Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1589763 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: bcm5301x: Add TWD WD Support to DT

Started byRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
First post2017-02-28 21:50 +0100
Last post2017-02-28 21:50 +0100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: bcm5301x: Add TWD WD Support to DT Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> - 2017-02-28 21:50 +0100

#1589763 — Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: bcm5301x: Add TWD WD Support to DT

FromRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Date2017-02-28 21:50 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: bcm5301x: Add TWD WD Support to DT
Message-ID<tfWSB-11X-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
On 28 February 2017 at 21:31, Jon Mason <jon.mason@broadcom.com> wrote:
> @@ -70,10 +70,19 @@
>                         clocks = <&periph_clk>;
>                 };
>
> -               local-timer@20600 {
> +               timer@20600 {

Is there a reason for this rename? I don't really have preference for
any name, it's just we shouldn't keep renaming this depending of
personal preferences.

It also doesn't seem like adjusting to any schema:
bcm63138.dtsi uses local-timer@1e600
bcm-nsp.dtsi uses twd-timer@20600
berlin2cd.dtsi uses local-timer@ad0600
berlin2.dtsi uses local-timer@ad0600
berlin2q.dtsi uses local-timer@ad0600


>                         compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-twd-timer";
> -                       reg = <0x20600 0x100>;
> -                       interrupts = <GIC_PPI 13 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +                       reg = <0x20600 0x20>;
> +                       interrupts = <GIC_PPI 13 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(2) |
> +                                                 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>;
> +                       clocks = <&periph_clk>;
> +               };

The rest looks OK, thanks! :)

-- 
Rafał

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web