Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1592778 > unrolled thread

Re: [bdi_unregister] 165a5e22fa INFO: task swapper:1 blocked for more than 120 seconds.

Started byJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
First post2017-03-05 16:20 +0100
Last post2017-03-06 02:20 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [bdi_unregister] 165a5e22fa INFO: task swapper:1 blocked for more  than 120 seconds. Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> - 2017-03-05 16:20 +0100
    Re: [bdi_unregister] 165a5e22fa INFO: task swapper:1 blocked for  more than 120 seconds. Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> - 2017-03-06 02:20 +0100

#1592778 — Re: [bdi_unregister] 165a5e22fa INFO: task swapper:1 blocked for more than 120 seconds.

FromJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Date2017-03-05 16:20 +0100
SubjectRe: [bdi_unregister] 165a5e22fa INFO: task swapper:1 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
Message-ID<thG6Z-27U-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
On 03/04/2017 07:21 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> Hi Jan,
> 
> FYI next-20170303 is good while mainline is bad with this error.
> The attached reproduce-* may help reproduce the issue.

What's the test case here? It's Sunday, we need to make a quick
decision on whether to revert this patch or not. I'm inclined to
do so.

Jan?

-- 
Jens Axboe

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1592874 — Re: [bdi_unregister] 165a5e22fa INFO: task swapper:1 blocked for more than 120 seconds.

FromFengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Date2017-03-06 02:20 +0100
SubjectRe: [bdi_unregister] 165a5e22fa INFO: task swapper:1 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
Message-ID<thPtD-oe-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1592778
On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 08:12:30AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>On 03/04/2017 07:21 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>> Hi Jan,
>>
>> FYI next-20170303 is good while mainline is bad with this error.
>> The attached reproduce-* may help reproduce the issue.
>
>What's the test case here? It's Sunday, we need to make a quick
>decision on whether to revert this patch or not. I'm inclined to
>do so.

It's boot-and-trinity test. The initrd (that the reproduce-* script
will auto download) is hard coded to do that.

Thanks,
Fengguang

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web