Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1588847 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 4/5] staging: sm750fb: Remove unnecessary else after return

Started bysimran singhal <singhalsimran0@gmail.com>
First post2017-02-27 19:20 +0100
Last post2017-03-01 01:50 +0100
Articles 7 — 4 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [PATCH 4/5] staging: sm750fb: Remove unnecessary else after return simran singhal <singhalsimran0@gmail.com> - 2017-02-27 19:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 4/5] staging: sm750fb: Remove unnecessary else after  return Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-02-27 20:40 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 4/5] staging: sm750fb: Remove unnecessary else after return SIMRAN SINGHAL <singhalsimran0@gmail.com> - 2017-02-27 21:40 +0100
    Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 4/5] staging: sm750fb: Remove unnecessary  else after return Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2017-02-27 23:50 +0100
      Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 4/5] staging: sm750fb: Remove  unnecessary else after return SIMRAN SINGHAL <singhalsimran0@gmail.com> - 2017-02-28 20:20 +0100
      Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 4/5] staging: sm750fb: Remove  unnecessary else after return SIMRAN SINGHAL <singhalsimran0@gmail.com> - 2017-02-28 22:50 +0100
        Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 4/5] staging: sm750fb: Remove unnecessary  else after return Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2017-03-01 01:50 +0100

#1588847 — [PATCH 4/5] staging: sm750fb: Remove unnecessary else after return

Fromsimran singhal <singhalsimran0@gmail.com>
Date2017-02-27 19:20 +0100
Subject[PATCH 4/5] staging: sm750fb: Remove unnecessary else after return
Message-ID<tfy3T-TW-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
This patch fixes the checkpatch warning that else is not generally
useful after a break or return.

This was done using Coccinelle:
@@
expression e2;
statement s1;
@@
if(e2) { ... return ...; }
-else
         s1

Signed-off-by: simran singhal <singhalsimran0@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c | 6 ++----
 drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_swi2c.c  | 6 ++----
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c
index 259006a..6906598 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c
@@ -368,8 +368,7 @@ unsigned char sii164IsConnected(void)
 	hotPlugValue = i2cReadReg(SII164_I2C_ADDRESS, SII164_DETECT) & SII164_DETECT_HOT_PLUG_STATUS_MASK;
 	if (hotPlugValue == SII164_DETECT_HOT_PLUG_STATUS_ON)
 		return 1;
-	else
-		return 0;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -387,8 +386,7 @@ unsigned char sii164CheckInterrupt(void)
 	detectReg = i2cReadReg(SII164_I2C_ADDRESS, SII164_DETECT) & SII164_DETECT_MONITOR_STATE_MASK;
 	if (detectReg == SII164_DETECT_MONITOR_STATE_CHANGE)
 		return 1;
-	else
-		return 0;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /*
diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_swi2c.c b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_swi2c.c
index a4ac07c..5997349 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_swi2c.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_swi2c.c
@@ -199,8 +199,7 @@ static unsigned char sw_i2c_read_sda(void)
 	gpio_data = peek32(sw_i2c_data_gpio_data_reg);
 	if (gpio_data & (1 << sw_i2c_data_gpio))
 		return 1;
-	else
-		return 0;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -295,8 +294,7 @@ static long sw_i2c_write_byte(unsigned char data)
 
 	if (i < 0xff)
 		return 0;
-	else
-		return -1;
+	return -1;
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.7.4

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1588888 — Re: [PATCH 4/5] staging: sm750fb: Remove unnecessary else after return

FromJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Date2017-02-27 20:40 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/5] staging: sm750fb: Remove unnecessary else after return
Message-ID<tfzjk-1HW-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1588847
On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 23:44 +0530, simran singhal wrote:
> This patch fixes the checkpatch warning that else is not generally
> useful after a break or return.
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_swi2c.c b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_swi2c.c
[]
> @@ -295,8 +294,7 @@ static long sw_i2c_write_byte(unsigned char data)
>  
>  	if (i < 0xff)
>  		return 0;
> -	else
> -		return -1;
> +	return -1;

Assuming -1 is some sort of error,
it'd be a more common style to use

	if (i >= 0xff)
		return -1;

	return 0;

Looking at the code, it might make
sense to use something like:

	/* SDA still != 0 */
	if (i >= 0xff)
		return -1;

	return 0;
}

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1588921

FromSIMRAN SINGHAL <singhalsimran0@gmail.com>
Date2017-02-27 21:40 +0100
Message-ID<tfAfo-2lV-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1588888
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 1:01 AM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 23:44 +0530, simran singhal wrote:
>> This patch fixes the checkpatch warning that else is not generally
>> useful after a break or return.
> []
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_swi2c.c b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_swi2c.c
> []
>> @@ -295,8 +294,7 @@ static long sw_i2c_write_byte(unsigned char data)
>>
>>       if (i < 0xff)
>>               return 0;
>> -     else
>> -             return -1;
>> +     return -1;
>
> Assuming -1 is some sort of error,
> it'd be a more common style to use
>
>         if (i >= 0xff)
>                 return -1;
>
>         return 0;
>
> Looking at the code, it might make
> sense to use something like:
>
>         /* SDA still != 0 */
>         if (i >= 0xff)
>                 return -1;
>
>         return 0;
> }
I will send v2.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1589016 — Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 4/5] staging: sm750fb: Remove unnecessary else after return

FromJulia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Date2017-02-27 23:50 +0100
SubjectRe: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 4/5] staging: sm750fb: Remove unnecessary else after return
Message-ID<tfChc-3LI-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1588847

On Mon, 27 Feb 2017, simran singhal wrote:

> This patch fixes the checkpatch warning that else is not generally
> useful after a break or return.
>
> This was done using Coccinelle:
> @@
> expression e2;
> statement s1;
> @@
> if(e2) { ... return ...; }
> -else
>          s1
>
> Signed-off-by: simran singhal <singhalsimran0@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c | 6 ++----
>  drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_swi2c.c  | 6 ++----
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c
> index 259006a..6906598 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c
> @@ -368,8 +368,7 @@ unsigned char sii164IsConnected(void)
>  	hotPlugValue = i2cReadReg(SII164_I2C_ADDRESS, SII164_DETECT) & SII164_DETECT_HOT_PLUG_STATUS_MASK;
>  	if (hotPlugValue == SII164_DETECT_HOT_PLUG_STATUS_ON)
>  		return 1;
> -	else
> -		return 0;
> +	return 0;


Totally unrelated to what you are doing, but I wonder if these return
values should be true and false?  Perhaps it would help to see how the
return values are used at the calling context.

julia

>  }
>
>  /*
> @@ -387,8 +386,7 @@ unsigned char sii164CheckInterrupt(void)
>  	detectReg = i2cReadReg(SII164_I2C_ADDRESS, SII164_DETECT) & SII164_DETECT_MONITOR_STATE_MASK;
>  	if (detectReg == SII164_DETECT_MONITOR_STATE_CHANGE)
>  		return 1;
> -	else
> -		return 0;
> +	return 0;
>  }
>
>  /*
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_swi2c.c b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_swi2c.c
> index a4ac07c..5997349 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_swi2c.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_swi2c.c
> @@ -199,8 +199,7 @@ static unsigned char sw_i2c_read_sda(void)
>  	gpio_data = peek32(sw_i2c_data_gpio_data_reg);
>  	if (gpio_data & (1 << sw_i2c_data_gpio))
>  		return 1;
> -	else
> -		return 0;
> +	return 0;
>  }
>
>  /*
> @@ -295,8 +294,7 @@ static long sw_i2c_write_byte(unsigned char data)
>
>  	if (i < 0xff)
>  		return 0;
> -	else
> -		return -1;
> +	return -1;
>  }
>
>  /*
> --
> 2.7.4
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "outreachy-kernel" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to outreachy-kernel+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/outreachy-kernel/1488219268-3006-4-git-send-email-singhalsimran0%40gmail.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1589713 — Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 4/5] staging: sm750fb: Remove unnecessary else after return

FromSIMRAN SINGHAL <singhalsimran0@gmail.com>
Date2017-02-28 20:20 +0100
SubjectRe: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 4/5] staging: sm750fb: Remove unnecessary else after return
Message-ID<tfVtv-hK-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1589016
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 12:30 AM, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 1 Mar 2017, SIMRAN SINGHAL wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:45 AM, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, 27 Feb 2017, simran singhal wrote:
>> >
>> >> This patch fixes the checkpatch warning that else is not generally
>> >> useful after a break or return.
>> >>
>> >> This was done using Coccinelle:
>> >> @@
>> >> expression e2;
>> >> statement s1;
>> >> @@
>> >> if(e2) { ... return ...; }
>> >> -else
>> >>          s1
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: simran singhal <singhalsimran0@gmail.com>
>> >> ---
>> >>  drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c | 6 ++----
>> >>  drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_swi2c.c  | 6 ++----
>> >>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c
>> >> index 259006a..6906598 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c
>> >> @@ -368,8 +368,7 @@ unsigned char sii164IsConnected(void)
>> >>       hotPlugValue = i2cReadReg(SII164_I2C_ADDRESS, SII164_DETECT) & SII164_DETECT_HOT_PLUG_STATUS_MASK;
>> >>       if (hotPlugValue == SII164_DETECT_HOT_PLUG_STATUS_ON)
>> >>               return 1;
>> >> -     else
>> >> -             return 0;
>> >> +     return 0;
>> >
>> >
>> > Totally unrelated to what you are doing, but I wonder if these return
>> > values should be true and false?  Perhaps it would help to see how the
>> > return values are used at the calling context.
>> >
>> you want me to go ahead with what Joe mentioned and also do the same
>> changes here also.
>
> I think that it would be best to complete what you have underway already.
> When those patches are picked up by Greg, you can look into the
> possibility of using true and false.
>
Thanks, so for now I can ignore this.
> julia
>
>> > julia
>> >
>> >>  }
>> >>
>> >>  /*
>> >> @@ -387,8 +386,7 @@ unsigned char sii164CheckInterrupt(void)
>> >>       detectReg = i2cReadReg(SII164_I2C_ADDRESS, SII164_DETECT) & SII164_DETECT_MONITOR_STATE_MASK;
>> >>       if (detectReg == SII164_DETECT_MONITOR_STATE_CHANGE)
>> >>               return 1;
>> >> -     else
>> >> -             return 0;
>> >> +     return 0;
>> >>  }
>> >>
>> >>  /*
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_swi2c.c b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_swi2c.c
>> >> index a4ac07c..5997349 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_swi2c.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_swi2c.c
>> >> @@ -199,8 +199,7 @@ static unsigned char sw_i2c_read_sda(void)
>> >>       gpio_data = peek32(sw_i2c_data_gpio_data_reg);
>> >>       if (gpio_data & (1 << sw_i2c_data_gpio))
>> >>               return 1;
>> >> -     else
>> >> -             return 0;
>> >> +     return 0;
>> >>  }
>> >>
>> >>  /*
>> >> @@ -295,8 +294,7 @@ static long sw_i2c_write_byte(unsigned char data)
>> >>
>> >>       if (i < 0xff)
>> >>               return 0;
>> >> -     else
>> >> -             return -1;
>> >> +     return -1;
>> >>  }
>> >>
>> >>  /*
>> >> --
>> >> 2.7.4
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "outreachy-kernel" group.
>> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to outreachy-kernel+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
>> >> To post to this group, send email to outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com.
>> >> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/outreachy-kernel/1488219268-3006-4-git-send-email-singhalsimran0%40gmail.com.
>> >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> >>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "outreachy-kernel" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to outreachy-kernel+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
>> To post to this group, send email to outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/outreachy-kernel/CALrZqyNXbn1SZ8Daws7yKkYm-C-U9FHyJ_eRxvuem1Fk%2BMqs%3Dg%40mail.gmail.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1589824 — Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 4/5] staging: sm750fb: Remove unnecessary else after return

FromSIMRAN SINGHAL <singhalsimran0@gmail.com>
Date2017-02-28 22:50 +0100
SubjectRe: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 4/5] staging: sm750fb: Remove unnecessary else after return
Message-ID<tfVtv-hK-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1589016
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:45 AM, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 27 Feb 2017, simran singhal wrote:
>
>> This patch fixes the checkpatch warning that else is not generally
>> useful after a break or return.
>>
>> This was done using Coccinelle:
>> @@
>> expression e2;
>> statement s1;
>> @@
>> if(e2) { ... return ...; }
>> -else
>>          s1
>>
>> Signed-off-by: simran singhal <singhalsimran0@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c | 6 ++----
>>  drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_swi2c.c  | 6 ++----
>>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c
>> index 259006a..6906598 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c
>> @@ -368,8 +368,7 @@ unsigned char sii164IsConnected(void)
>>       hotPlugValue = i2cReadReg(SII164_I2C_ADDRESS, SII164_DETECT) & SII164_DETECT_HOT_PLUG_STATUS_MASK;
>>       if (hotPlugValue == SII164_DETECT_HOT_PLUG_STATUS_ON)
>>               return 1;
>> -     else
>> -             return 0;
>> +     return 0;
>
>
> Totally unrelated to what you are doing, but I wonder if these return
> values should be true and false?  Perhaps it would help to see how the
> return values are used at the calling context.
>
you want me to go ahead with what Joe mentioned and also do the same
changes here also.
> julia
>
>>  }
>>
>>  /*
>> @@ -387,8 +386,7 @@ unsigned char sii164CheckInterrupt(void)
>>       detectReg = i2cReadReg(SII164_I2C_ADDRESS, SII164_DETECT) & SII164_DETECT_MONITOR_STATE_MASK;
>>       if (detectReg == SII164_DETECT_MONITOR_STATE_CHANGE)
>>               return 1;
>> -     else
>> -             return 0;
>> +     return 0;
>>  }
>>
>>  /*
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_swi2c.c b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_swi2c.c
>> index a4ac07c..5997349 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_swi2c.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_swi2c.c
>> @@ -199,8 +199,7 @@ static unsigned char sw_i2c_read_sda(void)
>>       gpio_data = peek32(sw_i2c_data_gpio_data_reg);
>>       if (gpio_data & (1 << sw_i2c_data_gpio))
>>               return 1;
>> -     else
>> -             return 0;
>> +     return 0;
>>  }
>>
>>  /*
>> @@ -295,8 +294,7 @@ static long sw_i2c_write_byte(unsigned char data)
>>
>>       if (i < 0xff)
>>               return 0;
>> -     else
>> -             return -1;
>> +     return -1;
>>  }
>>
>>  /*
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "outreachy-kernel" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to outreachy-kernel+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
>> To post to this group, send email to outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/outreachy-kernel/1488219268-3006-4-git-send-email-singhalsimran0%40gmail.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1589914 — Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 4/5] staging: sm750fb: Remove unnecessary else after return

FromJulia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Date2017-03-01 01:50 +0100
SubjectRe: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 4/5] staging: sm750fb: Remove unnecessary else after return
Message-ID<tfVtv-hK-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1589824

On Wed, 1 Mar 2017, SIMRAN SINGHAL wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:45 AM, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 27 Feb 2017, simran singhal wrote:
> >
> >> This patch fixes the checkpatch warning that else is not generally
> >> useful after a break or return.
> >>
> >> This was done using Coccinelle:
> >> @@
> >> expression e2;
> >> statement s1;
> >> @@
> >> if(e2) { ... return ...; }
> >> -else
> >>          s1
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: simran singhal <singhalsimran0@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c | 6 ++----
> >>  drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_swi2c.c  | 6 ++----
> >>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c
> >> index 259006a..6906598 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c
> >> @@ -368,8 +368,7 @@ unsigned char sii164IsConnected(void)
> >>       hotPlugValue = i2cReadReg(SII164_I2C_ADDRESS, SII164_DETECT) & SII164_DETECT_HOT_PLUG_STATUS_MASK;
> >>       if (hotPlugValue == SII164_DETECT_HOT_PLUG_STATUS_ON)
> >>               return 1;
> >> -     else
> >> -             return 0;
> >> +     return 0;
> >
> >
> > Totally unrelated to what you are doing, but I wonder if these return
> > values should be true and false?  Perhaps it would help to see how the
> > return values are used at the calling context.
> >
> you want me to go ahead with what Joe mentioned and also do the same
> changes here also.

I think that it would be best to complete what you have underway already.
When those patches are picked up by Greg, you can look into the
possibility of using true and false.

julia

> > julia
> >
> >>  }
> >>
> >>  /*
> >> @@ -387,8 +386,7 @@ unsigned char sii164CheckInterrupt(void)
> >>       detectReg = i2cReadReg(SII164_I2C_ADDRESS, SII164_DETECT) & SII164_DETECT_MONITOR_STATE_MASK;
> >>       if (detectReg == SII164_DETECT_MONITOR_STATE_CHANGE)
> >>               return 1;
> >> -     else
> >> -             return 0;
> >> +     return 0;
> >>  }
> >>
> >>  /*
> >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_swi2c.c b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_swi2c.c
> >> index a4ac07c..5997349 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_swi2c.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_swi2c.c
> >> @@ -199,8 +199,7 @@ static unsigned char sw_i2c_read_sda(void)
> >>       gpio_data = peek32(sw_i2c_data_gpio_data_reg);
> >>       if (gpio_data & (1 << sw_i2c_data_gpio))
> >>               return 1;
> >> -     else
> >> -             return 0;
> >> +     return 0;
> >>  }
> >>
> >>  /*
> >> @@ -295,8 +294,7 @@ static long sw_i2c_write_byte(unsigned char data)
> >>
> >>       if (i < 0xff)
> >>               return 0;
> >> -     else
> >> -             return -1;
> >> +     return -1;
> >>  }
> >>
> >>  /*
> >> --
> >> 2.7.4
> >>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "outreachy-kernel" group.
> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to outreachy-kernel+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> >> To post to this group, send email to outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com.
> >> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/outreachy-kernel/1488219268-3006-4-git-send-email-singhalsimran0%40gmail.com.
> >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> >>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "outreachy-kernel" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to outreachy-kernel+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/outreachy-kernel/CALrZqyNXbn1SZ8Daws7yKkYm-C-U9FHyJ_eRxvuem1Fk%2BMqs%3Dg%40mail.gmail.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web