Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1585818 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-02-22 01:10 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-02-22 07:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
linux-next: manual merge of the kspp tree with the net-next tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-02-22 01:10 +0100
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kspp tree with the net-next tree Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> - 2017-02-22 07:40 +0100
| From | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-22 01:10 +0100 |
| Subject | linux-next: manual merge of the kspp tree with the net-next tree |
| Message-ID | <tdsFj-1xD-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the kspp tree got a conflict in:
include/linux/filter.h
between commit:
9d876e79df6a ("bpf: fix unlocking of jited image when module ronx not set")
from the net-next tree and commit:
0f5bf6d0afe4 ("arch: Rename CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA and CONFIG_DEBUG_MODULE_RONX")
from the kspp tree.
Hmmm, both these change the ifdef guards I have used the one from the
net-next tree (CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SET_MEMORY) for today, please let me know
if that is not correct.
I fixed it up (see above) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-22 07:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tdyKK-5Ut-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1585818 |
On 02/22/2017 01:06 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the kspp tree got a conflict in:
>
> include/linux/filter.h
>
> between commit:
>
> 9d876e79df6a ("bpf: fix unlocking of jited image when module ronx not set")
>
> from the net-next tree and commit:
>
> 0f5bf6d0afe4 ("arch: Rename CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA and CONFIG_DEBUG_MODULE_RONX")
>
> from the kspp tree.
>
> Hmmm, both these change the ifdef guards I have used the one from the
> net-next tree (CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SET_MEMORY) for today, please let me know
> if that is not correct.
That's fine, thanks!
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web