Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1584664 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-02-20 16:30 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-02-21 22:10 +0100 |
| Articles | 6 on this page of 26 — 7 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[GIT PULL] HID for 4.11 Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> - 2017-02-20 16:30 +0100
Re: [GIT PULL] HID for 4.11 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-02-21 03:50 +0100
Re: [GIT PULL] HID for 4.11 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-02-21 04:10 +0100
Re: [GIT PULL] HID for 4.11 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-02-21 04:20 +0100
Re: [GIT PULL] HID for 4.11 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-02-21 05:20 +0100
Re: [GIT PULL] HID for 4.11 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-02-21 05:40 +0100
Re: [GIT PULL] HID for 4.11 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-03-01 02:00 +0100
Re: [GIT PULL] HID for 4.11 Andrew Duggan <aduggan@synaptics.com> - 2017-03-01 03:40 +0100
Re: [GIT PULL] HID for 4.11 Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net> - 2017-03-01 06:00 +0100
Re: [GIT PULL] HID for 4.11 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-03-01 06:10 +0100
[PATCH] HID: rmi: fallback to generic/multitouch if hid-rmi is not built (was Re: [GIT PULL] HID for 4.11) Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> - 2017-02-21 15:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] HID: rmi: fallback to generic/multitouch if hid-rmi is not built (was Re: [GIT PULL] HID for 4.11) Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> - 2017-02-21 16:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] HID: rmi: fallback to generic/multitouch if hid-rmi is not built (was Re: [GIT PULL] HID for 4.11) Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-02-21 17:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] HID: rmi: fallback to generic/multitouch if hid-rmi is not built (was Re: [GIT PULL] HID for 4.11) Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> - 2017-02-21 18:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] HID: rmi: fallback to generic/multitouch if hid-rmi is not built (was Re: [GIT PULL] HID for 4.11) Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> - 2017-02-21 22:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] HID: rmi: fallback to generic/multitouch if hid-rmi is not built (was Re: [GIT PULL] HID for 4.11) Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-02-21 16:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] HID: rmi: fallback to generic/multitouch if hid-rmi is not built (was Re: [GIT PULL] HID for 4.11) Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> - 2017-02-21 18:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] HID: rmi: fallback to generic/multitouch if hid-rmi is not built (was Re: [GIT PULL] HID for 4.11) Andrew Duggan <aduggan@synaptics.com> - 2017-02-21 22:20 +0100
ath10k regression on XPS13 Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> - 2017-02-21 10:40 +0100
Re: ath10k regression on XPS13 David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2017-02-21 19:20 +0100
Re: ath10k regression on XPS13 Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> - 2017-02-21 19:40 +0100
Re: ath10k regression on XPS13 David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2017-02-21 20:00 +0100
Re: ath10k regression on XPS13 Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> - 2017-02-21 20:50 +0100
Re: ath10k regression on XPS13 David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2017-02-21 22:10 +0100
Re: ath10k regression on XPS13 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-02-21 20:00 +0100
Re: ath10k regression on XPS13 David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2017-02-21 22:10 +0100
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-21 19:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: ath10k regression on XPS13 |
| Message-ID | <tdnvY-6me-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1585591 |
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> writes: > From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> > Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 11:32:49 +0200 > >> We are working on a fix so that ath10k continues to work with older >> board-2.bin, but that might take a day or two still. > > Kalle I really wanted to send my net-next pull request to Linus later > today. But I guess I have to wait for this ath10k first. > > Please get this to me as soon as possible, thanks. We have a fix now but it's not really tested that well so I'm reluctant to submit it yet. As I don't want to make you wait I think I'll submit you a patch reverting f2593cb1b291 in an hour or two. And later in the week I send you a properly fixed (and tested) version of f2593cb1b291. Does that sound ok to you? -- Kalle Valo
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-21 20:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: ath10k regression on XPS13 |
| Message-ID | <tdnPj-6tO-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1585605 |
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 20:38:48 +0200 > David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> writes: > >> From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> >> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 11:32:49 +0200 >> >>> We are working on a fix so that ath10k continues to work with older >>> board-2.bin, but that might take a day or two still. >> >> Kalle I really wanted to send my net-next pull request to Linus later >> today. But I guess I have to wait for this ath10k first. >> >> Please get this to me as soon as possible, thanks. > > We have a fix now but it's not really tested that well so I'm reluctant > to submit it yet. As I don't want to make you wait I think I'll submit > you a patch reverting f2593cb1b291 in an hour or two. And later in the > week I send you a properly fixed (and tested) version of f2593cb1b291. > > Does that sound ok to you? Sure.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-21 20:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: ath10k regression on XPS13 |
| Message-ID | <tdoBH-74H-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1585626 |
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> writes: > From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> > Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 20:38:48 +0200 > >> David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> writes: >> >>> From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> >>> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 11:32:49 +0200 >>> >>>> We are working on a fix so that ath10k continues to work with older >>>> board-2.bin, but that might take a day or two still. >>> >>> Kalle I really wanted to send my net-next pull request to Linus later >>> today. But I guess I have to wait for this ath10k first. >>> >>> Please get this to me as soon as possible, thanks. >> >> We have a fix now but it's not really tested that well so I'm reluctant >> to submit it yet. As I don't want to make you wait I think I'll submit >> you a patch reverting f2593cb1b291 in an hour or two. And later in the >> week I send you a properly fixed (and tested) version of f2593cb1b291. >> >> Does that sound ok to you? > > Sure. Here's the revert: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/730735/ I didn't send a pull request because that felt overkill to do just for one patch. -- Kalle Valo
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-21 22:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: ath10k regression on XPS13 |
| Message-ID | <tdpR8-89n-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1585691 |
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 21:49:09 +0200 > David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> writes: > >> From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> >> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 20:38:48 +0200 >> >>> David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> writes: >>> >>>> From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> >>>> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 11:32:49 +0200 >>>> >>>>> We are working on a fix so that ath10k continues to work with older >>>>> board-2.bin, but that might take a day or two still. >>>> >>>> Kalle I really wanted to send my net-next pull request to Linus later >>>> today. But I guess I have to wait for this ath10k first. >>>> >>>> Please get this to me as soon as possible, thanks. >>> >>> We have a fix now but it's not really tested that well so I'm reluctant >>> to submit it yet. As I don't want to make you wait I think I'll submit >>> you a patch reverting f2593cb1b291 in an hour or two. And later in the >>> week I send you a properly fixed (and tested) version of f2593cb1b291. >>> >>> Does that sound ok to you? >> >> Sure. > > Here's the revert: > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/730735/ > > I didn't send a pull request because that felt overkill to do just for > one patch. Yep, that's fine.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-21 20:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: ath10k regression on XPS13 |
| Message-ID | <tdnPj-6tO-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1585591 |
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:18 AM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>
> Kalle I really wanted to send my net-next pull request to Linus later
> today. But I guess I have to wait for this ath10k first.
Feel free to send it to me - it sounds like the regression is
(a) easy to work around
and
(b) has a fix coming up.
And it won't even be something that I personally notice, since I have
the prev-gen XPS13 that has intel wireless.
Linus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-21 22:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: ath10k regression on XPS13 |
| Message-ID | <tdpR7-89n-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1585627 |
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 10:52:33 -0800 > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:18 AM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote: >> >> Kalle I really wanted to send my net-next pull request to Linus later >> today. But I guess I have to wait for this ath10k first. > > Feel free to send it to me - it sounds like the regression is > (a) easy to work around > and > (b) has a fix coming up. > > And it won't even be something that I personally notice, since I have > the prev-gen XPS13 that has intel wireless. I have the revert in my tree, it's all good. I'll let my tree sit quietly for a few hours then send a pull request out later tonight.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web