Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1588550 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-02-27 10:00 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-02-27 10:00 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v5 1/7] arm64: allwinner: Kconfig: add essential pinctrl driver for H5 Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> - 2017-02-27 10:00 +0100
| From | Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-27 10:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 1/7] arm64: allwinner: Kconfig: add essential pinctrl driver for H5 |
| Message-ID | <tfpjX-374-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 09:19:50AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > H5 SoC has two pin controllers, one (in user manual called "CPUx") needs > a slightly advanced driver, and the other (called "CPUs") is just equal > to the on in H3, and the H3 driver can be just reused. > > Select the two necessary pinctrl drivers when building kernel for > Allwinner SoCs. > > Also add H5 in the option's description. > > Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.xyz> > --- > arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms > index 129cc5ae4091..81f0d6149c2e 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms > +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms > @@ -5,8 +5,11 @@ config ARCH_SUNXI > select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP > select PINCTRL > select PINCTRL_SUN50I_A64 > + select PINCTRL_SUN50I_H5 > + select PINCTRL_SUN8I_H3_R Why not add those options as def_bool instead? Being able to remove them certainly have values if you want to strip them down. > help > - This enables support for Allwinner sunxi based SoCs like the A64. > + This enables support for Allwinner sunxi based SoCs like the A64 > + and H5. There's no point in having an ever growing list of SoCs here. You can just remove the mention of the A64. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web