Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1589313 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-02-28 10:40 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-03-01 21:20 +0100 |
| Articles | 5 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH] clk: meson: fix SET_PARM macro Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> - 2017-02-28 10:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] clk: meson: fix SET_PARM macro Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> - 2017-02-28 19:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] clk: meson: fix SET_PARM macro Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2017-02-28 22:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] clk: meson: fix SET_PARM macro Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> - 2017-02-28 22:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] clk: meson: fix SET_PARM macro Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2017-03-01 21:20 +0100
| From | Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-28 10:40 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH] clk: meson: fix SET_PARM macro |
| Message-ID | <tfMqe-2wl-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
parameter val is not enclosed in parenthesis which is buggy when given an expression instead of a simple value Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> --- drivers/clk/meson/clkc.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/clk/meson/clkc.h b/drivers/clk/meson/clkc.h index 9bb70e7a7d6a..c6be77dd8694 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/meson/clkc.h +++ b/drivers/clk/meson/clkc.h @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ #define PARM_GET(width, shift, reg) \ (((reg) & SETPMASK(width, shift)) >> (shift)) #define PARM_SET(width, shift, reg, val) \ - (((reg) & CLRPMASK(width, shift)) | (val << (shift))) + (((reg) & CLRPMASK(width, shift)) | ((val) << (shift))) #define MESON_PARM_APPLICABLE(p) (!!((p)->width)) -- 2.9.3
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-28 19:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tfUxr-897-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1589313 |
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> writes: > parameter val is not enclosed in parenthesis which is buggy when given an > expression instead of a simple value > > Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> > --- > drivers/clk/meson/clkc.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/meson/clkc.h b/drivers/clk/meson/clkc.h > index 9bb70e7a7d6a..c6be77dd8694 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/meson/clkc.h > +++ b/drivers/clk/meson/clkc.h > @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ > #define PARM_GET(width, shift, reg) \ > (((reg) & SETPMASK(width, shift)) >> (shift)) > #define PARM_SET(width, shift, reg, val) \ > - (((reg) & CLRPMASK(width, shift)) | (val << (shift))) > + (((reg) & CLRPMASK(width, shift)) | ((val) << (shift))) > > #define MESON_PARM_APPLICABLE(p) (!!((p)->width))
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-28 22:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tfXF0-1ys-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1589313 |
On 02/28, Jerome Brunet wrote: > parameter val is not enclosed in parenthesis which is buggy when given an > expression instead of a simple value > > Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> Fixes tag? Is there a place in the code that is using a complex expression for val right now? -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-28 22:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tfXOG-1BX-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1589812 |
On Tue, 2017-02-28 at 13:26 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 02/28, Jerome Brunet wrote: > > parameter val is not enclosed in parenthesis which is buggy when > > given an > > expression instead of a simple value > > > > Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> > > Fixes tag? Is there a place in the code that is using a complex > expression for val right now? > Not if with what's already in, afaik. However "clk: meson: mpll: add rw operation" I sent earlier today uses a ternary operator for val. That's how I found this issue. Instead of running the test, it would always use the "else" clause. I realize I should sent these patches in the same series. Would you prefer me to do so ? Jerome
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-01 21:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tgiT7-89b-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1589828 |
On 02/28, Jerome Brunet wrote: > On Tue, 2017-02-28 at 13:26 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > On 02/28, Jerome Brunet wrote: > > > parameter val is not enclosed in parenthesis which is buggy when > > > given an > > > expression instead of a simple value > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> > > > > Fixes tag? Is there a place in the code that is using a complex > > expression for val right now? > > > > Not if with what's already in, afaik. However "clk: meson: mpll: add rw > operation" I sent earlier today uses a ternary operator for val. > That's how I found this issue. Instead of running the test, it would > always use the "else" clause. > > I realize I should sent these patches in the same series. > Would you prefer me to do so ? Sure, but wait a little while for any review comments on the series first please. For now I'll drop this from my queue because it isn't an urgent fix and wait for it to come back as part of the larger series. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web