Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1591137 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-03-02 15:30 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-03-02 21:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: DIfferent BogoMIPS value after bbaa06702719 ("clocksource/drivers/arm_global_timer: Register delay timer") Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> - 2017-03-02 15:30 +0100
Re: DIfferent BogoMIPS value after bbaa06702719 ("clocksource/drivers/arm_global_timer: Register delay timer") Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl> - 2017-03-02 21:40 +0100
| From | Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-02 15:30 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: DIfferent BogoMIPS value after bbaa06702719 ("clocksource/drivers/arm_global_timer: Register delay timer") |
| Message-ID | <tgzTZ-3s2-37@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 02:36:23PM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just updated kernel on my SmartRG SR400ac (bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts) from
> 4.4 to 4.9 and noticed that this part of the log:
> [ 0.020820] Calibrating delay loop... 1594.16 BogoMIPS (lpj=7970816)
> (...)
> [ 0.190806] Brought up 2 CPUs
> [ 0.200022] SMP: Total of 2 processors activated (3188.32 BogoMIPS).
>
> became:
> [ 0.027082] Calibrating delay loop (skipped), value calculated using timer frequency.. 800.00 BogoMIPS (lpj=4000000)
> (...)
> [ 0.078858] Brought up 2 CPUs
> [ 0.088254] SMP: Total of 2 processors activated (1600.00 BogoMIPS).
>
> This is caused by commit bbaa06702719 ("clocksource/drivers/arm_global_timer:
> Register delay timer").
>
> Is this something expected?
Yes.
> Or should I be worried about this? I'm aware it's just BogoMIPS, but I
> still prefer to ask :)
It's *bogus*. Bogomips is the calibration value that the kernel uses
to achieve delays. It has nothing to do with the speed of the CPU on
modern systems that use a timer instead. (In that case, it's a
calibration value for the timer, rather than a calibration value for
the number of software loops required to achieve a delay.)
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-02 21:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tgFG2-7vm-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1591137 |
On 03/02/2017 03:13 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 02:36:23PM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just updated kernel on my SmartRG SR400ac (bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts) from
>> 4.4 to 4.9 and noticed that this part of the log:
>> [ 0.020820] Calibrating delay loop... 1594.16 BogoMIPS (lpj=7970816)
>> (...)
>> [ 0.190806] Brought up 2 CPUs
>> [ 0.200022] SMP: Total of 2 processors activated (3188.32 BogoMIPS).
>>
>> became:
>> [ 0.027082] Calibrating delay loop (skipped), value calculated using timer frequency.. 800.00 BogoMIPS (lpj=4000000)
>> (...)
>> [ 0.078858] Brought up 2 CPUs
>> [ 0.088254] SMP: Total of 2 processors activated (1600.00 BogoMIPS).
>>
>> This is caused by commit bbaa06702719 ("clocksource/drivers/arm_global_timer:
>> Register delay timer").
>>
>> Is this something expected?
>
> Yes.
>
>> Or should I be worried about this? I'm aware it's just BogoMIPS, but I
>> still prefer to ask :)
>
> It's *bogus*. Bogomips is the calibration value that the kernel uses
> to achieve delays. It has nothing to do with the speed of the CPU on
> modern systems that use a timer instead. (In that case, it's a
> calibration value for the timer, rather than a calibration value for
> the number of software loops required to achieve a delay.)
Now I can sleep calm ;) thanks!
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web