Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1590534 > unrolled thread
| Started by | David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-03-01 19:00 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-03-01 19:00 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH net] rxrpc: Fix deadlock between call creation and sendmsg/recvmsg David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2017-03-01 19:00 +0100
| From | David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-01 19:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH net] rxrpc: Fix deadlock between call creation and sendmsg/recvmsg |
| Message-ID | <tggHD-6rz-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 15:43:06 +0000 > All the routines by which rxrpc is accessed from the outside are serialised > by means of the socket lock (sendmsg, recvmsg, bind, > rxrpc_kernel_begin_call(), ...) and this presents a problem: ... > Fix this by: ... > This patch has the nice bonus that calls on the same socket are now to some > extent parallelisable. > > > Note that we might want to move rxrpc_service_prealloc() calls out from the > socket lock and give it its own lock, so that we don't hang progress in > other calls because we're waiting for the allocator. > > We probably also want to avoid calling rxrpc_notify_socket() from within > the socket lock (rxrpc_accept_call()). > > Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> > Tested-by: Marc Dionne <marc.c.dionne@auristor.com> Applied, thanks David.
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web