Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1590813 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v5 06/13] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature

Started byByungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
First post2017-03-02 04:00 +0100
Last post2017-03-02 04:00 +0100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH v5 06/13] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2017-03-02 04:00 +0100

#1590813 — Re: [PATCH v5 06/13] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature

FromByungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Date2017-03-02 04:00 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 06/13] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature
Message-ID<tgp8d-44Y-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 02:17:07PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > > +void lock_commit_crosslock(struct lockdep_map *lock)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct cross_lock *xlock;
> > > +	unsigned long flags;
> > > +
> > > +	if (!current->xhlocks)
> > > +		return;
> > > +
> > > +	if (unlikely(current->lockdep_recursion))
> > > +		return;
> > > +
> > > +	raw_local_irq_save(flags);
> > > +	check_flags(flags);
> > > +	current->lockdep_recursion = 1;
> > > +
> > > +	if (unlikely(!debug_locks))
> > > +		return;
> > > +
> > > +	if (!graph_lock())
> > > +		return;
> > > +
> > > +	xlock = &((struct lockdep_map_cross *)lock)->xlock;
> > > +	if (atomic_read(&xlock->ref) > 0 && !commit_xhlocks(xlock))
> > 
> > You terminate with graph_lock() held.
> 
> Oops. What did I do? I'll fix it.

I remembered it. It's no problem because it would terminate there, only
if _both_ 'xlock->ref > 0' and 'commit_xhlocks returns 0' are true.
Otherwise, it will unlock the lock safely.

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web