Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1591182 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-03-02 16:20 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-03-03 18:20 +0100 |
| Articles | 13 — 7 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH 0/4] thp: fix few MADV_DONTNEED races "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-02 16:20 +0100
[PATCH 4/4] thp: fix MADV_DONTNEED vs clear soft dirty race "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-02 17:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 4/4] thp: fix MADV_DONTNEED vs clear soft dirty race Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-03-03 23:50 +0100
[PATCH 3/4] thp: fix MADV_DONTNEED vs. MADV_FREE race "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-02 17:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/4] thp: fix MADV_DONTNEED vs. MADV_FREE race "Hillf Danton" <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> - 2017-03-03 06:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/4] thp: fix MADV_DONTNEED vs. MADV_FREE race "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-03 11:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/4] thp: fix MADV_DONTNEED vs. MADV_FREE race Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> - 2017-03-06 03:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/4] thp: fix MADV_DONTNEED vs. MADV_FREE race "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> - 2017-03-07 15:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/4] thp: fix MADV_DONTNEED vs. MADV_FREE race "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-03-06 03:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/4] thp: fix MADV_DONTNEED vs. MADV_FREE race "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> - 2017-03-07 15:50 +0100
[PATCH 1/4] thp: reduce indentation level in change_huge_pmd() "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-02 17:00 +0100
[PATCH 2/4] thp: fix MADV_DONTNEED vs. numa balancing race "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-03 03:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/4] thp: fix MADV_DONTNEED vs. numa balancing race Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> - 2017-03-03 18:20 +0100
| From | "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-02 16:20 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH 0/4] thp: fix few MADV_DONTNEED races |
| Message-ID | <tgAGm-4bI-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
For MADV_DONTNEED to work properly with huge pages, it's critical to not clear pmd intermittently unless you hold down_write(mmap_sem). Otherwise MADV_DONTNEED can miss the THP which can lead to userspace breakage. See example of such race in commit message of patch 2/4. All these races are found by code inspection. I haven't seen them triggered. I don't think it's worth to apply them to stable@. Kirill A. Shutemov (4): thp: reduce indentation level in change_huge_pmd() thp: fix MADV_DONTNEED vs. numa balancing race thp: fix MADV_DONTNEED vs. MADV_FREE race thp: fix MADV_DONTNEED vs clear soft dirty race fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 9 +++++- mm/huge_memory.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ 2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) -- 2.11.0
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-02 17:00 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH 4/4] thp: fix MADV_DONTNEED vs clear soft dirty race |
| Message-ID | <tgBj4-4tT-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1591182 |
Yet another instance of the same race.
Fix is identical to change_huge_pmd().
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
---
fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
index ee3efb229ef6..0ce5294abc2c 100644
--- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
+++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
@@ -899,7 +899,14 @@ static inline void clear_soft_dirty(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
static inline void clear_soft_dirty_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
unsigned long addr, pmd_t *pmdp)
{
- pmd_t pmd = pmdp_huge_get_and_clear(vma->vm_mm, addr, pmdp);
+ pmd_t pmd = *pmdp;
+
+ /* See comment in change_huge_pmd() */
+ pmdp_invalidate(vma, addr, pmdp);
+ if (pmd_dirty(*pmdp))
+ pmd = pmd_mkdirty(pmd);
+ if (pmd_young(*pmdp))
+ pmd = pmd_mkyoung(pmd);
pmd = pmd_wrprotect(pmd);
pmd = pmd_clear_soft_dirty(pmd);
--
2.11.0
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-03 23:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 4/4] thp: fix MADV_DONTNEED vs clear soft dirty race |
| Message-ID | <th4bn-7P9-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1591221 |
On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 18:10:34 +0300 "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> wrote: > Yet another instance of the same race. > > Fix is identical to change_huge_pmd(). Nit: someone who is reading this changelog a year from now will be quite confused - how do they work out what the race was? I'll add : See "thp: fix MADV_DONTNEED vs. numa balancing race" for more details. to the changelogs to help them a bit. Also, it wasn't a great idea to start this series with a "Restructure code in preparation for a fix". If people later start hitting this race, the fixes will be difficult to backport. I'm OK with taking that risk, but please do bear this in mind in the future.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-02 17:00 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH 3/4] thp: fix MADV_DONTNEED vs. MADV_FREE race |
| Message-ID | <tgBj4-4tT-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1591182 |
Basically the same race as with numa balancing in change_huge_pmd(), but
a bit simpler to mitigate: we don't need to preserve dirty/young flags
here due to MADV_FREE functionality.
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
---
mm/huge_memory.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index bb2b3646bd78..324217c31ec9 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -1566,8 +1566,6 @@ bool madvise_free_huge_pmd(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
deactivate_page(page);
if (pmd_young(orig_pmd) || pmd_dirty(orig_pmd)) {
- orig_pmd = pmdp_huge_get_and_clear_full(tlb->mm, addr, pmd,
- tlb->fullmm);
orig_pmd = pmd_mkold(orig_pmd);
orig_pmd = pmd_mkclean(orig_pmd);
--
2.11.0
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Hillf Danton" <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-03 06:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/4] thp: fix MADV_DONTNEED vs. MADV_FREE race |
| Message-ID | <tgO6B-4U0-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1591223 |
On March 02, 2017 11:11 PM Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>
> Basically the same race as with numa balancing in change_huge_pmd(), but
> a bit simpler to mitigate: we don't need to preserve dirty/young flags
> here due to MADV_FREE functionality.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
> ---
> mm/huge_memory.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index bb2b3646bd78..324217c31ec9 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -1566,8 +1566,6 @@ bool madvise_free_huge_pmd(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> deactivate_page(page);
>
> if (pmd_young(orig_pmd) || pmd_dirty(orig_pmd)) {
> - orig_pmd = pmdp_huge_get_and_clear_full(tlb->mm, addr, pmd,
> - tlb->fullmm);
> orig_pmd = pmd_mkold(orig_pmd);
> orig_pmd = pmd_mkclean(orig_pmd);
>
$ grep -n set_pmd_at linux-4.10/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable-book3s64.c
/*
* set a new huge pmd. We should not be called for updating
* an existing pmd entry. That should go via pmd_hugepage_update.
*/
void set_pmd_at(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-03 11:30 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/4] thp: fix MADV_DONTNEED vs. MADV_FREE race |
| Message-ID | <tgSDg-8hC-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1591668 |
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 01:35:11PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
>
> On March 02, 2017 11:11 PM Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> >
> > Basically the same race as with numa balancing in change_huge_pmd(), but
> > a bit simpler to mitigate: we don't need to preserve dirty/young flags
> > here due to MADV_FREE functionality.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > mm/huge_memory.c | 2 --
> > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > index bb2b3646bd78..324217c31ec9 100644
> > --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> > +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > @@ -1566,8 +1566,6 @@ bool madvise_free_huge_pmd(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > deactivate_page(page);
> >
> > if (pmd_young(orig_pmd) || pmd_dirty(orig_pmd)) {
> > - orig_pmd = pmdp_huge_get_and_clear_full(tlb->mm, addr, pmd,
> > - tlb->fullmm);
> > orig_pmd = pmd_mkold(orig_pmd);
> > orig_pmd = pmd_mkclean(orig_pmd);
> >
> $ grep -n set_pmd_at linux-4.10/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable-book3s64.c
>
> /*
> * set a new huge pmd. We should not be called for updating
> * an existing pmd entry. That should go via pmd_hugepage_update.
> */
> void set_pmd_at(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
+Aneesh.
Urgh... Power is special again.
I think this should work fine.
From 056914fa025992c0a2212aee057c26307ce60238 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 16:47:45 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] thp: fix MADV_DONTNEED vs. MADV_FREE race
Basically the same race as with numa balancing in change_huge_pmd(), but
a bit simpler to mitigate: we don't need to preserve dirty/young flags
here due to MADV_FREE functionality.
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
---
mm/huge_memory.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index bb2b3646bd78..23c1b3d58cf4 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -1566,8 +1566,7 @@ bool madvise_free_huge_pmd(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
deactivate_page(page);
if (pmd_young(orig_pmd) || pmd_dirty(orig_pmd)) {
- orig_pmd = pmdp_huge_get_and_clear_full(tlb->mm, addr, pmd,
- tlb->fullmm);
+ pmdp_invalidate(vma, addr, pmd);
orig_pmd = pmd_mkold(orig_pmd);
orig_pmd = pmd_mkclean(orig_pmd);
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-06 03:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/4] thp: fix MADV_DONTNEED vs. MADV_FREE race |
| Message-ID | <thQ6l-DU-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1591839 |
Hello, Kirill,
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 01:26:36PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 01:35:11PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> >
> > On March 02, 2017 11:11 PM Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > >
> > > Basically the same race as with numa balancing in change_huge_pmd(), but
> > > a bit simpler to mitigate: we don't need to preserve dirty/young flags
> > > here due to MADV_FREE functionality.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
> > > ---
> > > mm/huge_memory.c | 2 --
> > > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > > index bb2b3646bd78..324217c31ec9 100644
> > > --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> > > +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > > @@ -1566,8 +1566,6 @@ bool madvise_free_huge_pmd(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > > deactivate_page(page);
> > >
> > > if (pmd_young(orig_pmd) || pmd_dirty(orig_pmd)) {
> > > - orig_pmd = pmdp_huge_get_and_clear_full(tlb->mm, addr, pmd,
> > > - tlb->fullmm);
> > > orig_pmd = pmd_mkold(orig_pmd);
> > > orig_pmd = pmd_mkclean(orig_pmd);
> > >
> > $ grep -n set_pmd_at linux-4.10/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable-book3s64.c
> >
> > /*
> > * set a new huge pmd. We should not be called for updating
> > * an existing pmd entry. That should go via pmd_hugepage_update.
> > */
> > void set_pmd_at(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>
> +Aneesh.
>
> Urgh... Power is special again.
>
> I think this should work fine.
>
> From 056914fa025992c0a2212aee057c26307ce60238 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 16:47:45 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH] thp: fix MADV_DONTNEED vs. MADV_FREE race
>
> Basically the same race as with numa balancing in change_huge_pmd(), but
> a bit simpler to mitigate: we don't need to preserve dirty/young flags
> here due to MADV_FREE functionality.
Could you elaborate a bit more here rather than relying on other
patch's description?
And could you say what happens to the userspace if that race
happens? When I guess from title "MADV_DONTNEED vs MADV_FREE",
a page cannot be zapped but marked lazyfree or vise versa? Right?
Thanks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
> ---
> mm/huge_memory.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index bb2b3646bd78..23c1b3d58cf4 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -1566,8 +1566,7 @@ bool madvise_free_huge_pmd(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> deactivate_page(page);
>
> if (pmd_young(orig_pmd) || pmd_dirty(orig_pmd)) {
> - orig_pmd = pmdp_huge_get_and_clear_full(tlb->mm, addr, pmd,
> - tlb->fullmm);
> + pmdp_invalidate(vma, addr, pmd);
> orig_pmd = pmd_mkold(orig_pmd);
> orig_pmd = pmd_mkclean(orig_pmd);
>
> --
> Kirill A. Shutemov
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-07 15:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/4] thp: fix MADV_DONTNEED vs. MADV_FREE race |
| Message-ID | <tioro-lc-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1592886 |
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 10:44:46AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hello, Kirill,
>
> On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 01:26:36PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 01:35:11PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> > >
> > > On March 02, 2017 11:11 PM Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Basically the same race as with numa balancing in change_huge_pmd(), but
> > > > a bit simpler to mitigate: we don't need to preserve dirty/young flags
> > > > here due to MADV_FREE functionality.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> > > > Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
> > > > ---
> > > > mm/huge_memory.c | 2 --
> > > > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > > > index bb2b3646bd78..324217c31ec9 100644
> > > > --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> > > > +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > > > @@ -1566,8 +1566,6 @@ bool madvise_free_huge_pmd(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > > > deactivate_page(page);
> > > >
> > > > if (pmd_young(orig_pmd) || pmd_dirty(orig_pmd)) {
> > > > - orig_pmd = pmdp_huge_get_and_clear_full(tlb->mm, addr, pmd,
> > > > - tlb->fullmm);
> > > > orig_pmd = pmd_mkold(orig_pmd);
> > > > orig_pmd = pmd_mkclean(orig_pmd);
> > > >
> > > $ grep -n set_pmd_at linux-4.10/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable-book3s64.c
> > >
> > > /*
> > > * set a new huge pmd. We should not be called for updating
> > > * an existing pmd entry. That should go via pmd_hugepage_update.
> > > */
> > > void set_pmd_at(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> >
> > +Aneesh.
> >
> > Urgh... Power is special again.
> >
> > I think this should work fine.
> >
> > From 056914fa025992c0a2212aee057c26307ce60238 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> > Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 16:47:45 +0300
> > Subject: [PATCH] thp: fix MADV_DONTNEED vs. MADV_FREE race
> >
> > Basically the same race as with numa balancing in change_huge_pmd(), but
> > a bit simpler to mitigate: we don't need to preserve dirty/young flags
> > here due to MADV_FREE functionality.
>
> Could you elaborate a bit more here rather than relying on other
> patch's description?
Okay, updated patch is below.
> And could you say what happens to the userspace if that race
> happens? When I guess from title "MADV_DONTNEED vs MADV_FREE",
> a page cannot be zapped but marked lazyfree or vise versa? Right?
"Vise versa" part should be fine. The case I'm worry about is that
MADV_DONTNEED would skip the pmd and it will not be cleared.
Userspace expects the area of memory to be clean after MADV_DONTNEED, but
it's not. It can lead to userspace misbehaviour.
From a0967b0293a6f8053d85785c4d6340e550e849ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 16:47:45 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] thp: fix MADV_DONTNEED vs. MADV_FREE race
Both MADV_DONTNEED and MADV_FREE handled with down_read(mmap_sem).
It's critical to not clear pmd intermittently while handling MADV_FREE to
avoid race with MADV_DONTNEED:
CPU0: CPU1:
madvise_free_huge_pmd()
pmdp_huge_get_and_clear_full()
madvise_dontneed()
zap_pmd_range()
pmd_trans_huge(*pmd) == 0 (without ptl)
// skip the pmd
set_pmd_at();
// pmd is re-established
It results in MADV_DONTNEED skipping the pmd, leaving it not cleared. It
violates MADV_DONTNEED interface and can result is userspace misbehaviour.
Basically it's the same race as with numa balancing in change_huge_pmd(),
but a bit simpler to mitigate: we don't need to preserve dirty/young flags
here due to MADV_FREE functionality.
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
---
mm/huge_memory.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index 51a8c376d020..3c9ef1104d85 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -1568,8 +1568,7 @@ bool madvise_free_huge_pmd(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
deactivate_page(page);
if (pmd_young(orig_pmd) || pmd_dirty(orig_pmd)) {
- orig_pmd = pmdp_huge_get_and_clear_full(tlb->mm, addr, pmd,
- tlb->fullmm);
+ pmdp_invalidate(vma, addr, pmd);
orig_pmd = pmd_mkold(orig_pmd);
orig_pmd = pmd_mkclean(orig_pmd);
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-06 03:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/4] thp: fix MADV_DONTNEED vs. MADV_FREE race |
| Message-ID | <thQSJ-1dU-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1591223 |
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> writes:
> Basically the same race as with numa balancing in change_huge_pmd(), but
> a bit simpler to mitigate: we don't need to preserve dirty/young flags
> here due to MADV_FREE functionality.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
> ---
> mm/huge_memory.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index bb2b3646bd78..324217c31ec9 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -1566,8 +1566,6 @@ bool madvise_free_huge_pmd(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> deactivate_page(page);
>
> if (pmd_young(orig_pmd) || pmd_dirty(orig_pmd)) {
> - orig_pmd = pmdp_huge_get_and_clear_full(tlb->mm, addr, pmd,
> - tlb->fullmm);
> orig_pmd = pmd_mkold(orig_pmd);
> orig_pmd = pmd_mkclean(orig_pmd);
>
Instead can we do a new interface that does something like
pmdp_huge_update(tlb->mm, addr, pmd, new_pmd);
We do have a variant already in ptep_set_access_flags. What we need is
something that can be used to update THP pmd, without converting it to
pmd_none and one which doens't loose reference and change bit ?
-aneesh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-07 15:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/4] thp: fix MADV_DONTNEED vs. MADV_FREE race |
| Message-ID | <tioB4-pr-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1592900 |
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 08:19:03AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> writes:
>
> > Basically the same race as with numa balancing in change_huge_pmd(), but
> > a bit simpler to mitigate: we don't need to preserve dirty/young flags
> > here due to MADV_FREE functionality.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > mm/huge_memory.c | 2 --
> > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > index bb2b3646bd78..324217c31ec9 100644
> > --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> > +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > @@ -1566,8 +1566,6 @@ bool madvise_free_huge_pmd(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > deactivate_page(page);
> >
> > if (pmd_young(orig_pmd) || pmd_dirty(orig_pmd)) {
> > - orig_pmd = pmdp_huge_get_and_clear_full(tlb->mm, addr, pmd,
> > - tlb->fullmm);
> > orig_pmd = pmd_mkold(orig_pmd);
> > orig_pmd = pmd_mkclean(orig_pmd);
> >
>
> Instead can we do a new interface that does something like
>
> pmdp_huge_update(tlb->mm, addr, pmd, new_pmd);
>
> We do have a variant already in ptep_set_access_flags. What we need is
> something that can be used to update THP pmd, without converting it to
> pmd_none and one which doens't loose reference and change bit ?
Sounds like a good idea. Would you volunteer to implement it?
I don't have time for this right now.
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-02 17:00 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH 1/4] thp: reduce indentation level in change_huge_pmd() |
| Message-ID | <tgBj5-4tT-35@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1591182 |
Restructure code in preparation for a fix.
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
---
mm/huge_memory.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index 71e3dede95b4..e7ce73b2b208 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -1722,37 +1722,37 @@ int change_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
{
struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
spinlock_t *ptl;
- int ret = 0;
+ pmd_t entry;
+ bool preserve_write;
+ int ret;
ptl = __pmd_trans_huge_lock(pmd, vma);
- if (ptl) {
- pmd_t entry;
- bool preserve_write = prot_numa && pmd_write(*pmd);
- ret = 1;
+ if (!ptl)
+ return 0;
- /*
- * Avoid trapping faults against the zero page. The read-only
- * data is likely to be read-cached on the local CPU and
- * local/remote hits to the zero page are not interesting.
- */
- if (prot_numa && is_huge_zero_pmd(*pmd)) {
- spin_unlock(ptl);
- return ret;
- }
+ preserve_write = prot_numa && pmd_write(*pmd);
+ ret = 1;
- if (!prot_numa || !pmd_protnone(*pmd)) {
- entry = pmdp_huge_get_and_clear_notify(mm, addr, pmd);
- entry = pmd_modify(entry, newprot);
- if (preserve_write)
- entry = pmd_mk_savedwrite(entry);
- ret = HPAGE_PMD_NR;
- set_pmd_at(mm, addr, pmd, entry);
- BUG_ON(vma_is_anonymous(vma) && !preserve_write &&
- pmd_write(entry));
- }
- spin_unlock(ptl);
- }
+ /*
+ * Avoid trapping faults against the zero page. The read-only
+ * data is likely to be read-cached on the local CPU and
+ * local/remote hits to the zero page are not interesting.
+ */
+ if (prot_numa && is_huge_zero_pmd(*pmd))
+ goto unlock;
+ if (prot_numa && pmd_protnone(*pmd))
+ goto unlock;
+
+ entry = pmdp_huge_get_and_clear_notify(mm, addr, pmd);
+ entry = pmd_modify(entry, newprot);
+ if (preserve_write)
+ entry = pmd_mk_savedwrite(entry);
+ ret = HPAGE_PMD_NR;
+ set_pmd_at(mm, addr, pmd, entry);
+ BUG_ON(vma_is_anonymous(vma) && !preserve_write && pmd_write(entry));
+unlock:
+ spin_unlock(ptl);
return ret;
}
--
2.11.0
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-03 03:20 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH 2/4] thp: fix MADV_DONTNEED vs. numa balancing race |
| Message-ID | <tgKZ3-2I4-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1591182 |
In case prot_numa, we are under down_read(mmap_sem). It's critical to not clear pmd intermittently to avoid race with MADV_DONTNEED which is also under down_read(mmap_sem): CPU0: CPU1: change_huge_pmd(prot_numa=1) pmdp_huge_get_and_clear_notify() madvise_dontneed() zap_pmd_range() pmd_trans_huge(*pmd) == 0 (without ptl) // skip the pmd set_pmd_at(); // pmd is re-established The race makes MADV_DONTNEED miss the huge pmd and don't clear it which may break userspace. Found by code analysis, never saw triggered. Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> --- mm/huge_memory.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c index e7ce73b2b208..bb2b3646bd78 100644 --- a/mm/huge_memory.c +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c @@ -1744,7 +1744,39 @@ int change_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd, if (prot_numa && pmd_protnone(*pmd)) goto unlock; - entry = pmdp_huge_get_and_clear_notify(mm, addr, pmd); + /* + * In case prot_numa, we are under down_read(mmap_sem). It's critical + * to not clear pmd intermittently to avoid race with MADV_DONTNEED + * which is also under down_read(mmap_sem): + * + * CPU0: CPU1: + * change_huge_pmd(prot_numa=1) + * pmdp_huge_get_and_clear_notify() + * madvise_dontneed() + * zap_pmd_range() + * pmd_trans_huge(*pmd) == 0 (without ptl) + * // skip the pmd + * set_pmd_at(); + * // pmd is re-established + * + * The race makes MADV_DONTNEED miss the huge pmd and don't clear it + * which may break userspace. + * + * pmdp_invalidate() is required to make sure we don't miss + * dirty/young flags set by hardware. + */ + entry = *pmd; + pmdp_invalidate(vma, addr, pmd); + + /* + * Recover dirty/young flags. It relies on pmdp_invalidate to not + * corrupt them. + */ + if (pmd_dirty(*pmd)) + entry = pmd_mkdirty(entry); + if (pmd_young(*pmd)) + entry = pmd_mkyoung(entry); + entry = pmd_modify(entry, newprot); if (preserve_write) entry = pmd_mk_savedwrite(entry); -- 2.11.0
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-03 18:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/4] thp: fix MADV_DONTNEED vs. numa balancing race |
| Message-ID | <tgZ22-4jz-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1591627 |
On 03/02/2017 07:10 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > @@ -1744,7 +1744,39 @@ int change_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd, > if (prot_numa && pmd_protnone(*pmd)) > goto unlock; > > - entry = pmdp_huge_get_and_clear_notify(mm, addr, pmd); Are there any remaining call sites for pmdp_huge_get_and_clear_notify() after this?
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web