Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1588093 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-02-25 10:00 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-02-27 08:50 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 2/3] pwm: sunxi: Add A64 support Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> - 2017-02-25 10:00 +0100
Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 2/3] pwm: sunxi: Add A64 support Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> - 2017-02-27 08:50 +0100
| From | Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-25 10:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 2/3] pwm: sunxi: Add A64 support |
| Message-ID | <teGmR-5ie-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.xyz> wrote:
> A64 PWM controller has same register layout as sun4i driver, so it works
> by adding A64 specific data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.xyz>
> ---
> drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
> index 1284ffa05921..ca3431e03fb8 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
> @@ -290,6 +290,12 @@ static const struct sun4i_pwm_data sun4i_pwm_data_h3 = {
> .npwm = 1,
> };
>
> +static const struct sun4i_pwm_data sun4i_pwm_data_a64 = {
> + .has_prescaler_bypass = true,
> + .has_rdy = true,
> + .npwm = 1,
> +};
> +
This seems to be tha same as the H3. Any differences between the
H3 and A64? Otherwise please just use that compatible.
ChenYu
> static const struct of_device_id sun4i_pwm_dt_ids[] = {
> {
> .compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-pwm",
> @@ -307,6 +313,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id sun4i_pwm_dt_ids[] = {
> .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-h3-pwm",
> .data = &sun4i_pwm_data_h3,
> }, {
> + .compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64-pwm",
> + .data = &sun4i_pwm_data_a64,
> + }, {
> /* sentinel */
> },
> };
> --
> 2.11.1
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-sunxi+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-27 08:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tfoee-2mQ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1588093 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 05:23:09PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>
>
> 25.02.2017, 16:53, "Chen-Yu Tsai" <wens@csie.org>:
> > On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.xyz> wrote:
> >> A64 PWM controller has same register layout as sun4i driver, so it works
> >> by adding A64 specific data.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.xyz>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c | 9 +++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
> >> index 1284ffa05921..ca3431e03fb8 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
> >> @@ -290,6 +290,12 @@ static const struct sun4i_pwm_data sun4i_pwm_data_h3 = {
> >> .npwm = 1,
> >> };
> >>
> >> +static const struct sun4i_pwm_data sun4i_pwm_data_a64 = {
> >> + .has_prescaler_bypass = true,
> >> + .has_rdy = true,
> >> + .npwm = 1,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >
> > This seems to be tha same as the H3. Any differences between the
> > H3 and A64? Otherwise please just use that compatible.
>
> H3 is also same as A13...
>
> See http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2017-February/486595.html
What I meant was that you should have a compatible in your DT like this:
compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64-pwm", "allwinner,sun5i-a13-pwm".
There's no need to add a new one in the driver (for now).
And you still haven't fixed the size.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web