Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1589831 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Brendan Gregg <brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-02-28 23:00 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-02-28 23:00 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 11/13] fs: fix unsigned enum warning with gcc-4.2 Brendan Gregg <brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com> - 2017-02-28 23:00 +0100
| From | Brendan Gregg <brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-28 23:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 11/13] fs: fix unsigned enum warning with gcc-4.2 |
| Message-ID | <tfXYl-1Fm-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Brendan Gregg <brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 2:56 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > > > > With arm-linux-gcc-4.2, almost every file we build in the kernel ends > > up with this warning: > > > > include/linux/fs.h:2648: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false > > > > Thanks, I'd like to see this fixed as a similar warning gets printed > whenever running many of the bcc/BPF tools, which gets annoying and is > user-visible. eg: > > # /usr/share/bcc/tools/xfsslower 1 > In file included from /virtual/main.c:3: > /lib/modules/4.8.6-300.fc25.x86_64/build/include/linux/fs.h:2677:9: > warning: comparison of unsigned enum expression < 0 is always false > [-Wtautological-compare] > if (id < 0 || id >= READING_MAX_ID) > ~~ ^ ~ > 1 warning generated. > Tracing XFS operations slower than 1 ms > TIME COMM PID T BYTES OFF_KB LAT(ms) FILENAME > 14:44:27 cksum 4414 R 65536 0 1.02 chcon > 14:44:27 cksum 4414 R 65536 0 1.20 cpio > 14:44:27 cksum 4414 R 65536 0 1.01 diff > 14:44:27 cksum 4414 R 65536 0 1.15 dir > [...] > > This patch fixes the warning. > What's the status of this patch? I still get these warnings on latest. Thanks, Brendan
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web