Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1591370 > unrolled thread

[PATCH v2 07/21] x86/xen: split xen_smp_intr_init()/xen_smp_intr_free()

Started byVitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
First post2017-03-02 19:10 +0100
Last post2017-03-13 08:40 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [PATCH v2 07/21] x86/xen: split xen_smp_intr_init()/xen_smp_intr_free() Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> - 2017-03-02 19:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v2 07/21] x86/xen: split  xen_smp_intr_init()/xen_smp_intr_free() Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> - 2017-03-13 08:40 +0100

#1591370 — [PATCH v2 07/21] x86/xen: split xen_smp_intr_init()/xen_smp_intr_free()

FromVitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Date2017-03-02 19:10 +0100
Subject[PATCH v2 07/21] x86/xen: split xen_smp_intr_init()/xen_smp_intr_free()
Message-ID<tgDkS-63W-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
xen_smp_intr_init() and xen_smp_intr_free() have PV-specific code and as
a praparatory change to splitting smp.c we need to split these fucntions.
Create xen_smp_intr_init_pv()/xen_smp_intr_free_pv().

Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
---
 arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c |  9 +++++++++
 arch/x86/xen/smp.c          | 29 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
 arch/x86/xen/smp.h          |  8 ++++++++
 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c
index b9ff23c..acfd896 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c
@@ -1478,12 +1478,21 @@ static int xen_cpu_up_prepare_pv(unsigned int cpu)
 		     cpu, rc);
 		return rc;
 	}
+
+	rc = xen_smp_intr_init_pv(cpu);
+	if (rc) {
+		WARN(1, "xen_smp_intr_init_pv() for CPU %d failed: %d\n",
+		     cpu, rc);
+		return rc;
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
 static int xen_cpu_dead_pv(unsigned int cpu)
 {
 	xen_smp_intr_free(cpu);
+	xen_smp_intr_free_pv(cpu);
 
 	xen_teardown_timer(cpu);
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/smp.c b/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
index 0dee6f5..ff6aaff 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
@@ -132,9 +132,10 @@ void xen_smp_intr_free(unsigned int cpu)
 		kfree(per_cpu(xen_callfuncsingle_irq, cpu).name);
 		per_cpu(xen_callfuncsingle_irq, cpu).name = NULL;
 	}
-	if (xen_hvm_domain())
-		return;
+}
 
+void xen_smp_intr_free_pv(unsigned int cpu)
+{
 	if (per_cpu(xen_irq_work, cpu).irq >= 0) {
 		unbind_from_irqhandler(per_cpu(xen_irq_work, cpu).irq, NULL);
 		per_cpu(xen_irq_work, cpu).irq = -1;
@@ -148,11 +149,12 @@ void xen_smp_intr_free(unsigned int cpu)
 		kfree(per_cpu(xen_pmu_irq, cpu).name);
 		per_cpu(xen_pmu_irq, cpu).name = NULL;
 	}
-};
+}
+
 int xen_smp_intr_init(unsigned int cpu)
 {
 	int rc;
-	char *resched_name, *callfunc_name, *debug_name, *pmu_name;
+	char *resched_name, *callfunc_name, *debug_name;
 
 	resched_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "resched%d", cpu);
 	rc = bind_ipi_to_irqhandler(XEN_RESCHEDULE_VECTOR,
@@ -199,12 +201,17 @@ int xen_smp_intr_init(unsigned int cpu)
 	per_cpu(xen_callfuncsingle_irq, cpu).irq = rc;
 	per_cpu(xen_callfuncsingle_irq, cpu).name = callfunc_name;
 
-	/*
-	 * The IRQ worker on PVHVM goes through the native path and uses the
-	 * IPI mechanism.
-	 */
-	if (xen_hvm_domain())
-		return 0;
+	return 0;
+
+ fail:
+	xen_smp_intr_free(cpu);
+	return rc;
+}
+
+int xen_smp_intr_init_pv(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+	int rc;
+	char *callfunc_name, *pmu_name;
 
 	callfunc_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "irqwork%d", cpu);
 	rc = bind_ipi_to_irqhandler(XEN_IRQ_WORK_VECTOR,
@@ -233,7 +240,7 @@ int xen_smp_intr_init(unsigned int cpu)
 	return 0;
 
  fail:
-	xen_smp_intr_free(cpu);
+	xen_smp_intr_free_pv(cpu);
 	return rc;
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/smp.h b/arch/x86/xen/smp.h
index 9beef33..a059adb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/smp.h
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/smp.h
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@ extern void xen_send_IPI_self(int vector);
 
 extern int xen_smp_intr_init(unsigned int cpu);
 extern void xen_smp_intr_free(unsigned int cpu);
+extern int xen_smp_intr_init_pv(unsigned int cpu);
+extern void xen_smp_intr_free_pv(unsigned int cpu);
 
 #else /* CONFIG_SMP */
 
@@ -19,6 +21,12 @@ static inline int xen_smp_intr_init(unsigned int cpu)
 	return 0;
 }
 static inline void xen_smp_intr_free(unsigned int cpu) {}
+
+static inline int xen_smp_intr_init_pv(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+static inline void xen_smp_intr_free_pv(unsigned int cpu) {}
 #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
 
 #endif
-- 
2.9.3

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1598914 — Re: [PATCH v2 07/21] x86/xen: split xen_smp_intr_init()/xen_smp_intr_free()

FromJuergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Date2017-03-13 08:40 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 07/21] x86/xen: split xen_smp_intr_init()/xen_smp_intr_free()
Message-ID<tksKe-5zs-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1591370
On 02/03/17 18:53, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> xen_smp_intr_init() and xen_smp_intr_free() have PV-specific code and as
> a praparatory change to splitting smp.c we need to split these fucntions.
> Create xen_smp_intr_init_pv()/xen_smp_intr_free_pv().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>


Juergen

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web