Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1590291 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-03-01 13:10 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-03-02 17:30 +0100 |
| Articles | 7 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Problem with RSA test from testmgr Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> - 2017-03-01 13:10 +0100
Re: Problem with RSA test from testmgr Stephan Müller <smueller@chronox.de> - 2017-03-01 16:10 +0100
Re: Problem with RSA test from testmgr Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> - 2017-03-02 07:40 +0100
Re: Problem with RSA test from testmgr Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@intel.com> - 2017-03-02 17:40 +0100
Re: Problem with RSA test from testmgr Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@intel.com> - 2017-03-02 03:20 +0100
Re: Problem with RSA test from testmgr Stephan Müller <smueller@chronox.de> - 2017-03-02 07:40 +0100
Re: Problem with RSA test from testmgr Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@intel.com> - 2017-03-02 17:30 +0100
| From | Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-01 13:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Problem with RSA test from testmgr |
| Message-ID | <tgbeW-2ST-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:35:04PM +0100, Stephan Müller wrote: > Am Dienstag, 28. Februar 2017, 17:45:53 CET schrieb Corentin Labbe: > > Hi Corentin, > > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 05:08:35PM +0100, Stephan Müller wrote: > > > Am Dienstag, 28. Februar 2017, 16:59:53 CET schrieb Corentin Labbe: > > > > > > Hi Corentin, > > > > > > > hello > > > > > > > > I work on the sun8i-ce crypto accelerator and I have some problem with > > > > the > > > > RSA part. > > > > > > > > The RSA register fail at the first RSA test (encrypt 512bit) with this > > > > output: [ 8480.146843] alg: akcipher: encrypt test failed. Invalid > > > > output > > > > [ 8480.146871] 00000000: 6e 7c 8a 75 e7 30 80 d1 5e ab 9b db a2 cf ed db > > > > [ 8480.146897] 00000010: c9 b2 db 43 bd 9a b9 75 27 f3 73 d9 73 b7 81 8c > > > > [ 8480.146921] 00000020: 49 e8 45 fc 43 44 f5 6d f0 f7 b8 f2 ae 6b ae 49 > > > > [ 8480.146946] 00000030: 1b 8e 50 c6 88 4e 99 09 78 14 f2 5d 99 c3 7f f9 > > > > [ 8480.146995] alg: akcipher: test 1 failed for rsa-sun8i-ce, err=-22 > > > > > > > > But with the same parameters (msg, n, e) openssl give me exactly this > > > > output. > > > > > > > > So what I miss for made it work ? > > > > In which format testmgr expect the output data ? > > > > > > The output should be simply the binary string from the modular > > > exponentiation operation. > > > > > > What I am wondering is: the output logged above is not found in the > > > expected values of testmgr.h. Which input data or test vectors do you > > > use? > > > > > > Ciao > > > Stephan > > > > I use the first test from rsa_tv_template in crypto/testmgr.h > > The test fail on the encrypt operation. > > > > I have put below the openssl program that give me the same output than my > > hardware accelerator with the same parameters. > > I would think the issue is that the OpenSSL BIGNUM lib has some issues: when > calculating m^e mod n, m has to be equal to the key size. The kernel's MPI > code handles the case where m is smaller than the key size. > > Note, in your code below, ptext is the 8 bytes from ptext_ex plus trailing > zeroes whereas the kernel uses just the 8 bytes. > > It seems that your implementation has the same issue. > > What about the following test: change vector->m to be 64 bytes (i.e. > RSA_size(key) in size in testmgr.h and check the output of crypto/rsa.c, > openssl's output with the app below and your RSA hardware. I got the following: [ 1.086228] alg: akcipher: encrypt test failed. Invalid output [ 1.092196] 00000000: 6e 7c 8a 75 e7 30 80 d1 5e ab 9b db a2 cf ed db [ 1.098882] 00000010: c9 b2 db 43 bd 9a b9 75 27 f3 73 d9 73 b7 81 8c [ 1.105524] 00000020: 49 e8 45 fc 43 44 f5 6d f0 f7 b8 f2 ae 6b ae 49 [ 1.112090] 00000030: 1b 8e 50 c6 88 4e 99 09 78 14 f2 5d 99 c3 7f f9 [ 1.118747] alg: akcipher: test 1 failed for rsa-generic, err=-22 (Exactly the output of my hardare and openssl test) So the problem is just that my hardware does not handle non-padded data. Thanks Regards Corentin Labbe
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stephan Müller <smueller@chronox.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-01 16:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tge39-4N8-49@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1590291 |
Am Mittwoch, 1. März 2017, 13:04:14 CET schrieb Corentin Labbe: Hi Corentin, > > I got the following: > > [ 1.086228] alg: akcipher: encrypt test failed. Invalid output > [ 1.092196] 00000000: 6e 7c 8a 75 e7 30 80 d1 5e ab 9b db a2 cf ed db > [ 1.098882] 00000010: c9 b2 db 43 bd 9a b9 75 27 f3 73 d9 73 b7 81 8c > [ 1.105524] 00000020: 49 e8 45 fc 43 44 f5 6d f0 f7 b8 f2 ae 6b ae 49 > [ 1.112090] 00000030: 1b 8e 50 c6 88 4e 99 09 78 14 f2 5d 99 c3 7f f9 > [ 1.118747] alg: akcipher: test 1 failed for rsa-generic, err=-22 > (Exactly the output of my hardare and openssl test) > > So the problem is just that my hardware does not handle non-padded data. I guess the best course of action would be to patch the test vector to use the padded data. Ciao Stephan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-02 07:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tgsz7-6IB-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1590395 |
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 04:07:17PM +0100, Stephan Müller wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 1. März 2017, 13:04:14 CET schrieb Corentin Labbe: > > Hi Corentin, > > > > > I got the following: > > > > [ 1.086228] alg: akcipher: encrypt test failed. Invalid output > > [ 1.092196] 00000000: 6e 7c 8a 75 e7 30 80 d1 5e ab 9b db a2 cf ed db > > [ 1.098882] 00000010: c9 b2 db 43 bd 9a b9 75 27 f3 73 d9 73 b7 81 8c > > [ 1.105524] 00000020: 49 e8 45 fc 43 44 f5 6d f0 f7 b8 f2 ae 6b ae 49 > > [ 1.112090] 00000030: 1b 8e 50 c6 88 4e 99 09 78 14 f2 5d 99 c3 7f f9 > > [ 1.118747] alg: akcipher: test 1 failed for rsa-generic, err=-22 > > (Exactly the output of my hardare and openssl test) > > > > So the problem is just that my hardware does not handle non-padded data. > > I guess the best course of action would be to patch the test vector to use the > padded data. > > Ciao > Stephan I am finishing a patch that made testmgr test both (padded and unpadded). Regards Corentin Labbe
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-02 17:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tgBVM-4ZX-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1590864 |
On 03/01/2017 10:21 PM, Corentin Labbe wrote: > I am finishing a patch that made testmgr test both (padded and unpadded). Even if you patch the test vectors there is no guarantee that a user of the API will always have the plain text padded. It can be anything between 1 and the key size. This needs to be the driver who adds padding if needed. See how other implementations handle it. Thanks, -- Tadeusz
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-02 03:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tgovw-3Ky-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1590291 |
Hi Corentin, On 03/01/2017 04:04 AM, Corentin Labbe wrote: >> I would think the issue is that the OpenSSL BIGNUM lib has some issues: when >> calculating m^e mod n, m has to be equal to the key size. The kernel's MPI >> code handles the case where m is smaller than the key size. >> >> Note, in your code below, ptext is the 8 bytes from ptext_ex plus trailing >> zeroes whereas the kernel uses just the 8 bytes. >> >> It seems that your implementation has the same issue. >> >> What about the following test: change vector->m to be 64 bytes (i.e. >> RSA_size(key) in size in testmgr.h and check the output of crypto/rsa.c, >> openssl's output with the app below and your RSA hardware. > I got the following: > > [ 1.086228] alg: akcipher: encrypt test failed. Invalid output > [ 1.092196] 00000000: 6e 7c 8a 75 e7 30 80 d1 5e ab 9b db a2 cf ed db > [ 1.098882] 00000010: c9 b2 db 43 bd 9a b9 75 27 f3 73 d9 73 b7 81 8c > [ 1.105524] 00000020: 49 e8 45 fc 43 44 f5 6d f0 f7 b8 f2 ae 6b ae 49 > [ 1.112090] 00000030: 1b 8e 50 c6 88 4e 99 09 78 14 f2 5d 99 c3 7f f9 > [ 1.118747] alg: akcipher: test 1 failed for rsa-generic, err=-22 > (Exactly the output of my hardare and openssl test) > > So the problem is just that my hardware does not handle non-padded data. The difference between openssl's RSA_private_decrypt() and the akcipher api is that openssl only takes only one size, flen, for both src and dst buffers, so in your test app you need to do something like this: memset(ptextp, 0, 256); memcpy(ptextp + 64 - 8, ptext_ex, plen); key = RSA_new(); key->n = BN_bin2bn(n, sizeof(n)-1, key->n); key->e = BN_bin2bn(e, sizeof(e)-1, key->e); num = RSA_public_encrypt(RSA_size(key), ptextp, ctext, key, RSA_NO_PADDING); The akcipher API has separate sizes for both the src and dst. It is the length of the scatterlist in the akcipher_request. If a HW can't handle different buffers lengths then its driver needs to add the padding internally. Thanks, -- Tadeusz
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stephan Müller <smueller@chronox.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-02 07:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tgsz7-6IB-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1590804 |
Am Donnerstag, 2. März 2017, 03:15:13 CET schrieb Tadeusz Struk: Hi Tadeusz, > > memset(ptextp, 0, 256); > memcpy(ptextp + 64 - 8, ptext_ex, plen); I actually have tested that and it did not return the data the kernel implementation would return Ciao Stephan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-02 17:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tgBM5-4Vc-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1590862 |
Hi Stephan, On 03/01/2017 10:08 PM, Stephan Müller wrote: >> memset(ptextp, 0, 256); >> memcpy(ptextp + 64 - 8, ptext_ex, plen); > I actually have tested that and it did not return the data the kernel > implementation would return It did for me: Result 64 plen=8 63 1c cd 7b e1 7e e4 de c9 a8 89 a1 74 cb 3c 63 7d 24 ec 83 c3 15 e4 7f 73 05 34 d1 ec 22 bb 8a 5e 32 39 6d c1 1d 7d 50 3b 9f 7a ad f0 2e 25 53 9f 6e bd 4c 55 84 0c 9b cf 1a 4b 51 1e 9e 0c 06 Are you sure you are compering this with the fist test vector? http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/crypto/testmgr.h#L183 Thanks, -- Tadeusz
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web