Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1590111 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-03-01 10:10 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-03-03 10:50 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH -v4 00/10] FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI wobbles Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-03-01 10:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH -v4 00/10] FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI wobbles Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-03-03 10:50 +0100
| From | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-01 10:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH -v4 00/10] FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI wobbles |
| Message-ID | <tg8qK-Tq-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Wed, 22 Feb 2017, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 12:02:44PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > OK, so after having not thought about this, and then spend the last two > > days trying to cram all this nonsense back into my head, I think I have > > a slightly simpler option. > > > > In any case, I'll go respin the patch-set and repost. > > That is; what is wrong with the below patch against mainline? After staring at it for a couple of hours and paging the futex horror back in, I don't see any problem with that. Thanks, tglx
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-03 10:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tgS0x-7G0-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1590111 |
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 10:05:22AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Wed, 22 Feb 2017, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 12:02:44PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > OK, so after having not thought about this, and then spend the last two > > > days trying to cram all this nonsense back into my head, I think I have > > > a slightly simpler option. > > > > > > In any case, I'll go respin the patch-set and repost. > > > > That is; what is wrong with the below patch against mainline? > > After staring at it for a couple of hours and paging the futex horror back > in, I don't see any problem with that. Awesome, that makes things simpler. Let me go respin the patches.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web