Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1587220 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-02-24 02:20 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-02-25 05:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH 2/4] perf tools: Introduce cpu_map__snprint_mask() Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> - 2017-02-24 02:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/4] perf tools: Introduce cpu_map__snprint_mask() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2017-02-24 22:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/4] perf tools: Introduce cpu_map__snprint_mask() Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> - 2017-02-25 05:40 +0100
| From | Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-24 02:20 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH 2/4] perf tools: Introduce cpu_map__snprint_mask() |
| Message-ID | <tecI9-11o-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
The cpu_map__snprint_mask() is to generate string representation of
cpumask bitmap. For cpu 0 to 11, it'll return "fff".
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
tools/perf/util/cpumap.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tools/perf/util/cpumap.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 47 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cpumap.c b/tools/perf/util/cpumap.c
index 8c7504939113..08540ab2a891 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/cpumap.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/cpumap.c
@@ -673,3 +673,49 @@ size_t cpu_map__snprint(struct cpu_map *map, char *buf, size_t size)
pr_debug("cpumask list: %s\n", buf);
return ret;
}
+
+static char hex_char(char val)
+{
+ if (0 <= val && val <= 9)
+ return val + '0';
+ if (10 <= val && val < 16)
+ return val - 10 + 'a';
+ return '?';
+}
+
+size_t cpu_map__snprint_mask(struct cpu_map *map, char *buf, size_t size)
+{
+ int i, cpu;
+ char *ptr = buf;
+ unsigned char *bitmap;
+ int last_cpu = cpu_map__cpu(map, map->nr - 1);
+
+ bitmap = zalloc((last_cpu + 7) / 8);
+ if (bitmap == NULL) {
+ buf[0] = '\0';
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < map->nr; i++) {
+ cpu = cpu_map__cpu(map, i);
+ bitmap[cpu / 8] |= 1 << (cpu % 8);
+ }
+
+ for (cpu = last_cpu / 4 * 4; cpu >= 0; cpu -= 4) {
+ unsigned char bits = bitmap[cpu / 8];
+
+ if (cpu % 8)
+ bits >>= 4;
+ else
+ bits &= 0xf;
+
+ *ptr++ = hex_char(bits);
+ if ((cpu % 32) == 0 && cpu > 0)
+ *ptr++ = ',';
+ }
+ *ptr = '\0';
+ free(bitmap);
+
+ buf[size - 1] = '\0';
+ return ptr - buf;
+}
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cpumap.h b/tools/perf/util/cpumap.h
index 1a0549af8f5c..4d231c6eac0c 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/cpumap.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/cpumap.h
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ struct cpu_map *cpu_map__dummy_new(void);
struct cpu_map *cpu_map__new_data(struct cpu_map_data *data);
struct cpu_map *cpu_map__read(FILE *file);
size_t cpu_map__snprint(struct cpu_map *map, char *buf, size_t size);
+size_t cpu_map__snprint_mask(struct cpu_map *map, char *buf, size_t size);
size_t cpu_map__fprintf(struct cpu_map *map, FILE *fp);
int cpu_map__get_socket_id(int cpu);
int cpu_map__get_socket(struct cpu_map *map, int idx, void *data);
--
2.11.1
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-24 22:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tevrr-5ZH-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1587220 |
Em Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:12:49AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> The cpu_map__snprint_mask() is to generate string representation of
> cpumask bitmap. For cpu 0 to 11, it'll return "fff".
>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/cpumap.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tools/perf/util/cpumap.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cpumap.c b/tools/perf/util/cpumap.c
> index 8c7504939113..08540ab2a891 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/cpumap.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/cpumap.c
> @@ -673,3 +673,49 @@ size_t cpu_map__snprint(struct cpu_map *map, char *buf, size_t size)
> pr_debug("cpumask list: %s\n", buf);
> return ret;
> }
> +
> +static char hex_char(char val)
Why do you use 'char' above and...
> +{
> + if (0 <= val && val <= 9)
> + return val + '0';
> + if (10 <= val && val < 16)
> + return val - 10 + 'a';
> + return '?';
> +}
> +size_t cpu_map__snprint_mask(struct cpu_map *map, char *buf, size_t size)
<SNIP>
> + for (cpu = last_cpu / 4 * 4; cpu >= 0; cpu -= 4) {
> + unsigned char bits = bitmap[cpu / 8];
'unsigned char' here?
Some compilers don't like it, for instance:
19 fedora:24-x-ARC-uClibc: FAIL
CC /tmp/build/perf/util/cpumap.o
util/cpumap.c: In function 'hex_char':
util/cpumap.c:679:2: error: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type [-Werror=type-limits]
if (0 <= val && val <= 9)
^
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
And:
10 debian:experimental-x-arm64: FAIL
CC /tmp/build/perf/util/cpumap.o
util/cpumap.c: In function 'hex_char':
util/cpumap.c:679:8: error: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type [-Werror=type-limits]
if (0 <= val && val <= 9)
^~
Are you ok with the patch below?
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cpumap.c b/tools/perf/util/cpumap.c
index 6ab8699f0233..405f56ad5c24 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/cpumap.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/cpumap.c
@@ -687,7 +687,7 @@ size_t cpu_map__snprint_mask(struct cpu_map *map, char *buf, size_t size)
{
int i, cpu;
char *ptr = buf;
- unsigned char *bitmap;
+ char *bitmap;
int last_cpu = cpu_map__cpu(map, map->nr - 1);
bitmap = zalloc((last_cpu + 7) / 8);
@@ -702,7 +702,7 @@ size_t cpu_map__snprint_mask(struct cpu_map *map, char *buf, size_t size)
}
for (cpu = last_cpu / 4 * 4; cpu >= 0; cpu -= 4) {
- unsigned char bits = bitmap[cpu / 8];
+ char bits = bitmap[cpu / 8];
if (cpu % 8)
bits >>= 4;
> + if (cpu % 8)
> + bits >>= 4;
> + else
> + bits &= 0xf;
> +
> + *ptr++ = hex_char(bits);
> + if ((cpu % 32) == 0 && cpu > 0)
> + *ptr++ = ',';
> + }
> + *ptr = '\0';
> + free(bitmap);
> +
> + buf[size - 1] = '\0';
> + return ptr - buf;
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cpumap.h b/tools/perf/util/cpumap.h
> index 1a0549af8f5c..4d231c6eac0c 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/cpumap.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/cpumap.h
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ struct cpu_map *cpu_map__dummy_new(void);
> struct cpu_map *cpu_map__new_data(struct cpu_map_data *data);
> struct cpu_map *cpu_map__read(FILE *file);
> size_t cpu_map__snprint(struct cpu_map *map, char *buf, size_t size);
> +size_t cpu_map__snprint_mask(struct cpu_map *map, char *buf, size_t size);
> size_t cpu_map__fprintf(struct cpu_map *map, FILE *fp);
> int cpu_map__get_socket_id(int cpu);
> int cpu_map__get_socket(struct cpu_map *map, int idx, void *data);
> --
> 2.11.1
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-25 05:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <teCjg-2r5-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1587942 |
Hi Arnaldo,
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 06:08:53PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:12:49AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> > The cpu_map__snprint_mask() is to generate string representation of
> > cpumask bitmap. For cpu 0 to 11, it'll return "fff".
> >
> > Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> > Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/util/cpumap.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > tools/perf/util/cpumap.h | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cpumap.c b/tools/perf/util/cpumap.c
> > index 8c7504939113..08540ab2a891 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/cpumap.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/cpumap.c
> > @@ -673,3 +673,49 @@ size_t cpu_map__snprint(struct cpu_map *map, char *buf, size_t size)
> > pr_debug("cpumask list: %s\n", buf);
> > return ret;
> > }
> > +
> > +static char hex_char(char val)
>
> Why do you use 'char' above and...
My bad. The argument should be unsigned. The semantics is that it
converts a bitmap value into a character (string).
>
> > +{
> > + if (0 <= val && val <= 9)
> > + return val + '0';
> > + if (10 <= val && val < 16)
> > + return val - 10 + 'a';
> > + return '?';
> > +}
> > +size_t cpu_map__snprint_mask(struct cpu_map *map, char *buf, size_t size)
> <SNIP>
> > + for (cpu = last_cpu / 4 * 4; cpu >= 0; cpu -= 4) {
> > + unsigned char bits = bitmap[cpu / 8];
>
> 'unsigned char' here?
>
> Some compilers don't like it, for instance:
>
> 19 fedora:24-x-ARC-uClibc: FAIL
>
> CC /tmp/build/perf/util/cpumap.o
> util/cpumap.c: In function 'hex_char':
> util/cpumap.c:679:2: error: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type [-Werror=type-limits]
> if (0 <= val && val <= 9)
> ^
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
>
> And:
>
> 10 debian:experimental-x-arm64: FAIL
>
> CC /tmp/build/perf/util/cpumap.o
> util/cpumap.c: In function 'hex_char':
> util/cpumap.c:679:8: error: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type [-Werror=type-limits]
> if (0 <= val && val <= 9)
> ^~
>
> Are you ok with the patch below?
I'd rather change hex_char() instead. How about this?
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cpumap.c b/tools/perf/util/cpumap.c
index 6ab8699f0233..061018b42393 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/cpumap.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/cpumap.c
@@ -674,11 +674,11 @@ size_t cpu_map__snprint(struct cpu_map *map, char *buf, size_t size)
return ret;
}
-static char hex_char(char val)
+static char hex_char(unsigned char val)
{
- if (0 <= val && val <= 9)
+ if (val < 10)
return val + '0';
- if (10 <= val && val < 16)
+ if (val < 16)
return val - 10 + 'a';
return '?';
}
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web