Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1587598 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-02-24 14:10 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-02-24 14:10 +0100 |
| Articles | 3 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH -stable 4.1 0/2] perf/core: Fix CVE-2017-6001 Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com> - 2017-02-24 14:10 +0100
[PATCH -stable 4.1 2/2] perf/core: Fix concurrent sys_perf_event_open() vs. 'move_group' race Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com> - 2017-02-24 14:10 +0100
[PATCH -stable 4.1 1/2] perf: Restructure perf syscall point of no return Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com> - 2017-02-24 14:10 +0100
| From | Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-24 14:10 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH -stable 4.1 0/2] perf/core: Fix CVE-2017-6001 |
| Message-ID | <tenNg-yV-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
These two patch are needed for stable 4.1. They fix CVE-2017-6001. Peter Zijlstra (2): perf: Restructure perf syscall point of no return perf/core: Fix concurrent sys_perf_event_open() vs. 'move_group' race kernel/events/core.c | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) -- 2.10.1
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-24 14:10 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH -stable 4.1 2/2] perf/core: Fix concurrent sys_perf_event_open() vs. 'move_group' race |
| Message-ID | <tenNg-yV-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1587598 |
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
[ Upstream commit 321027c1fe77f892f4ea07846aeae08cefbbb290 ]
Di Shen reported a race between two concurrent sys_perf_event_open()
calls where both try and move the same pre-existing software group
into a hardware context.
The problem is exactly that described in commit:
f63a8daa5812 ("perf: Fix event->ctx locking")
... where, while we wait for a ctx->mutex acquisition, the event->ctx
relation can have changed under us.
That very same commit failed to recognise sys_perf_event_context() as an
external access vector to the events and thereby didn't apply the
established locking rules correctly.
So while one sys_perf_event_open() call is stuck waiting on
mutex_lock_double(), the other (which owns said locks) moves the group
about. So by the time the former sys_perf_event_open() acquires the
locks, the context we've acquired is stale (and possibly dead).
Apply the established locking rules as per perf_event_ctx_lock_nested()
to the mutex_lock_double() for the 'move_group' case. This obviously means
we need to validate state after we acquire the locks.
CVE-2017-6001
Reported-by: Di Shen (Keen Lab)
Tested-by: John Dias <joaodias@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Min Chong <mchong@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Fixes: f63a8daa5812 ("perf: Fix event->ctx locking")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170106131444.GZ3174@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
[ - Correct code context
- Use group_flags instead of group_caps
]
---
kernel/events/core.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 77be116..3973df8 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -7900,6 +7900,37 @@ static int perf_event_set_clock(struct perf_event *event, clockid_t clk_id)
return 0;
}
+/*
+ * Variation on perf_event_ctx_lock_nested(), except we take two context
+ * mutexes.
+ */
+static struct perf_event_context *
+__perf_event_ctx_lock_double(struct perf_event *group_leader,
+ struct perf_event_context *ctx)
+{
+ struct perf_event_context *gctx;
+
+again:
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ gctx = READ_ONCE(group_leader->ctx);
+ if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&gctx->refcount)) {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ goto again;
+ }
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ mutex_lock_double(&gctx->mutex, &ctx->mutex);
+
+ if (group_leader->ctx != gctx) {
+ mutex_unlock(&ctx->mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(&gctx->mutex);
+ put_ctx(gctx);
+ goto again;
+ }
+
+ return gctx;
+}
+
/**
* sys_perf_event_open - open a performance event, associate it to a task/cpu
*
@@ -8123,8 +8154,26 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open,
}
if (move_group) {
- gctx = group_leader->ctx;
- mutex_lock_double(&gctx->mutex, &ctx->mutex);
+ gctx = __perf_event_ctx_lock_double(group_leader, ctx);
+
+ /*
+ * Check if we raced against another sys_perf_event_open() call
+ * moving the software group underneath us.
+ */
+ if (!(group_leader->group_flags & PERF_GROUP_SOFTWARE)) {
+ /*
+ * If someone moved the group out from under us, check
+ * if this new event wound up on the same ctx, if so
+ * its the regular !move_group case, otherwise fail.
+ */
+ if (gctx != ctx) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto err_locked;
+ } else {
+ perf_event_ctx_unlock(group_leader, gctx);
+ move_group = 0;
+ }
+ }
} else {
mutex_lock(&ctx->mutex);
}
@@ -8200,7 +8249,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open,
perf_unpin_context(ctx);
if (move_group)
- mutex_unlock(&gctx->mutex);
+ perf_event_ctx_unlock(group_leader, gctx);
mutex_unlock(&ctx->mutex);
put_online_cpus();
@@ -8229,7 +8278,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open,
err_locked:
if (move_group)
- mutex_unlock(&gctx->mutex);
+ perf_event_ctx_unlock(group_leader, gctx);
mutex_unlock(&ctx->mutex);
/* err_file: */
fput(event_file);
--
2.10.1
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-24 14:10 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH -stable 4.1 1/2] perf: Restructure perf syscall point of no return |
| Message-ID | <tenNh-yV-33@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1587598 |
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
[ Upstream commit f55fc2a57cc9ca3b1bb4fb8eb25b6e1989e5b993 ]
The exclusive_event_installable() stuff only works because its
exclusive with the grouping bits.
Rework the code such that there is a sane place to error out before we
go do things we cannot undo.
CVE 2017-6001
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
---
kernel/events/core.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 6da64f0..77be116 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -8124,13 +8124,30 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open,
if (move_group) {
gctx = group_leader->ctx;
+ mutex_lock_double(&gctx->mutex, &ctx->mutex);
+ } else {
+ mutex_lock(&ctx->mutex);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Must be under the same ctx::mutex as perf_install_in_context(),
+ * because we need to serialize with concurrent event creation.
+ */
+ if (!exclusive_event_installable(event, ctx)) {
+ /* exclusive and group stuff are assumed mutually exclusive */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(move_group);
+
+ err = -EBUSY;
+ goto err_locked;
+ }
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(ctx->parent_ctx);
+
+ if (move_group) {
/*
* See perf_event_ctx_lock() for comments on the details
* of swizzling perf_event::ctx.
*/
- mutex_lock_double(&gctx->mutex, &ctx->mutex);
-
perf_remove_from_context(group_leader, false);
list_for_each_entry(sibling, &group_leader->sibling_list,
@@ -8138,13 +8155,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open,
perf_remove_from_context(sibling, false);
put_ctx(gctx);
}
- } else {
- mutex_lock(&ctx->mutex);
- }
-
- WARN_ON_ONCE(ctx->parent_ctx);
- if (move_group) {
/*
* Wait for everybody to stop referencing the events through
* the old lists, before installing it on new lists.
@@ -8176,22 +8187,20 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open,
perf_event__state_init(group_leader);
perf_install_in_context(ctx, group_leader, group_leader->cpu);
get_ctx(ctx);
- }
- if (!exclusive_event_installable(event, ctx)) {
- err = -EBUSY;
- mutex_unlock(&ctx->mutex);
- fput(event_file);
- goto err_context;
+ /*
+ * Now that all events are installed in @ctx, nothing
+ * references @gctx anymore, so drop the last reference we have
+ * on it.
+ */
+ put_ctx(gctx);
}
perf_install_in_context(ctx, event, event->cpu);
perf_unpin_context(ctx);
- if (move_group) {
+ if (move_group)
mutex_unlock(&gctx->mutex);
- put_ctx(gctx);
- }
mutex_unlock(&ctx->mutex);
put_online_cpus();
@@ -8218,6 +8227,12 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open,
fd_install(event_fd, event_file);
return event_fd;
+err_locked:
+ if (move_group)
+ mutex_unlock(&gctx->mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(&ctx->mutex);
+/* err_file: */
+ fput(event_file);
err_context:
perf_unpin_context(ctx);
put_ctx(ctx);
--
2.10.1
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web