06 02:20 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [bdi_unregister] 165a5e22fa INFO: task swapper:1 blocked for more than 120 seconds. Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> - 2017-03-05 16:20 +0100
Re: [bdi_unregister] 165a5e22fa INFO: task swapper:1 blocked for more than 120 seconds. Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> - 2017-03-06 02:20 +0100
| From | Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-05 16:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [bdi_unregister] 165a5e22fa INFO: task swapper:1 blocked for more than 120 seconds. |
| Message-ID | <thG6Z-27U-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On 03/04/2017 07:21 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote: > Hi Jan, > > FYI next-20170303 is good while mainline is bad with this error. > The attached reproduce-* may help reproduce the issue. What's the test case here? It's Sunday, we need to make a quick decision on whether to revert this patch or not. I'm inclined to do so. Jan? -- Jens Axboe
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-06 02:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [bdi_unregister] 165a5e22fa INFO: task swapper:1 blocked for more than 120 seconds. |
| Message-ID | <thPtD-oe-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1592778 |
On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 08:12:30AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: >On 03/04/2017 07:21 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote: >> Hi Jan, >> >> FYI next-20170303 is good while mainline is bad with this error. >> The attached reproduce-* may help reproduce the issue. > >What's the test case here? It's Sunday, we need to make a quick >decision on whether to revert this patch or not. I'm inclined to >do so. It's boot-and-trinity test. The initrd (that the reproduce-* script will auto download) is hard coded to do that. Thanks, Fengguang
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web